World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
117
Citations
50221
World Ranking
719
National Ranking
456

Chemistry

D-Index
110
Citations
44217
World Ranking
807
National Ranking
321

Neil L. Kelleher publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil L. Kelleher sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 517 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Neil L. Kelleher D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil L. Kelleher sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Neil L. Kelleher is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Chemistry. Their work spans numerous subfields, particularly Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Pharmacology, Computational Mechanics, and Infectious Diseases.

The main topics covered in their research include Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies, RNA modifications and cancer, Ion-surface interactions and analysis, and mechanisms related to RNA and protein synthesis.

Neil L. Kelleher has been involved in a broad array of scientific publications with a significant number of papers appearing in various venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • Nature Methods

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Kelleher include:

  • "The emerging landscape of single-molecule protein sequencing technologies," 2021, Nature Methods
  • "Histone H1 loss drives lymphoma by disrupting 3D chromatin architecture," 2020, Nature
  • "The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome," 2021, Science Advances
  • "Multiplexed mass spectrometry of individual ions improves measurement of proteoforms and their complexes," 2020, Nature Methods
  • "An interpreted atlas of biosynthetic gene clusters from 1,000 fungal genomes," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Collaboration has played a significant role in Kelleher's scientific contributions. Frequent co-authors include Rafael D. Melani, Ryan T. Fellers, Jeannie M. Camarillo, Jared O. Kafader, and Paul M. Thomas.

Across their career, Kelleher has been recognized by receiving the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation fellowship in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Electron Capture Dissociation of Multiply Charged Protein Cations. A Nonergodic Process

    Roman A. Zubarev;Neil L. Kelleher;Fred W. McLafferty

  • Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity

    Lloyd M Smith;Neil L Kelleher

  • Electron Capture Dissociation for Structural Characterization of Multiply Charged Protein Cations

    Roman A. Zubarev;David M. Horn;Einar K. Fridriksson;Neil L. Kelleher

  • How many human proteoforms are there

    Ruedi Aebersold;Jeffrey N. Agar;I. Jonathan Amster;Mark S. Baker

  • A computational framework to explore large-scale biosynthetic diversity

    Jorge C. Navarro-Muñoz;Nelly Selem-Mojica;Michael W. Mullowney;Satria A. Kautsar

  • EZH2 Is Required for Germinal Center Formation and Somatic EZH2 Mutations Promote Lymphoid Transformation

    Wendy Béguelin;Relja Popovic;Matt Teater;Yanwen Jiang

  • Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top-down proteomics

    John C. Tran;Leonid Zamdborg;Dorothy R. Ahlf;Dorothy R. Ahlf;Ji Eun Lee;Ji Eun Lee

  • Top down versus bottom up protein characterization by tandem high- resolution mass spectrometry

    Neil L. Kelleher;Hong Y. Lin;Gary A. Valaskovic;David J. Aaserud

  • Peer Reviewed: Top-Down Proteomics

    Neil L. Kelleher

  • Progress in Top-Down Proteomics and the Analysis of Proteoforms

    Timothy K. Toby;Luca Fornelli;Neil L. Kelleher

  • Top Down proteomics: Facts and perspectives

    Adam D. Catherman;Owen S. Skinner;Neil L. Kelleher

  • Decoding protein modifications using top-down mass spectrometry

    Nertila Siuti;Neil L Kelleher

  • A roadmap for natural product discovery based on large-scale genomics and metabolomics

    James R. Doroghazi;Jessica C. Albright;Anthony W. Goering;Kou San Ju

  • Precision proteomics: The case for high resolution and high mass accuracy

    Matthias Mann;Neil L. Kelleher

  • Genetically encoded short peptide tag for versatile protein labeling by Sfp phosphopantetheinyl transferase

    Jun Yin;Paul D. Straight;Shaun M. McLoughlin;Zhe Zhou

  • Attomole Protein Characterization by Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry

    Gary A. Valaskovic;Neil L. Kelleher;Fred W. McLafferty

  • A monovalent streptavidin with a single femtomolar biotin binding site

    Mark Howarth;Daniel J F Chinnapen;Kimberly Gerrow;Pieter C. Dorrestein

  • Localization of labile posttranslational modifications by electron capture dissociation: The case of γ-carboxyglutamic acid

    Neil L. Kelleher;Roman A. Zubarev;Kristine Bush;Bruce Furie

  • Therapeutic targeting of polycomb and BET bromodomain proteins in diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas

    Andrea Piunti;Rintaro Hashizume;Marc A. Morgan;Elizabeth T. Bartom

  • The MMSET histone methyl transferase switches global histone methylation and alters gene expression in t(4;14) multiple myeloma cells

    Eva Martinez-Garcia;Relja Popovic;Dong Joon Min;Steve M.M. Sweet

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul M. Thomas
Paul M. Thomas Northwestern University
Christopher T. Walsh
Christopher T. Walsh Stanford University
Fred W. McLafferty
Fred W. McLafferty Cornell University
Jonathan D. Licht
Jonathan D. Licht University of Florida
Pieter C. Dorrestein
Pieter C. Dorrestein University of California, San Diego
William W. Metcalf
William W. Metcalf University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lloyd M. Smith
Lloyd M. Smith University of Wisconsin–Madison
Nancy P. Keller
Nancy P. Keller University of Wisconsin–Madison
Wilfred A. van der Donk
Wilfred A. van der Donk University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Richard B. Silverman
Richard B. Silverman Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to diverse and flexible online degree options in related health fields. Pursuing an online education allows you to tailor your studies to fit around work or personal commitments, making it easier to upskill or switch careers in healthcare and wellness.

For those interested in the mental health sector, consider the shortest online pmhnp certificate programs that enable registered nurses to specialize quickly as psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners. Similarly, nurses can expand their clinical expertise through online fnp programs, preparing for roles as family nurse practitioners.

If nutrition and public health are your interests, there are nutritionist degree online pathways that emphasize evidence-based approaches to dietetics and holistic health. Alternatively, advancing from registered nurse to bachelor’s level can be streamlined with online rn to bsn programs.

With these flexible online options, you can shape a rewarding career allied with Biology and Biochemistry—no matter where you are in your academic or professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Neil L. Kelleher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles