World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lorenz Poellinger

Lorenz Poellinger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 92 699 15 173 32600

Lorenz Poellinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lorenz Poellinger between 1981 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lorenz Poellinger published across 43 years, from 1981 to 2023, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 8 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 5 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 7 publications
1981 2023

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lorenz Poellinger: publications per year, 1981 to 2023
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 5
1983 1
1984 1
1985 3
1986 6
1987 6
1988 8
1989 5
1990 3
1991 6
1992 4
1993 6
1994 6
1995 8
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 7
2000 6
2001 6
2002 10
2003 7
2004 4
2005 8
2006 11
2007 5
2008 8
2009 5
2010 4
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 9
2015 6
2016 2
2017 7
2018 6
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
2022 1
2023 7
Total 216
Download as CSV

Lorenz Poellinger publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenz Poellinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–176 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 173 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131 173
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Lorenz Poellinger D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorenz Poellinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51 92
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Lorenz Poellinger is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and specializes in research within the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their body of work encompasses 12 publications predominantly focused on the subfields of Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, and Physiology.

The main topics addressed in Poellinger's research include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Cancer-related gene regulation, and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics. Additional areas of investigation cover Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism, RNA modifications and cancer, Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, and Signaling Pathways in Disease.

The scientist has co-authored publications frequently with researchers such as Hisao Masai, Wendi Sun, Hiroyuki Kato, Shojiro Kitajima, and Takashi Okamoto. Their collaborative efforts span multiple studies in various scientific journals.

Poellinger has contributed articles to these prominent scientific venues:

  • Oncogene
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Epigenetics
  • Scientific Reports

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Lorenz Poellinger include:

  • "Cancer-derived UTX TPR mutations G137V and D336G impair interaction with MLL3/4 complexes and affect UTX subcellular localization," 2020, Oncogene
  • "Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and poly [ADP ribose] polymerase 1 cooperatively regulate Notch3 expression under hypoxia via a noncanonical mechanism," 2022, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • "Catalytic domain-dependent and -independent transcriptional activities of the tumour suppressor histone H3K27 demethylase UTX/KDM6A in specific cancer types," 2023, Epigenetics
  • "A KDM6 inhibitor potently induces ATF4 and its target gene expression through HRI activation and by UTX inhibition," 2021, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Hypoxia Requires Notch Signaling to Maintain the Undifferentiated Cell State

    Maria V. Gustafsson;Xiaowei Zheng;Teresa Pereira;Katarina Gradin

  • Mechanism of regulation of the hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α by the von Hippel‐Lindau tumor suppressor protein

    Keiji Tanimoto;Yuichi Makino;Teresa Pereira;Lorenz Poellinger

  • Regulation of the Hypoxia-inducible Transcription Factor 1α by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway

    Pekka J. Kallio;William J. Wilson;Sallyann O'Brien;Yuichi Makino

  • Notch signaling mediates hypoxia-induced tumor cell migration and invasion

    Cecilia Sahlgren;Maria V. Gustafsson;Shaobo Jin;Lorenz Poellinger

  • Inhibitory PAS domain protein is a negative regulator of hypoxia-inducible gene expression

    Yuichi Makino;Renhai Cao;Kristian Svensson;Göran Bertilsson

  • Signal transduction in hypoxic cells: inducible nuclear translocation and recruitment of the CBP/p300 coactivator by the hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha.

    Pekka J. Kallio;Kensaku Okamoto;Kensaku Okamoto;Sallyann O'Brien;Pilar Carrero

  • Recruitment of HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha to common target genes is differentially regulated in neuroblastoma: HIF-2alpha promotes an aggressive phenotype.

    Linda Holmquist-Mengelbier;Erik Fredlund;Tobias Löfstedt;Rosa Noguera

  • Molecular mechanisms of transcription activation by HLF and HIF1alpha in response to hypoxia: their stabilization and redox signal-induced interaction with CBP/p300.

    Masatsugu Ema;Kiichi Hirota;Junsei Mimura;Hisaku Abe

  • Stabilization of HIF-1α is critical to improve wound healing in diabetic mice

    Ileana Ruxandra Botusan;Vivekananda Gupta Sunkari;Octavian Savu;Anca Irinel Catrina

  • Inhibitory PAS Domain Protein (IPAS) Is a Hypoxia-inducible Splicing Variant of the Hypoxia-inducible Factor-3α Locus

    Yuichi Makino;Arvydas Kanopka;William J. Wilson;Hirotoshi Tanaka

  • Redox-Regulated Recruitment of the Transcriptional Coactivators CREB-Binding Protein and SRC-1 to Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α

    Pilar Carrero;Kensaku Okamoto;Kensaku Okamoto;Pascal Coumailleau;Sallyann O'Brien

  • Functional interference between hypoxia and dioxin signal transduction pathways: competition for recruitment of the Arnt transcription factor.

    K Gradin;J McGuire;R H Wenger;I Kvietikova

  • Hypoxia alters gene expression in human neuroblastoma cells toward an immature and neural crest-like phenotype

    Annika Jögi;Ingrid Øra;Helén Nilsson;Åsa Lindeheim

  • Regulation of glucocorticoid receptor expression: evidence for transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms.

    Yu Dong;Lorenz Poellinger;Jan-Åke Gustafsson;Sam Okret

  • Evidence That the Co-chaperone p23 Regulates Ligand Responsiveness of the Dioxin (Aryl Hydrocarbon) Receptor

    Arunas Kazlauskas;Lorenz Poellinger;Ingemar Pongratz

  • Generating specificity and diversity in the transcriptional response to hypoxia.

    Urban Lendahl;Kian Leong Lee;Henry Yang;Lorenz Poellinger;Lorenz Poellinger

  • Efficient Endoderm Induction from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by Logically Directing Signals Controlling Lineage Bifurcations

    Kyle M. Loh;Kyle M. Loh;Lay Teng Ang;Jingyao Zhang;Vibhor Kumar

  • Physiological activation of hypoxia inducible factor-1 in human skeletal muscle

    Helene Ameln;Thomas Gustafsson;Carl Johan Sundberg;Kensaku Okamoto;Kensaku Okamoto

  • Interaction with factor inhibiting HIF-1 defines an additional mode of cross-coupling between the Notch and hypoxia signaling pathways

    Xiaofeng Zheng;Sarah Linke;José M. Dias;Xiaowei Zheng

  • Association of the dioxin receptor with the Mr 90,000 heat shock protein: a structural kinship with the glucocorticoid receptor.

    Marc Denis;Scott Cuthill;Ann Charlotte Wikström;Lorenz Poellinger

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan-Åke Gustafsson
Jan-Åke Gustafsson University of Houston
Murray L. Whitelaw
Murray L. Whitelaw University of Adelaide
Hirotoshi Tanaka
Hirotoshi Tanaka Keio University
Sam Okret
Sam Okret Karolinska Institute
Sven Pettersson
Sven Pettersson Karolinska Institute
Jan Carlstedt-Duke
Jan Carlstedt-Duke Nanyang Technological University
Rune Toftgård
Rune Toftgård Karolinska Institute
Randall S. Johnson
Randall S. Johnson University of Cambridge
Jozef Dulak
Jozef Dulak Jagiellonian University
Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
Seppo Ylä-Herttuala University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to many interdisciplinary careers. For students considering a shift in direction, related online degrees offer flexibility and diverse opportunities. If you’re interested in healthcare, a masters in human services online prepares graduates for supportive and administrative roles, often found in clinical and community settings.

Molecular Biology knowledge provides a strong foundation for specialized paths like speech pathology. Teachers or professionals interested in clinical communication roles may find guidance in transitioning from education to healthcare at teacher to speech language pathologist.

For those seeking a broader scientific or analytical focus, programs such as the online degree mathematics are ideal. Analytical skills gained here are highly valued in research and technology sectors.

Alternatively, blending biology with design is possible in architecture. Learners can explore STEM-related design principles through some of the best online architecture degree programs.

Whether you continue in science or pivot to a new field, these online options expand your career horizons while fostering valuable, transferable skills.

Best Scientists Citing Lorenz Poellinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles