World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13309 12527 1238 1185 357 24317

Judith C. W. Marsh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Judith C. W. Marsh between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Judith C. W. Marsh published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2010. 3 of the 360 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2010. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

360 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Judith C. W. Marsh: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 3
1988 2
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 4
1993 3
1994 5
1995 5
1996 6
1997 8
1998 5
1999 14
2000 16
2001 6
2002 10
2003 7
2004 9
2005 17
2006 10
2007 16
2008 7
2009 14
2010 23
2011 22
2012 12
2013 20
2014 19
2015 17
2016 10
2017 13
2018 8
2019 13
2020 13
2021 7
2022 1
2023 0
2024 2
2025 1
Total 360
Download as CSV

Judith C. W. Marsh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith C. W. Marsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 357
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Judith C. W. Marsh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judith C. W. Marsh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Judith C. W. Marsh is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their primary area of research lies within Medicine, with a focus on Hematology, Immunology, Genetics, Oncology, and Infectious Diseases. The scientist's work extensively covers hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, acute myeloid leukemia, blood disorders, the complement system in diseases, blood groups and transfusion, as well as COVID-19 clinical research.

Their most frequent publication venues include the British Journal of Haematology, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Blood, New England Journal of Medicine, and Nature Communications.

  • British Journal of Haematology
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation
  • Blood
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • Nature Communications

Published papers by Judith C. W. Marsh include:

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia: A British Society for Haematology Guideline, 2024, British Journal of Haematology
  • Eltrombopag Added to Immunosuppression in Severe Aplastic Anemia, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • The complex genetic landscape of familial MDS and AML reveals pathogenic germline variants, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Poor outcome and prolonged persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in COVID-19 patients with haematological malignancies; King's College Hospital experience, 2020, British Journal of Haematology
  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aplastic anemia: current indications and transplant strategies, 2020, Blood Reviews

They have collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, including Austin Kulasekararaj, Antonio M. Risitano, Shreyans Gandhi, Constantijn J.M. Halkes, and Ghulam J. Mufti.

  • Austin Kulasekararaj
  • Antonio M. Risitano
  • Shreyans Gandhi
  • Constantijn J.M. Halkes
  • Ghulam J. Mufti

The scientist's research focuses on several main topics:

  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Blood disorders and treatments
  • Complement system in diseases
  • Blood groups and transfusion
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Best Publications

  • Effect of eculizumab on hemolysis and transfusion requirements in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

    Peter Hillmen;Claire Hall;Judith C W Marsh;Modupe Elebute

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia.

    Sally B Killick;Nick Bown;Jamie Cavenagh;Inderjeet Dokal

  • Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aplastic anaemia

    Judith C. W. Marsh;Sarah E. Ball;Jamie Cavenagh;Phil Darbyshire

  • In vivo CAMPATH-1H prevents graft-versus-host disease following nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation.

    Panagiotis D Kottaridis;Donald W Milligan;Rajesh Chopra;Ronjon Chakraverty

  • A new syndrome of refractory sideroblastic anemia with vacuolization of marrow precursors and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction.

    Howard A. Pearson;Jeffrey S. Lobel;Samuel A. Kocoshis;J. Lawrence Naiman

  • The use of 7-amino actinomycin D in identifying apoptosis : Simplicity of use and broad spectrum of application compared with other techniques

    N. J. Philpott;A. J. C. Turner;J. Scopes;M. Westby

  • Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) versus immunosuppression for the treatment of severe aplastic anaemia (SAA): a report of the EBMT* SAA Working Party

    A. Bacigalupo;J. Hows;E. Gluckman;C. Nissen

  • Indications for allo- and auto-SCT for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2015

    A. Sureda;P. Bader;S. Cesaro;P. Dreger

  • Treatment of acquired severe aplastic anemia: bone marrow transplantation compared with immunosuppressive therapy--The European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation experience.

    Andrea Bacigalupo;Ronald Brand;Rosi Oneto;Barbara Bruno

  • Progressive Telomere Shortening in Aplastic Anemia

    Sarah E. Ball;Frances M. Gibson;Siân Rizzo;Jennifer A. Tooze

  • Worse outcome and more chronic GVHD with peripheral blood progenitor cells than bone marrow in HLA-matched sibling donor transplants for young patients with severe acquired aplastic anemia.

    Hubert Schrezenmeier;Jakob R. Passweg;Judith C. W. Marsh;Andrea Bacigalupo

  • Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation using a reduced- intensity conditioning regimen has the capacity to produce durable remissions and long-term disease- free survival in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia

    Sudhir Tauro;Charles Craddock;Karl Peggs;Gulnaz Begum

  • TP53 mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome are strongly correlated with aberrations of chromosome 5, and correlate with adverse prognosis.

    Austin Gladston Kulasekararaj;Alexander E. Smith;Syed Mian;Azim M. Mohamedali

  • Prospective randomized multicenter study comparing cyclosporin alone versus the combination of antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin for treatment of patients with nonsevere aplastic anemia: a report from the European Blood and Marrow Transplant (EBMT) Severe Aplastic Anaemia Working Party.

    J. Marsh;H. Schrezenmeier;P. Marin;O. Ilhan

  • Growth of human umbilical-cord blood in longterm haemopoietic cultures

    J.M. Hows;J.C.W. Marsh;T. Luft;L. Coutinho

  • The EBMT activity survey: 1990-2010.

    J R Passweg;H Baldomero;A Gratwohl;M Bregni

  • The toxicity and efficacy of donor lymphocyte infusions given after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

    David I Marks;Richard Lush;Jamie Cavenagh;Donald W Milligan

  • Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, antithymocyte globulin, with or without low dose total body irradiation, for alternative donor transplants, in acquired severe aplastic anemia: a retrospective study from the EBMT-SAA working party

    Andrea Bacigalupo;Gerard Socie;Edoardo Lanino;Arcangelo Prete

  • A randomized controlled study in patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia receiving antithymocyte globulin (ATG), cyclosporine, with or without G-CSF: a study of the SAA Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

    André Tichelli;Hubert Schrezenmeier;Gérard Socié;Judith Marsh

  • Somatic mutations identify a subgroup of aplastic anemia patients who progress to myelodysplastic syndrome

    Austin G. Kulasekararaj;Austin G. Kulasekararaj;Jie Jiang;Jie Jiang;Alexander E. Smith;Alexander E. Smith;Azim M. Mohamedali;Azim M. Mohamedali

Frequent Co-Authors

Ghulam J. Mufti
Ghulam J. Mufti King's College London
Jakob Passweg
Jakob Passweg University Hospital of Basel
Gérard Socié
Gérard Socié Université Paris Cité
Andrea Bacigalupo
Andrea Bacigalupo Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
André Tichelli
André Tichelli University Hospital of Basel
Hubert Schrezenmeier
Hubert Schrezenmeier University of Ulm
Mahmoud Aljurf
Mahmoud Aljurf King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre
Régis Peffault de Latour
Régis Peffault de Latour Hôpital Saint-Louis
Vikas Gupta
Vikas Gupta Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Inderjeet Dokal
Inderjeet Dokal Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers but seeking flexibility, online nursing programs offer a range of accessible options. Many students begin with associate or diploma-level training and then progress to advanced degrees. One popular option is the cheapest online bsn programs, ideal for those looking to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing in a cost-effective manner.

Registered nurses aiming to take the next step often consider the cheapest rn to bsn pathways, enabling them to upgrade their qualifications without leaving their job. For nursing professionals interested in advanced practice roles, the cheapest np programs online can prepare graduates for specialized careers, including prescribing medication and diagnosing illness.

Those striving for leadership, research, or teaching roles may explore online nursing phd programs. These rigorous degrees open up opportunities to impact healthcare policy, conduct research, or teach future nurses. Online pathways make it possible to obtain these qualifications at a lower cost and with greater flexibility, making advanced nursing careers more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Judith C. W. Marsh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles