World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
61
Citations
12284
World Ranking
11433
National Ranking
4939

Paul M. Thomas publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 145 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Paul M. Thomas D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul M. Thomas is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, focusing primarily on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions in chemistry as well.

The scientist's main subfields of study include molecular biology, spectroscopy, pharmacology, computational mechanics, and inorganic chemistry. Their work extensively addresses advanced proteomics techniques and applications, mass spectrometry techniques, biomedical text mining and ontologies, genomics and phylogenetic studies, epigenetics and DNA methylation, cancer-related gene regulation, and RNA modifications related to cancer.

Paul M. Thomas has published in several scientific venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Biochemistry
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Angewandte Chemie
  • Science

Some of the recent publications associated with their research are:

  • The Blood Proteoform Atlas: A reference map of proteoforms in human hematopoietic cells, 2022, Science
  • NMT1 and NMT2 are lysine myristoyltransferases regulating the ARF6 GTPase cycle, 2020, Nature Communications
  • The serine hydroxymethyltransferase-2 (SHMT2) initiates lymphoma development through epigenetic tumor suppressor silencing, 2020, Nature Cancer
  • Deeper Protein Identification Using Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry in Top-Down Proteomics, 2021, Analytical Chemistry
  • Heterologous Expression of the Unusual Terreazepine Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Reveals a Promising Approach for Identifying New Chemical Scaffolds, 2020, mBio

Throughout their career, Paul M. Thomas has collaborated frequently with other researchers. The most common co-authors include:

  • Neil L. Kelleher
  • Ryan T. Fellers
  • Jeannie M. Camarillo
  • Richard D. LeDuc
  • Joseph B. Greer

Best Publications

  • How many human proteoforms are there

    Ruedi Aebersold;Jeffrey N. Agar;I. Jonathan Amster;Mark S. Baker

  • Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top-down proteomics

    John C. Tran;Leonid Zamdborg;Dorothy R. Ahlf;Dorothy R. Ahlf;Ji Eun Lee;Ji Eun Lee

  • The MMSET histone methyl transferase switches global histone methylation and alters gene expression in t(4;14) multiple myeloma cells

    Eva Martinez-Garcia;Relja Popovic;Dong Joon Min;Steve M.M. Sweet

  • Complete Protein Characterization Using Top-Down Mass Spectrometry and Ultraviolet Photodissociation

    Jared B. Shaw;Wenzong Li;Dustin D. Holden;Yan Zhang

  • Loss of BAP1 function leads to EZH2-dependent transformation.

    Lindsay M. Lafave;Wendy Béguelin;Richard Koche;Matt Teater

  • Discovery and in vitro biosynthesis of haloduracin, a two-component lantibiotic

    Amanda L. McClerren;Lisa E. Cooper;Chao Quan;Paul P. Thomas

  • Tracking acidic pharmaceuticals, caffeine, and triclosan through the wastewater treatment process

    Paul M. Thomas;Gregory D. Foster

  • ProSight Lite: Graphical software to analyze top-down mass spectrometry data

    Ryan T. Fellers;Joseph B. Greer;Bryan P. Early;Xiang Yu

  • The vermiform appendix impacts the risk of developing Parkinson’s disease

    Bryan A. Killinger;Zachary Madaj;Jacek W. Sikora;Nolwen Rey;Nolwen Rey

  • Deconstruction of iterative multidomain polyketide synthase function.

    Jason M. Crawford;Paul M. Thomas;Jonathan R. Scheerer;Anna L. Vagstad

  • On the Scalability and Requirements of Whole Protein Mass Spectrometry

    Philip D. Compton;Leonid Zamdborg;Paul M. Thomas;Neil L. Kelleher

  • Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.

    Leah V. Schaffer;Robert J. Millikin;Rachel M. Miller;Lissa C. Anderson

  • Cell-free protein synthesis from genomically recoded bacteria enables multisite incorporation of noncanonical amino acids

    Rey W. Martin;Benjamin J. Des Soye;Yong Chan Kwon;Jennifer Kay

  • Analysis of Intact Monoclonal Antibody IgG1 by Electron Transfer Dissociation Orbitrap FTMS

    Luca Fornelli;Eugen Damoc;Paul M. Thomas;Neil L. Kelleher

  • A protease for 'middle-down' proteomics

    Cong Wu;John C Tran;Leonid Zamdborg;Kenneth R Durbin

  • A scalable platform to identify fungal secondary metabolites and their gene clusters

    Kenneth D. Clevenger;Jin Woo Bok;Rosa Ye;Galen P. Miley

  • Large-scale Top-down Proteomics of the Human Proteome: Membrane Proteins, Mitochondria, and Senescence

    Adam D. Catherman;Kenneth R. Durbin;Dorothy R. Ahlf;Bryan P. Early

  • A proteomics approach to discovering natural products and their biosynthetic pathways.

    Stefanie B Bumpus;Bradley S Evans;Paul M Thomas;Ioanna Ntai

  • Top-Down Proteomics on a Chromatographic Time Scale Using Linear Ion Trap Fourier Transform Hybrid Mass Spectrometers

    Bryan A. Parks;Lihua Jiang;Paul M. Thomas;Craig D. Wenger

  • Total kinetic analysis reveals how combinatorial methylation patterns are established on lysines 27 and 36 of histone H3

    Yupeng Zheng;Steve M. M. Sweet;Relja Popovic;Eva Martinez-Garcia

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil L. Kelleher
Neil L. Kelleher Northwestern University
Nancy P. Keller
Nancy P. Keller University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ying Ge
Ying Ge University of Wisconsin–Madison
Lloyd M. Smith
Lloyd M. Smith University of Wisconsin–Madison
William W. Metcalf
William W. Metcalf University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ari Melnick
Ari Melnick Cornell University
Michael C. Jewett
Michael C. Jewett Northwestern University
John D. Crispino
John D. Crispino Northwestern University
Wilfred A. van der Donk
Wilfred A. van der Donk University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Thomas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles