World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
40
Citations
18057
World Ranking
1624
National Ranking
682

Mark E. Mendenhall publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Mendenhall sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 119 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Mark E. Mendenhall D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Mendenhall sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Mendenhall is affiliated with the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in the United States. Their research spans multiple academic fields, primarily within Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Psychology. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the variety of topics and subfields they have contributed to.

Their published work includes a focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Communication, Political Science and International Relations, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. These subfields align with the main research themes found in their publications and coauthorships.

Key research topics addressed by Mendenhall include International Student and Expatriate Challenges, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Cultural Differences and Values, Higher Education Governance and Development, Organizational Learning and Leadership, Counseling Practices and Supervision, and Zoonotic Diseases and Public Health. These areas highlight the broad scope of their academic inquiry.

Their recent papers demonstrate ongoing contributions to management and global mobility research. Notable publications include:

  • The Formation and Preservation of Behavioral Integration in the Top Management Team of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (2022, Journal of Management History)
  • Facilitating Transfer of Learning in Professional Development Programs: A Cognitive-Behavioral Tool (2020, Management Teaching Review)
  • EXPERT REVIEW SERIES Restoring a Parched Tributary in Global Mobility Research: The Study of Expatriates as Leaders (2024, Journal of Global Mobility The Home of Expatriate Management Research)

Mendenhall frequently collaborates with several scholars in their field. Major coauthors include Joyce S. Osland, B. Sebastian Reiche, Betina Szkudlarek, Lisa A. Burke-Smalley, and Martha L. Maznevski. These ongoing partnerships underscore a network of professionals working on related topics within global leadership and expatriate management.

They have also contributed to book publications with Emerald Publishing Limited, with titles titled "Advances in Global Leadership" released in both 2022 and 2023. These works reflect a continued engagement in global leadership research and its development.

Best Publications

  • Toward a Comprehensive Model of International Adjustment: An Integration of Multiple Theoretical Perspectives

    J. Stewart Black;Mark Mendenhall;Gary Oddou

  • Cross-Cultural Training Effectiveness: A Review and a Theoretical Framework for Future Research

    J. Stewart Black;Mark Mendenhall

  • The Dimensions of Expatriate Acculturation: A Review

    Mark Mendenhall;Gary Oddou

  • Global assignments : successfully expatriating and repatriating international managers

    J. Stewart Black;Hal B. Gregersen;Mark E. Mendenhall

  • The U-Curve Adjustment Hypothesis Revisited: A Review and Theoretical Framework

    J. Stewart Black;Mark Mendenhall

  • Expatriate Selection, Training and Career‐Pathing: A Review and Critique

    Mark E. Mendenhall;Edward Dunbar;Gary R. Oddou

  • Toward a Theoretical Framework of Repatriation Adjustment

    J. Stewart Black;Hal B. Gregersen;Mark E. Mendenhall

  • Global Leadership: Research, Practice and Development

    Mark E. Mendenhall;Joyce Osland;Allan Bird;Gary R. Oddou

  • Defining the content domain of intercultural competence for global leaders

    Allan Bird;Mark Mendenhall;Michael J. Stevens;Gary Oddou

  • Cross-Cultural Training Effectiveness: A Review and a Theoretical Framework for Future Research

    Unknown

  • A practical but theory‐based framework for selecting cross‐cultural training methods

    J. Stewart Black;Mark Mendenhall

  • DEFINING THE 'GLOBAL' IN GLOBAL LEADERSHIP

    Mark E. Mendenhall;B. Sebastian Reiche;Allan Bird;Joyce S. Osland

  • Developing Global Leadership Capabilities and Global Mindset: A Review

    Joyce S. Osland;Allan Bird;Mark Mendenhall;Asbjorn Osland

  • The Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale: Towards a more refined measure for international management research

    Jeffrey L. Herman;Michael J. Stevens;Allan Bird;Mark Mendenhall

  • From cross-cultural management to global leadership: Evolution and adaptation

    Allan Bird;Mark E. Mendenhall

  • Expatriate training and development: Where do we go from here?

    Mark E. Mendenhall;G nter K. Stahl

  • Contextualizing leadership: a typology of global leadership roles

    B. Sebastian Reiche;Allan Bird;Mark E. Mendenhall;Joyce S. Osland

  • Responsible Leadership: A Mapping of Extant Research and Future Directions

    Christof Miska;Mark E. Mendenhall

  • Sociocultural Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions: Unresolved Paradoxes and Directions for Future Research

    Gunter K Stahl;Duncan N Angwin;Philippe Very;Emmanuel Gomes

  • Leveraging travel as a tool for global leadership development

    Gary Oddou;Mark E. Mendenhall;J. Bonner Ritchie

  • Employee Development and Expatriate Assignments

    Mark E. Mendenhall;Torsten M. Kühlmann;Günther K. Stahl;Joyce S. Osland

Frequent Co-Authors

Hal B. Gregersen
Hal B. Gregersen Brigham Young University
Günter K. Stahl
Günter K. Stahl Vienna University of Economics and Business
Linda K. Stroh
Linda K. Stroh Loyola University Chicago
B. Sebastian Reiche
B. Sebastian Reiche University of Navarra
Emanuel Gomes
Emanuel Gomes Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Niels Noorderhaven
Niels Noorderhaven Tilburg University
Ingmar Björkman
Ingmar Björkman Hanken School of Economics
Shlomo Y. Tarba
Shlomo Y. Tarba University of Birmingham
Yaakov Weber
Yaakov Weber College of Management Academic Studies

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management studies in the USA opens a wide array of online degree options, many of which focus on key career pathways. Those interested in project delivery and infrastructure may consider an online construction management degree cost to understand both the financial and managerial aspects of the field.

Professionals aiming for upper management roles can look to accredited executive mba online courses. These programs are designed for working adults seeking advanced leadership skills without pausing their careers.

If affordability is a key concern, there are many inexpensive masters degrees available online. These options deliver high-quality education in various specialties without the high price tag of traditional courses.

For those drawn to the technology-driven aspects of business, pursuing online masters in data science programs can provide the analytical skills required in today’s data-centric markets.

Each of these degrees supports distinct career pathways, offering flexibility, accessibility, and the skills demanded by top employers worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Mendenhall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles