World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael J. Tisdale

Michael J. Tisdale

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
25214
World Ranking
15614
National Ranking
1440

Michael J. Tisdale publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Tisdale sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 286 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael J. Tisdale D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Tisdale sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Tisdale is affiliated with Aston University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Neuroscience. Within these main fields, their work focuses on Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience as subfields of study.

The scientist's research topics include Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects, Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling, and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology. These themes highlight a concentration on understanding receptor functions and signaling pathways in biological systems.

In terms of publication venues, Michael J. Tisdale has contributed to Scientific Reports. This venue is noted as the primary platform for their scientific outputs documented here.

Their recent published work includes the paper titled Simple ammonium salts acting on sigma-1 receptors yield potential treatments for cancer and depression, published in 2020 within Scientific Reports. This paper has been cited 22 times, indicating engagement within the research community.

Their work has involved collaboration with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • James Michael Brimson
  • Kiran Kumar Akula
  • Haider Abbas
  • David Ferry
  • Kanwaljit Chopra

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms of Cancer Cachexia

    Michael J. Tisdale

  • Cachexia in cancer patients

    Michael J. Tisdale

  • Effect of a protein and energy dense n-3 fatty acid enriched oral supplement on loss of weight and lean tissue in cancer cachexia: a randomised double blind trial

    K C H Fearon;M F von Meyenfeldt;A G W Moses;R van Geenen

  • Biology of Cachexia

    Michael J. Tisdale

  • Silencing of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Suppresses Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-2–Driven VHL−/− Renal Cancer

    Helen J. Smith;Pradip Mukerji;Michael J. Tisdale

  • The effect of an oral nutritional supplement enriched with fish oil on weight-loss in patients with pancreatic cancer.

    M D Barber;James Ross;A C Voss;M J Tisdale

  • Characterization of a cancer cachectic factor

    Penio Todorov;Peter Cariuk;Trudi McDevitt;Brian Coles

  • The effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids on the progress of cachexia in patients with pancreatic cancer.

    Stephen J. Wigmore;James A. Ross;J. Stuart Falconer;Claire E. Plester

  • Increased expression of proteasome subunits in skeletal muscle of cancer patients with weight loss.

    J. Khal;Anna V. Hine;K.C.H. Fearon;C.H.C. Dejong

  • Zinc-α2-glycoprotein, a lipid mobilizing factor, is expressed in adipocytes and is up-regulated in mice with cancer cachexia

    Chen Bing;Yi Bao;John Jenkins;Paul Sanders

  • Effect of oral eicosapentaenoic acid on weight loss in patients with pancreatic cancer.

    Stephen J. Wigmore;Matthew D. Barber;James A. Ross;Michael J. Tisdale

  • Expression of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and muscle loss in experimental cancer cachexia

    J. Khal;S.M. Wyke;Steve T. Russell;Anna V. Hine

  • Biological evaluation of a lipid-mobilizing factor isolated from the urine of cancer patients

    Kouzo Hirai;Helen J. Hussey;Matthew D. Barber;Sarah A. Price

  • Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study of eicosapentaenoic acid diester in patients with cancer cachexia

    Kenneth C.H. Fearon;Matthew D. Barber;Alastair G. Moses;Sam H. Ahmedzai

  • Anticachectic and Antitumor Effect of Eicosapentaenoic Acid and Its Effect on Protein Turnover

    Susan A. Beck;Kate L. Smith;Michael J. Tisdale

  • Mechanism of Attenuation of Skeletal Muscle Protein Catabolism in Cancer Cachexia by Eicosapentaenoic Acid

    Alison S. Whitehouse;Helen J. Smith;Joanne L. Drake;Michael J. Tisdale

  • Cancer anorexia and cachexia

    Michael J Tisdale

  • Induction of protein catabolism and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by mild oxidative stress

    Maria Cristina C. Gomes-Marcondes;Michael J. Tisdale

  • Signaling pathways initiated by beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate to attenuate the depression of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle in response to cachectic stimuli.

    Helen L. Eley;Steven T. Russell;Jeffrey H. Baxter;Pradip Mukerji

  • Effect of a Protein and Energy Dense N-3 Fatty Acid Enriched Oral Supplement on Loss of Weight and Lean Tissue in Cancer Cachexia: A Randomised Double Blind Trial

    N Aaronson;Matthew Barber;Judy Bauer;Ken Fearon

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth C. H. Fearon
Kenneth C. H. Fearon University of Edinburgh
Stephen J. Wigmore
Stephen J. Wigmore University of Edinburgh
Michael R.W. Brown
Michael R.W. Brown University of Dundee
Saul J. B. Tendler
Saul J. B. Tendler University of Nottingham
Denis C. Guttridge
Denis C. Guttridge Medical University of South Carolina
Tony Ng
Tony Ng King's College London
Roger Barraclough
Roger Barraclough University of Liverpool
Paul Trayhurn
Paul Trayhurn University of Liverpool
David J. Glass
David J. Glass Regeneron (United States)
Vickie E. Baracos
Vickie E. Baracos University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can offer flexible alternatives for those interested in medical careers. Many nursing programs now offer convenient online learning formats, making career advancement more accessible than ever.

For registered nurses, best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements are a major draw, helping RNs earn their BSN without having to complete additional onsite clinicals. Nurses aiming to reach higher leadership roles may consider furthering their education through dnp online programs, which allow for advanced study in a flexible online format.

Some advanced programs are also streamlined for efficiency; several dnp programs without dissertation allow nurses to obtain their doctorate without the extensive research component. Meanwhile, those just starting their careers may find that online lpn programs provide a quicker path into the workforce.

Each of these online pathways supports diverse goals, from entering nursing to advancing into leadership, while offering greater flexibility for busy students.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Tisdale

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles