World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
24866
World Ranking
17966
National Ranking
1642

Charles Craddock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Craddock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 443 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Charles Craddock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Craddock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles Craddock is affiliated with the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly focuses on hematology, with a particular emphasis on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Their work covers several main fields and subfields of study including:

  • Medicine
  • Hematology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology

Craddock's research topics span a range of subjects within hematology and oncology, particularly:

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • CAR-T Cell Therapy Research
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

They have contributed to several notable publications, including:

  • "Augmented Reduced-Intensity Regimen Does Not Improve Postallogeneic Transplant Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia," 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN," 2022, Blood
  • "Acute myeloid leukaemia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up," 2020, Annals of Oncology
  • "Redefining and measuring transplant conditioning intensity in current era: a study in acute myeloid leukemia patients," 2020, Bone Marrow Transplantation
  • "Molecular MRD status and outcome after transplantation in NPM1-mutated AML," 2020, Blood

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Mohamad Mohty
  • Arnon Nagler
  • Myriam Labopin
  • Victoria Potter
  • Fabio Ciceri

Charles Craddock's research output is published extensively across several venues, including:

  • Blood
  • Bone Marrow Transplantation
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • British Journal of Haematology
  • Leukemia

Best Publications

  • Coexistence of LMPP-like and GMP-like Leukemia Stem Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Nicolas Goardon;Emanuele Marchi;Ann Atzberger;Lynn Quek

  • Adoptive transfer of cytomegalovirus-specific CTL to stem cell transplant patients after selection by HLA–peptide tetramers

    Mark Cobbold;Naeem Khan;Batoul Pourgheysari;Sudhir Tauro

  • The VLA4/VCAM-1 adhesion pathway defines contrasting mechanisms of lodgement of transplanted murine hemopoietic progenitors between bone marrow and spleen.

    Thalia Papayannopoulou;Charles Craddock;Betty Nakamoto;Gregory V. Priestley

  • Histone deacetylases in acute myeloid leukaemia show a distinctive pattern of expression that changes selectively in response to deacetylase inhibitors.

    C A Bradbury;F L Khanim;R Hayden;C M Bunce

  • Induction of a CD8+ T-cell response to the MAGE cancer testis antigen by combined treatment with azacitidine and sodium valproate in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia

    Oliver Goodyear;Angelo Agathanggelou;Igor Novitzky-Basso;Shamyla Siddique

  • Azacitidine augments expansion of regulatory T cells after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

    Oliver C. Goodyear;Mike Dennis;Nadira Y. Jilani;Nadira Y. Jilani;Justin Loke

  • Addition of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin to Induction Chemotherapy Improves Survival in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Alan Kenneth Burnett;Nigel H. Russell;Robert Kerrin Hills;Jonathan Kell

  • High incidence of cytomegalovirus infection after nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation: potential role of Campath-1H in delaying immune reconstitution.

    Suparno Chakrabarti;Stephen Mackinnon;Rajesh Chopra;Panagiotis D Kottaridis

  • Comparison of single-dose and escalating-dose regimens of donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse after allografting for chronic myeloid leukemia

    Francesco Dazzi;R. M. Szydlo;C. Craddock;N. C. Cross

  • Limiting transplantation-related mortality following unrelated donor stem cell transplantation by using a nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen

    Ronjon Chakraverty;Karl S Peggs;Rajesh Chopra;Donald W Milligan

  • Direct visualization of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell reconstitution after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

    Kate Cwynarski;Jenni Ainsworth;Jenni Ainsworth;Mark Cobbold;Mark Cobbold;Simon Wagner;Simon Wagner

  • Clinical evidence of a graft-versus-Hodgkin's-lymphoma effect after reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation.

    Karl S Peggs;Ann Hunter;Rajesh Chopra;Anne Parker

  • Lactic acidosis and hypoglycaemia in children with severe malaria: pathophysiological and prognostic significance

    S. Krishna;D.W. Waller;F.ter Kuile;F.ter Kuile;D. Kwiatkowski;D. Kwiatkowski

  • Durability of responses following donor lymphocyte infusions for patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia

    Francesco Dazzi;Richard M. Szydlo;Nicholas C P Cross;C. Charles Craddock

  • Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation using a reduced- intensity conditioning regimen has the capacity to produce durable remissions and long-term disease- free survival in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia

    Sudhir Tauro;Charles Craddock;Karl Peggs;Gulnaz Begum

  • Outcomes after alemtuzumab-containing reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation regimen for relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma

    Emma Morris;Kirsty Thomson;Kirsty Thomson;Charles Craddock;Charles Craddock;Prem Mahendra;Prem Mahendra

  • Antibodies to VLA4 Integrin Mobilize Long-Term Repopulating Cells and Augment Cytokine-Induced Mobilization in Primates and Mice

    Charles F. Craddock;Charles F. Craddock;Betty Nakamoto;Betty Nakamoto;Robert G. Andrews;Robert G. Andrews;Gregory V. Priestley;Gregory V. Priestley

  • Clinical Features and Outcome of Severe Malaria in Gambian Children

    D Waller;S Krishna;J Crawley;K Miller

  • Chronic graft-versus-host disease is associated with increased numbers of peripheral blood CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells

    Fiona J Clark;Richard Gregg;Karen Piper;Debbie Dunnion

  • INDUCTION OF A CD8(+) T CELL RESPONSE TO THE MAGE CANCER TESTIS ANTIGEN BY COMBINED TREATMENT WITH AZACITIDINE AND SODIUM VALPROATE IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA AND MYELODYSPLASIA

    O Goodyear;I Novitzky-Basso;S Siddique;G Ryan

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel H. Russell
Nigel H. Russell University of Nottingham
Arnon Nagler
Arnon Nagler Sheba Medical Center
Myriam Labopin
Myriam Labopin Université Paris Cité
Paul Moss
Paul Moss University of Birmingham
Jan J. Cornelissen
Jan J. Cornelissen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gérard Socié
Gérard Socié Université Paris Cité
Paresh Vyas
Paresh Vyas University of Oxford
Donald Milligan
Donald Milligan University of Birmingham
Jane F. Apperley
Jane F. Apperley Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring healthcare professionals have more flexible study options than ever before. Many choose to pursue online degrees that accelerate entry into clinical practice or help them advance in their nursing careers. For example, those interested in advanced nursing roles should consider online nursing doctoral programs, which offer a blend of academic rigor and convenience for working nurses aiming for top-tier qualifications.

If you’re just starting or looking to upgrade your credentials, cheap rn to bsn online programs make earning a Bachelor of Science in Nursing both affordable and accessible. For individuals from non-nursing backgrounds wanting to enter the field quickly, direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online are an efficient pathway.

Choosing the right school is also crucial. Some institutions are known for being more accessible and inclusive, making it easier for motivated candidates to launch their careers. Explore a curated list of easy nursing schools to get into to find programs that match your academic profile and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Charles Craddock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles