World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 59 10126 9156 2815 2316 170 12543
Biology and Biochemistry 62 10827 9991 4698 4215 200 13358

Ying Ge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ying Ge between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ying Ge published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 11.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2025. 42 of the 299 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2025. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 29 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 40 publications 2026: 2 publications
2000 2026

299 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ying Ge: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 4
2002 3
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 2
2009 9
2010 2
2011 6
2012 10
2013 7
2014 12
2015 8
2016 9
2017 15
2018 19
2019 22
2020 18
2021 18
2022 29
2023 38
2024 22
2025 40
2026 2
Total 299
Download as CSV

Ying Ge publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ying Ge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 170 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350 170
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Ying Ge D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ying Ge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930 59
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ying Ge is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, medicine, and chemistry, with substantial contributions to subfields including molecular biology, spectroscopy, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, surgery, and oncology.

The scientist's work focuses largely on advanced proteomics techniques and applications, as well as mass spectrometry techniques and applications. Other major research topics include metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, and analytical chemistry and chromatography.

Ying Ge has published extensively in a range of academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on proteomics and mass spectrometry, including:

  • "The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome" (2021) in Science Advances
  • "Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics" (2021) in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • "Top-down proteomics: challenges, innovations, and applications in basic and clinical research" (2020) in Expert Review of Proteomics
  • "Higher-order structural characterisation of native proteins and complexes by top-down mass spectrometry" (2020) in Chemical Science
  • "Interlaboratory Study for Characterizing Monoclonal Antibodies by Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry" (2020) in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

They collaborate frequently with other researchers in related fields. Among frequent co-authors are David S. Roberts, Yanlong Zhu, Kyle A. Brown, Jake A. Melby, and Song Jin, reflecting active engagement in collaborative academic research.

Best Publications

  • How many human proteoforms are there

    Ruedi Aebersold;Jeffrey N. Agar;I. Jonathan Amster;Mark S. Baker

  • Cardiac Repair in a Porcine Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction with Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiovascular Cells

    Lei Ye;Ying Hua Chang;Qiang Xiong;Pengyuan Zhang

  • Top down characterization of larger proteins (45 kDa) by electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry.

    Ying Ge;Brian G Lawhorn;Mariam ElNaggar;Erick Strauss

  • Large Cardiac Muscle Patches Engineered From Human Induced-Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiac Cells Improve Recovery From Myocardial Infarction in Swine.

    Ling Gao;Zachery R. Gregorich;Wuqiang Zhu;Saidulu Mattapally

  • Activated ion electron capture dissociation for mass spectral sequencing of larger (42 kDa) proteins.

    David M. Horn;Ying Ge;Fred W. Mclafferty

  • Best practices and benchmarks for intact protein analysis for top-down mass spectrometry.

    Daniel P. Donnelly;Catherine M. Rawlins;Caroline J. DeHart;Luca Fornelli

  • Top-down mass spectrometry of a 29-kDa protein for characterization of any posttranslational modification to within one residue.

    Siu Kwan Sze;Ying Ge;HanBin Oh;Fred W. McLafferty

  • Electron capture dissociation of gaseous multiply charged ions by Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance.

    Fred W. McLafferty;David M. Horn;Kathrin Breuker;Ying Ge

  • Secondary and tertiary structures of gaseous protein ions characterized by electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry and photofragment spectroscopy.

    HanBin Oh;Kathrin Breuker;Siu Kwan Sze;Ying Ge

  • Top‐down proteomics in health and disease: Challenges and opportunities

    Zachery R. Gregorich;Ying Ge

  • The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome.

    Lloyd M. Smith;Jeffrey N. Agar;Julia Chamot-Rooke;Paul O. Danis

  • Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.

    Leah V. Schaffer;Robert J. Millikin;Rachel M. Miller;Lissa C. Anderson

  • Top-down quantitative proteomics identified phosphorylation of cardiac troponin I as a candidate biomarker for chronic heart failure.

    Jiang Zhang;Moltu J. Guy;Holly S. Norman;Yi Chen Chen

  • Top-Down Proteomics: Ready for Prime Time?

    Bifan Chen;Kyle A. Brown;Ziqing Lin;Ying Ge

  • Comprehensive Analysis of Protein Modifications by Top-down Mass Spectrometry

    Han Zhang;Ying Ge

  • Top-down high-resolution mass spectrometry of cardiac myosin binding protein C revealed that truncation alters protein phosphorylation state

    Ying Ge;Inna N. Rybakova;Qingge Xu;Richard L. Moss

  • Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.

    Jake A. Melby;David S. Roberts;Eli J. Larson;Kyle A. Brown

  • Trace derivatives of kynurenine potently activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)

    Seung-Hyeon Seok;Zhi-Xiong Ma;John B. Feltenberger;Hongbo Chen

  • Forging Isopeptide Bonds Using Thiol–Ene Chemistry: Site-Specific Coupling of Ubiquitin Molecules for Studying the Activity of Isopeptidases

    Ellen M. Valkevich;Robert G. Guenette;Nicholas A. Sanchez;Yi-chen Chen

  • MASH Suite Pro: A Comprehensive Software Tool for Top-Down Proteomics.

    Wenxuan Cai;Wenxuan Cai;Huseyin Guner;Huseyin Guner;Zachery R. Gregorich;Zachery R. Gregorich;Albert J. Chen

  • Unraveling Molecular Complexity of Phosphorylated Human Cardiac Troponin I by Top Down Electron Capture Dissociation/Electron Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry

    Vlad Zabrouskov;Ying Ge;Jae Schwartz;Jeffery W. Walker

  • Biosynthesis of the thiazole moiety of thiamin in Escherichia coli: identification of an acyldisulfide-linked protein--protein conjugate that is functionally analogous to the ubiquitin/E1 complex.

    Jun Xi;Ying Ge;Cynthia Kinsland;Fred W. McLafferty

Frequent Co-Authors

Song Jin
Song Jin University of Wisconsin–Madison
Fred W. McLafferty
Fred W. McLafferty Cornell University
Neil L. Kelleher
Neil L. Kelleher Northwestern University
Lloyd M. Smith
Lloyd M. Smith University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard L. Moss
Richard L. Moss University of Wisconsin–Madison
Timothy J. Kamp
Timothy J. Kamp University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joseph A. Loo
Joseph A. Loo University of California, Los Angeles
Han Zhang
Han Zhang Shenzhen University
Paul M. Thomas
Paul M. Thomas Northwestern University
Ljiljana Paša-Tolić
Ljiljana Paša-Tolić Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a chemistry degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields and career options. For those interested in healthcare, understanding how to become a pharmacist salary plays a key role in making informed decisions about this path. A pharmacy career combines chemistry knowledge with patient care, offering competitive compensation and strong job stability.

Forensic science is another promising avenue, blending chemistry with criminal investigations. Students can explore affordable options like a forensic science bachelor degree online to gain specialized skills without disrupting their schedules. Postgraduate studies, such as an online master's degree in forensic psychology, further expand career prospects into psychological assessments within the justice system.

Those interested in more hands-on, technical roles should also consider the rising demand for autopsy technicians. Learning about the role through resources like autopsy tech education and salary insight helps evaluate this unique career path, which involves supporting medical examiners in pathology labs.

Overall, chemistry graduates find a wealth of opportunities across healthcare, forensic science, and technical specialties. Online degree programs make these fields accessible, allowing students to tailor their education to their career goals while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Ying Ge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles