World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
88
Citations
36087
World Ranking
2653
National Ranking
1379

Lloyd M. Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 432 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lloyd M. Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lloyd M. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lloyd M. Smith is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. The scientific work spans primarily the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with additional specialization in chemistry.

Their main subfields of study include molecular biology, spectroscopy, surgery, biomedical engineering, and infectious diseases. Research topics cover a spectrum of advanced proteomics techniques and applications, mass spectrometry techniques, metabolomics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, RNA research and splicing, genomics and phylogenetic studies, and RNA modifications in cancer.

Recent publications illustrate a focus on protein analysis and proteomics, including:

  • The Human Proteoform Project: Defining the human proteome (2021, Science Advances)
  • O-Pair Search with MetaMorpheus for O-glycopeptide characterization (2020, Nature Methods)
  • Interlaboratory Study for Characterizing Monoclonal Antibodies by Top-Down and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry (2020, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry)
  • Putting Humpty Dumpty Back Together Again: What Does Protein Quantification Mean in Bottom-Up Proteomics? (2022, Journal of Proteome Research)
  • An atlas of protein turnover rates in mouse tissues (2021, Nature Communications)

Lloyd M. Smith has frequent co-authors including Michael R. Shortreed, Robert J. Millikin, Mark Scalf, Erin D. Jeffery, and Simone Tiberi, reflecting collaborative research efforts.

Publications are frequently found in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Proteome Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, and Methods in Molecular Biology.

Best Publications

  • Fluorescence detection in automated DNA sequence analysis

    Lloyd M. Smith;Jane Z. Sanders;Robert J. Kaiser;Peter Hughes

  • Proteoform: a single term describing protein complexity

    Lloyd M Smith;Neil L Kelleher

  • How many human proteoforms are there

    Ruedi Aebersold;Jeffrey N. Agar;I. Jonathan Amster;Mark S. Baker

  • Early Warnings of Regime Shifts: A Whole-Ecosystem Experiment

    S. R. Carpenter;J. J. Cole;M. L. Pace;R. Batt

  • DNA-modified nanocrystalline diamond thin-films as stable, biologically active substrates.

    Wensha Yang;Orlando Auciello;James E. Butler;Wei Cai

  • Direct fluorescence analysis of genetic polymorphisms by hybridization with oligonucleotide arrays on glass supports

    Zhen Guo;Richard A. Guilfoyle;Andrew J. Thiel;Renfeng Wang

  • DNA computing on surfaces.

    Qinghua Liu;Liman Wang;Anthony G. Frutos;Anne E. Condon;Anne E. Condon

  • Synthesis and Characterization of DNA-Modified Silicon (111) Surfaces

    Todd Strother;Wei Cai;Xinsheng Zhao;Robert J. Hamers

  • Oligonucleotides possessing a primary amino group in the terminal nucleotide

    Lloyd M. Smith;Steven Fung;Robert J. Kaiser

  • The synthesis of oligonucleotides containing an aliphatic amino group at the 5′ terminus: synthesis of fluorescent DNA primers for use in DNA sequence analysis

    Lloyd M. Smith;Steven Fung;Michael W. Hunkapiller;Tim J. Hunkapiller

  • DNA-reporter conjugates linked via the 2' or 5'-primary amino group of the 5'-terminal nucleoside

    Lloyd M. Smith;Steven Fung;Robert J. Kaiser

  • Sirt3 Promotes the Urea Cycle and Fatty Acid Oxidation during Dietary Restriction

    William C. Hallows;Wei Yu;Brian C. Smith;Mark K. Devries

  • Formaldehyde Crosslinking: A Tool for the Study of Chromatin Complexes

    Elizabeth A. Hoffman;Brian L. Frey;Lloyd M. Smith;David T. Auble

  • Covalent attachment of oligodeoxyribonucleotides to amine-modified Si (001) surfaces

    Todd Strother;Robert J. Hamers;Lloyd M. Smith

  • Single-nucleotide Polymorphism Analysis by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

    Timothy J Griffin;Lloyd M Smith

  • In Situ Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging Detection of DNA Hybridization to Oligonucleotide Arrays on Gold Surfaces

    Andrew J. Thiel;Anthony G. Frutos;Claire E. Jordan;and Robert M. Corn

  • Automated DNA sequencing technique

    Lloyd M. Smith;Leroy E. Hood;Michael W. Hunkapiller;Tim J. Hunkapiller

  • Demonstration of a word design strategy for DNA computing on surfaces.

    Anthony G. Frutos;Qinghua Liu;Andrew J. Thiel;Anne Marie W. Sanner

  • High-speed separations of DNA sequencing reactions by capillary electrophoresis

    Howard. Drossman;John A. Luckey;Anthony J. Kostichka;Jonathan. D'Cunha

  • High speed DNA sequencing by capillary electrophoresis

    John A. Luckey;Howard Drossman;Anthony J. Kostichka;David A. Mead

Frequent Co-Authors

Leroy Hood
Leroy Hood University of Washington
Robert J. Hamers
Robert J. Hamers University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard D. Vierstra
Richard D. Vierstra Washington University in St. Louis
Michael W. Hunkapiller
Michael W. Hunkapiller Pacific Biosciences (United States)
Robert M. Corn
Robert M. Corn University of California, Irvine
Neil L. Kelleher
Neil L. Kelleher Northwestern University
Timothy J. Griffin
Timothy J. Griffin University of Minnesota
Ying Ge
Ying Ge University of Wisconsin–Madison
Anne Condon
Anne Condon University of British Columbia
Wei Cai
Wei Cai Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of healthcare and science careers. Online programs now let you fast-track your education without having to relocate or pause your existing commitments.

If you already hold an advanced degree and want to grow in psychiatric healthcare, the fastest post master's pmhnp programs offer a convenient pathway to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. Similarly, those interested in primary care can find the shortest online nurse practitioner program options, allowing registered nurses to earn their credentials quickly and efficiently.

Nutrition and dietetics are also growing fields for biology and biochemistry graduates. Many opt for an accelerated nutrition degree online to gain skills and certifications that are increasingly in demand in both clinical and wellness settings.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, the easiest rn to bsn program options provide a fast and flexible route toward leadership positions and higher salaries.

Whether you’re targeting a specialist certification or a broader life science role, these online programs help you align your biology or biochemistry background with today’s high-demand healthcare and research careers.

Best Scientists Citing Lloyd M. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles