World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 52 2419 2179 1192 1062 161 12823

Monica Bessler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Monica Bessler between 1990 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Monica Bessler published across 29 years, from 1990 to 2018, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2015. 5 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2015. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications
1990 2018

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Monica Bessler: publications per year, 1990 to 2018
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 0
1992 1
1993 5
1994 7
1995 2
1996 5
1997 4
1998 4
1999 3
2000 1
2001 6
2002 5
2003 4
2004 10
2005 8
2006 10
2007 10
2008 11
2009 13
2010 13
2011 10
2012 10
2013 12
2014 13
2015 14
2016 8
2017 3
2018 2
Total 196
Download as CSV

Monica Bessler publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Bessler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 161 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159 161
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Monica Bessler D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica Bessler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106 52
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Monica Bessler is affiliated with the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in the United States. Their research contributions include key work published in 2020, such as the paper titled "Mice with a Mutation in the Mdm2 Gene That Interferes with MDM2/Ribosomal Protein Binding Develop a Defect in Erythropoiesis," which appeared in UNC Libraries. This publication has received citations that indicate engagement within the scientific community.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Takuya Kamio
  • Bai-Wei Gu
  • Timothy S. Olson
  • Yanping Zhang
  • Philip J. Mason

Regarding publication venues, Monica Bessler's work has been presented in:

  • UNC Libraries

This research profile identifies a strong collaboration network with multiple coauthors contributing to their projects. This collaborative approach is typical in biomedical research, especially in areas associated with genetic and molecular mechanisms, which aligns with the focus of their known publication on gene mutation and erythropoiesis.

The absence of listed awards, books, main fields of study, subfields of study, or main topics of work suggests that available data is limited, concentrating on specific research output rather than broad disciplinary classification. The research appears to contribute primarily to genetic and hematologic studies, as indicated by the focus on the Mdm2 gene and its role in erythropoiesis, which is the process of red blood cell production.

Monica Bessler's affiliation with a major children's hospital further emphasizes a clinical and biomedical orientation to their work, with potential implications for understanding genetic mutations affecting pediatric hematologic conditions.

Best Publications

  • The RNA component of telomerase is mutated in autosomal dominant dyskeratosis congenita

    Tom Vulliamy;Anna Marrone;Frederick Goldman;Andrew Dearlove

  • Natural history of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

    Peter Hillmen;S.M. Lewis;Monica Bessler;Lucio Luzzatto

  • Diagnosis and management of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

    Charles Parker;Mitsuhiro Omine;Stephen Richards;Jun-Ichi Nishimura

  • Effect of the complement inhibitor eculizumab on thromboembolism in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

    Peter Hillmen;Petra Muus;Ulrich Dührsen;Antonio M. Risitano

  • Diagnosing and treating Diamond Blackfan anaemia: results of an international clinical consensus conference

    Adrianna Vlachos;Sarah Ball;Niklas Dahl;Blanche P. Alter

  • Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is caused by somatic mutations in the PIG-A gene.

    M Bessler;P J Mason;P Hillmen;T Miyata

  • Somatic Mutations in Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: A Blessing in Disguise?

    Lucio Luzzatto;Monica Bessler;Bruno Rotoli

  • The role of human ribosomal proteins in the maturation of rRNA and ribosome production

    Sara Robledo;Rachel A. Idol;Dan L. Crimmins;Jack H. Ladenson

  • Mouse dyskerin mutations affect accumulation of telomerase RNA and small nucleolar RNA, telomerase activity, and ribosomal RNA processing

    Yuko Mochizuki;Jun He;Shashikant Kulkarni;Monica Bessler

  • Somatic mutations and cellular selection in paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria.

    M. Bessler;P.J. Mason;P. Hillmen;L. Luzzatto

  • The genetics of dyskeratosis congenita.

    Unknown

  • Dyskeratosis congenita -- a disease of dysfunctional telomere maintenance

    P. J. Mason;D. B. Wilson;M. Bessler

  • Specific defect in N-acetylglucosamine incorporation in the biosynthesis of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor in cloned cell lines from patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

    Peter Hillmen;Monica Bessler;Philip J. Mason;Winifred M. Watkins

  • TERC and TERT gene mutations in patients with bone marrow failure and the significance of telomere length measurements

    Hong Yan Du;Elena Pumbo;Jennifer Ivanovich;Ping An

  • Mutations of the SBDS gene are present in most patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome

    Jill R. Woloszynek;Robert J. Rothbaum;Amy S. Rawls;Patrick J. Minx

  • Murine embryonic stem cells without pig-a gene activity are competent for hematopoiesis with the PNH phenotype but not for clonal expansion.

    Vittorio Rosti;Gabi Tremml;Vera Soares;Pier Paolo Pandolfi

  • Cells depleted for RPS19, a protein associated with Diamond Blackfan Anemia, show defects in 18S ribosomal RNA synthesis and small ribosomal subunit production

    Rachel A. Idol;Sara Robledo;Hong-Yan Du;Dan L. Crimmins

  • 3'UTR-truncated Hmga2 cDNA causes MPN-like hematopoiesis by conferring a clonal growth advantage at the level of HSC in mice.

    Kazuhiko Ikeda;Philip J. Mason;Philip J. Mason;Monica Bessler;Monica Bessler

  • Targeted disruption of Dkc1, the gene mutated in X-linked dyskeratosis congenita, causes embryonic lethality in mice.

    Jun He;Sandra Navarrete;Murek Jasinski;Tom Vulliamy

  • Increased sensitivity to complement and a decreased red blood cell life span in mice mosaic for a nonfunctional Piga gene.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip J. Mason
Philip J. Mason Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Lucio Luzzatto
Lucio Luzzatto University of Florence
David B. Wilson
David B. Wilson Washington University in St. Louis
Jaclyn A. Biegel
Jaclyn A. Biegel University of Southern California
Peter Hillmen
Peter Hillmen St James's University Hospital
Hubert Schrezenmeier
Hubert Schrezenmeier University of Ulm
Gérard Socié
Gérard Socié Université Paris Cité
Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski
Jaroslaw P. Maciejewski Cleveland Clinic
Jeff Szer
Jeff Szer Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Russell P. Rother
Russell P. Rother Tetherex Pharmaceuticals

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, from research and healthcare to biotechnology and academics. For those seeking to broaden their expertise or transition into other science-related fields, numerous online degrees are available.

If you are interested in the human mind or clinical aspects, consider exploring the master psychologie à distance programs or an accelerated online masters in counseling degree. Both allow you to efficiently build specialized skills while maintaining flexibility with your current schedule.

Interested in the intersection of science and the justice system? Find out what can i do with a forensic psychology degree and how this qualification aligns with careers in law enforcement, criminal investigation, or legal consultancy.

For those passionate about early development, a child and adolescent psychology masters could complement your background in molecular biology, equipping you to address mental and physical health in young populations.

Exploring these related online degrees can help you forge a unique, interdisciplinary career path that combines your foundation in molecular biology with complementary skills in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Monica Bessler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles