World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
87
Citations
19127
World Ranking
2900
National Ranking
1488

Richard L. Moss publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Moss sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 253 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard L. Moss D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Moss sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Moss is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine, with a strong concentration on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their work covers several subfields including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, biomedical engineering, spectroscopy, and surgery. The main research topics are diverse and include cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, cardiovascular effects of exercise, cardiovascular function and risk factors, congenital heart defects research, viral infections and immunology research, muscle physiology and disorders, and muscle activation and electromyography studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard L. Moss include Willem J. de Lange, J. Carter Ralphe, Daniel P. Fitzsimons, Emily T. Farrell, and Laurin M. Hanft.

Richard L. Moss has published extensively in several scientific venues. The main venues where their work appears are:

  • The Journal of General Physiology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
  • Biophysical Journal
  • UNC Libraries

Notable recent publications include:

  • Distinct hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genotypes result in convergent sarcomeric proteoform profiles revealed by top-down proteomics, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Cardiac MyBP-C phosphorylation regulates the Frank-Starling relationship in murine hearts, 2021, The Journal of General Physiology
  • cMyBP-C ablation in human engineered cardiac tissue causes progressive Ca2+-handling abnormalities, 2023, The Journal of General Physiology
  • cMyBP-C phosphorylation modulates the time-dependent slowing of unloaded shortening in murine skinned myocardium, 2021, The Journal of General Physiology
  • The W792R HCM missense mutation in the C6 domain of cardiac myosin binding protein-C increases contractility in neonatal mouse myocardium, 2024, Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Maximum velocity of shortening in relation to myosin isoform composition in single fibres from human skeletal muscles.

    L Larsson;R L Moss

  • Laparotomy versus Peritoneal Drainage for Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Perforation

    R. Lawrence Moss;Reed A. Dimmitt;Douglas C. Barnhart;Karl G. Sylvester

  • Shortening velocity in single fibers from adult rabbit soleus muscles is correlated with myosin heavy chain composition.

    P J Reiser;R L Moss;G G Giulian;M L Greaser

  • Improved methodology for analysis and quantitation of proteins on one-dimensional silver-stained slab gels.

    Gary G. Giulian;Richard L. Moss;Marion Greaser

  • Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C Knockout Mice

    Samantha P. Harris;Christopher R. Bartley;Timothy A. Hacker;Kerry S. McDonald

  • Variations in cross-bridge attachment rate and tension with phosphorylation of myosin in mammalian skinned skeletal muscle fibers: Implications for twitch potentiation in intact muscle

    Joseph M. Metzger;Marion L. Greaser;Richard L. Moss

  • Absence of the β subunit (cchb1) of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor alters expression of the α1 subunit and eliminates excitation-contraction coupling

    Ronald G. Gregg;Albee Messing;Caroline Strube;Maryline Beurg

  • Variations in contractile properties of rabbit single muscle fibres in relation to troponin T isoforms and myosin light chains.

    M L Greaser;R L Moss;P J Reiser

  • Impaired cardiomyocyte relaxation and diastolic function in transgenic mice expressing slow skeletal troponin I in the heart

    Richard C. Fentzke;Scott H. Buck;Jitandrakumar R. Patel;Hua Lin

  • Three-dimensional structure of vertebrate cardiac muscle myosin filaments

    Maria E. Zoghbi;John L. Woodhead;Richard L. Moss;Roger W. Craig

  • Alterations in Ca2+ sensitive tension due to partial extraction of C-protein from rat skinned cardiac myocytes and rabbit skeletal muscle fibers.

    P A Hofmann;H C Hartzell;R L Moss

  • Acceleration of Crossbridge Kinetics by Protein Kinase A Phosphorylation of Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein C Modulates Cardiac Function

    Carl W. Tong;Julian E. Stelzer;Marion L. Greaser;Patricia A. Powers

  • Osmotic Compression of Single Cardiac Myocytes Eliminates the Reduction in Ca2+ Sensitivity of Tension at Short Sarcomere Length

    Kerry S. McDonald;Richard L. Moss

  • Ca2+ regulation of mechanical properties of striated muscle. Mechanistic studies using extraction and replacement of regulatory proteins.

    R L Moss

  • Influence of a strong-binding myosin analogue on calcium-sensitive mechanical properties of skinned skeletal muscle fibers.

    D R Swartz;R L Moss

  • Primary structure and properties of helothermine, a peptide toxin that blocks ryanodine receptors.

    J. Morrissette;J. Krätzschmar;B. Haendler;R. el-Hayek

  • Contractile properties of skeletal muscle fibers in relation to myofibrillar protein isoforms

    R. L. Moss;G. M. Diffee;M. L. Greaser

  • Top-down quantitative proteomics identified phosphorylation of cardiac troponin I as a candidate biomarker for chronic heart failure.

    Jiang Zhang;Moltu J. Guy;Holly S. Norman;Yi Chen Chen

  • Greater hydrogen ion-induced depression of tension and velocity in skinned single fibres of rat fast than slow muscles.

    J M Metzger;R L Moss

  • Beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation increases unloaded shortening velocity of skinned single ventricular myocytes from rats.

    Kevin T. Strang;Nancy K. Sweitzer;Marion L. Greaser;Richard L. Moss

Frequent Co-Authors

Marion L. Greaser
Marion L. Greaser University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ying Ge
Ying Ge University of Wisconsin–Madison
Héctor H. Valdivia
Héctor H. Valdivia University of Wisconsin–Madison
Henk Granzier
Henk Granzier University of Arizona
Robert G. Cassens
Robert G. Cassens University of Wisconsin–Madison
Roger Craig
Roger Craig University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Ju Chen
Ju Chen University of California, San Diego
Leslie A. Leinwand
Leslie A. Leinwand University of Colorado Boulder
R. John Solaro
R. John Solaro University of Illinois at Chicago
David D. Thomas
David D. Thomas University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Moss

Trending Scientists