World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
20151
World Ranking
5585
National Ranking
433

Inderjeet Dokal publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inderjeet Dokal sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 207 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Inderjeet Dokal D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Inderjeet Dokal sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Inderjeet Dokal is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom and contributes primarily to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work focuses extensively on molecular biology, genetics, physiology, hematology, and immunology.

The scientist's research addresses key topics including:

  • Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Blood disorders and treatments
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders

Recent significant papers authored by Inderjeet Dokal and collaborators include:

  • "The complex genetic landscape of familial MDS and AML reveals pathogenic germline variants" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia: A British Society for Haematology Guideline" (2024), published in British Journal of Haematology
  • "Inherited bone marrow failure in the pediatric patient" (2022), published in Blood
  • "The biology and management of dyskeratosis congenita and related disorders of telomeres" (2022), published in Expert Review of Hematology
  • "The Clinical Picture of the ERCC6L2 Disease - from Bone Marrow Failure to Acute Leukemia" (2023), published in Blood

Inderjeet Dokal has coauthored extensively with researchers such as Tom Vulliamy, Amanda J. Walne, Hemanth Tummala, Jenna Alnajar, and Nikolas Pontikos. Collaboration within this group has facilitated research across hematology and genetics.

Their work frequently appears in major publications including Blood, Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, British Journal of Haematology, The American Journal of Human Genetics, and Nature Communications.

Additionally, Inderjeet Dokal has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • X-linked dyskeratosis congenita is caused by mutations in a highly conserved gene with putative nucleolar functions

    Nina S. Heiss;Stuart W. Knight;Tom J. Vulliamy;Sabine M. Klauck

  • The RNA component of telomerase is mutated in autosomal dominant dyskeratosis congenita

    Tom Vulliamy;Anna Marrone;Frederick Goldman;Andrew Dearlove

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia.

    Sally B Killick;Nick Bown;Jamie Cavenagh;Inderjeet Dokal

  • Dyskeratosis congenita in all its forms.

    Inderjeet Dokal

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aplastic anaemia

    Judith C. W. Marsh;Sarah E. Ball;Jamie Cavenagh;Phil Darbyshire

  • The European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) Registry Working Definitions for the Clinical Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Immunity

    Markus G. Seidel;Gerhard Kindle;Benjamin Gathmann;Isabella Quinti

  • A human ortholog of archaeal DNA repair protein Hef is defective in Fanconi anemia complementation group M.

    Amom Ruhikanta Meetei;Annette L Medhurst;Chen Ling;Yutong Xue

  • Disease anticipation is associated with progressive telomere shortening in families with dyskeratosis congenita due to mutations in TERC

    Tom Vulliamy;Anna Marrone;Richard Szydlo;Amanda Walne

  • Mutations in dyskeratosis congenita: their impact on telomere length and the diversity of clinical presentation.

    Tom J. Vulliamy;Tom J. Vulliamy;Tom J. Vulliamy;Anna Marrone;Anna Marrone;Anna Marrone;Stuart W. Knight;Stuart W. Knight;Stuart W. Knight;Amanda Walne;Amanda Walne;Amanda Walne

  • Mutations in the telomerase component NHP2 cause the premature ageing syndrome dyskeratosis congenita

    Tom Vulliamy;Richard Beswick;Michael Kirwan;Anna Marrone

  • Genetic heterogeneity in autosomal recessive dyskeratosis congenita with one subtype due to mutations in the telomerase-associated protein NOP10.

    Amanda J. Walne;Tom Vulliamy;Anna Marrone;Richard Beswick

  • Association between aplastic anaemia and mutations in telomerase RNA

    Tom Vulliamy;Anna Marrone;Inderjeet Dokal;Philip J Mason

  • TINF2 mutations result in very short telomeres: analysis of a large cohort of patients with dyskeratosis congenita and related bone marrow failure syndromes

    Amanda J Walne;Thomas J Vulliamy;Richard Beswick;Michael Kirwan

  • Association of complementation group and mutation type with clinical outcome in Fanconi anemia

    Laurence Faivre;Philippe Guardiola;Cathryn Lewis;Inderjeet Dokal

  • Dyskeratosis congenita: a genetic disorder of many faces.

    M Kirwan;I Dokal

  • X-Linked Dyskeratosis Congenita Is Predominantly Caused by Missense Mutations in the DKC1 Gene

    S.W. Knight;N.S. Heiss;T.J. Vulliamy;S. Greschner

  • Somatic mosaicism in Fanconi anemia: molecular basis and clinical significance.

    J.R. Lo Ten Foe;M.L. <b Kwee;M.A. Rooimans;A.B. Oostra

  • Constitutional mutations in RTEL1 cause severe dyskeratosis congenita.

    Amanda J. Walne;Tom Vulliamy;Michael Kirwan;Vincent Plagnol

  • Very short telomeres in the peripheral blood of patients with X-linked and autosomal dyskeratosis congenita.

    Tom J Vulliamy;Stuart W Knight;Philip J Mason;Inderjeet Dokal

  • Outcome of 69 allogeneic stem cell transplantations for Fanconi anemia using HLA-matched unrelated donors : a study on behalf of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Ph. Guardiola;R. Pasquini;I. Dokal;J. J. Ortega

Frequent Co-Authors

Tom Vulliamy
Tom Vulliamy Queen Mary University of London
Philip J. Mason
Philip J. Mason Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Irene Roberts
Irene Roberts University of Oxford
Judith C. W. Marsh
Judith C. W. Marsh King's College London
Jude Fitzgibbon
Jude Fitzgibbon Queen Mary University of London
Neil V. Morgan
Neil V. Morgan University of Birmingham
Christopher G. Mathew
Christopher G. Mathew King's College London
Vincent Plagnol
Vincent Plagnol University College London
Eliane Gluckman
Eliane Gluckman Université Paris Cité
Monica Bessler
Monica Bessler Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in Biology or Biochemistry, there are diverse online degrees and career pathways you can explore in the USA. Accelerated online programs now allow students to fast-track their education. For example, accelerated dietitian programs are ideal for those aiming to enter nutrition-related fields quickly, combining scientific knowledge with practical skills.

For those seeking leadership or administrative roles in healthcare, an online healthcare mba program offers a flexible and affordable option to develop essential management expertise.

Certifications in medical coding are another valuable route. When deciding between pathways, learn more about ccs vs cpc certification—each offering different specializations, costs, and salary expectations.

If you want to enter the workforce sooner, consider medical coding. Not only is demand growing, but you can discover how much do medical coders make and the steps needed to start this rewarding career.

These flexible options enable you to tailor your education and career to fit your goals within biology, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Inderjeet Dokal

Trending Scientists