What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Neil V. Morgan mostly deals with Genetics, Mutation, FANCA, Cancer research and Endocrinology.
He combines topics linked to WDR45 with his work on Genetics.
His study in the field of Germline mutation and Dopamine transporter deficiency syndrome also crosses realms of Parkinsonism.
His studies deal with areas such as Complementation, FANCG and Molecular biology as well as FANCA.
His Cancer research research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Hypoxia-inducible factors, Renal cell carcinoma, Tumor suppressor gene, Gene product and Epigenetics.
His research integrates issues of Internal medicine and Transcription factor in his study of Endocrinology.
His most cited work include:
- Sporadic primary pulmonary hypertension is associated with germline mutations of the gene encoding BMPR-II, a receptor member of the TGF-beta family. (618 citations)
- Clinical and molecular genetic features of pulmonary hypertension in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (593 citations)
- BMPR2 Haploinsufficiency as the Inherited Molecular Mechanism for Primary Pulmonary Hypertension (463 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Genetics, Gene, Mutation, Platelet and Cancer research.
His Genetics study typically links adjacent topics like Molecular biology.
Neil V. Morgan studied Mutation and Phenotype that intersect with Candidate gene and Genotype.
His Platelet research integrates issues from Megakaryocyte and Bioinformatics.
His Cancer research study combines topics in areas such as Endocrinology, Hypoxia-inducible factors, Germline, Renal cell carcinoma and Tumor suppressor gene.
His study focuses on the intersection of Complementation and fields such as FANCA with connections in the field of Allele.
He most often published in these fields:
- Genetics (46.91%)
- Gene (19.75%)
- Mutation (16.67%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Platelet (15.43%)
- Gene (19.75%)
- Genetics (46.91%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Neil V. Morgan focuses on Platelet, Gene, Genetics, Cell biology and Exome sequencing.
His work on Platelet disorder as part of general Platelet research is often related to Characterization and Workflow, thus linking different fields of science.
His study brings together the fields of Thrombopoietin and Genetics.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Cell biology, Mutant, Ribosomal RNA and Missense mutation is strongly linked to Megakaryocyte.
His Exome sequencing research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Genetic variants, Bioinformatics and Copy-number variation.
His research in Internal medicine intersects with topics in Gastroenterology and Mutation.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Introducing high-throughput sequencing into mainstream genetic diagnosis practice in inherited platelet disorders. (54 citations)
- Potential genetic causes of miscarriage in euploid pregnancies: a systematic review. (23 citations)
- Mutation in GNE is associated with severe congenital thrombocytopenia (21 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of investigation include Bioinformatics, Platelet, Exome sequencing, Phenotype and Genetics.
His work deals with themes such as Comparative genomic hybridization, Exome and Recurrent miscarriage, which intersect with Bioinformatics.
His Platelet study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Gastroenterology, Normal range, Laboratory.hematology and Mutation.
To a larger extent, Neil V. Morgan studies Gene with the aim of understanding Exome sequencing.
His work in the fields of Phenotype, such as Genetic heterogeneity, overlaps with other areas such as Sitosterolemia, Eltrombopag and DIAPH1.
His Genetics study is mostly concerned with Genetic variation, Thrombocytopenic purpura, Transposable element, Gene mutation and Genetic diagnosis.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
