World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Chad J. Gwaltney

Chad J. Gwaltney

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
11242
World Ranking
7418
National Ranking
4010

Chad J. Gwaltney publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad J. Gwaltney sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Chad J. Gwaltney D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad J. Gwaltney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chad J. Gwaltney is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. The scientist's research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with notable contributions to subfields such as Physiology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Genetics, and Neurology.

Their work covers a range of topics, focusing extensively on Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research, Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus, and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues. Additional research interests include Heart Failure Treatment and Management, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Chad J. Gwaltney include:

  • Effects of Trilaciclib on Chemotherapy-Induced Myelosuppression and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Results from Three Phase II Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies (2021, Clinical Lung Cancer)
  • Living with heart failure: patient experiences and implications for physical activity and daily living (2022, ESC Heart Failure)
  • Understanding the patient experience in hepatocellular carcinoma: a qualitative patient interview study (2021, Quality of Life Research)
  • Qualitative interviews to improve patient-reported outcome measures in late-onset Pompe disease: the patient perspective (2021, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases)
  • Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG laser to minimally invasive surgical technique in the treatment of intrabony defects: Six-month results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled study (2020, Journal of Periodontology)

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with notable co-authors including Robert Krupnick, Alaa Hamed, Ruth Pulikottil-Jacob, Jean Paty, and Nicole Lyn.

Chad J. Gwaltney's work has been published repeatedly in a set of specific journals. These venues include Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, Advances in Therapy, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Value in Health.

Best Publications

  • Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.

    Donald L. Patrick;Laurie B. Burke;Chad J. Gwaltney;Nancy Kline Leidy

  • Content Validity—Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1—Eliciting Concepts for a New PRO Instrument

    Donald L. Patrick;Laurie B. Burke;Chad J. Gwaltney;Nancy Kline Leidy

  • Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review.

    Chad J. Gwaltney;Alan L. Shields;Saul Shiffman

  • Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report

    Stephen Joel Coons;Chad J. Gwaltney;Ron D. Hays;J. Jason Lundy

  • Immediate antecedents of cigarette smoking: An analysis from ecological momentary assessment.

    Saul Shiffman;Chad J. Gwaltney;Mark H. Balabanis;Kenneth S. Liu

  • Self-efficacy and smoking cessation: a meta-analysis.

    Chad J. Gwaltney;Jane Metrik;Christopher W. Kahler;Saul Shiffman

  • Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation.

    Andrew J. Waters;Saul Shiffman;Michael A. Sayette;Jean A. Paty

  • The effect of bupropion on nicotine craving and withdrawal

    S. Shiffman;J. A. Johnston;M. Khayrallah;C. A. Elash

  • Alcohol demand, delayed reward discounting, and craving in relation to drinking and alcohol use disorders.

    James MacKillop;Robert Miranda Jr.;Peter M. Monti;Lara A. Ray

  • Dynamic self-efficacy and outcome expectancies: prediction of smoking lapse and relapse.

    Chad J. Gwaltney;Saul Shiffman;Mark H. Balabanis;Jean A. Paty

  • Dynamic effects of self-efficacy on smoking lapse and relapse.

    Saul Shiffman;Mark H. Balabanis;Jean A. Paty;John Engberg

  • Prediction of lapse from associations between smoking and situational antecedents assessed by ecological momentary assessment.

    Saul Shiffman;Saul Shiffman;Mark H. Balabanis;Chad J. Gwaltney;Chad J. Gwaltney;Jean A. Paty;Jean A. Paty

  • Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking

    Peter M. Monti;Nancy P. Barnett;Suzanne M. Colby;Chad J. Gwaltney

  • Cue-provoked craving and nicotine replacement therapy in smoking cessation.

    Andrew J. Waters;Saul Shiffman;Michael A. Sayette;Jean A. Paty

  • Analyzing milestones in smoking cessation: illustration in a nicotine patch trial in adult smokers.

    Saul Shiffman;Deborah M. Scharf;William G. Shadel;Chad J. Gwaltney

  • Cognitive and social learning models of drug dependence: implications for the assessment of tobacco dependence in adolescents.

    Thomas H. Brandon;Thaddeus A. Herzog;Jennifer E. Irvin;Chad J. Gwaltney

  • Does smoking abstinence self-efficacy vary across situations? Identifying context-specificity within the Relapse Situation Efficacy Questionnaire.

    Chad J. Gwaltney;Saul Shiffman;Gregory J. Norman;Jean A. Paty

  • Moderators of Naltrexone’s Effects on Drinking, Urge, and Alcohol Effects in Non‐Treatment‐Seeking Heavy Drinkers in the Natural Environment

    Jennifer W. Tidey;Peter M. Monti;Damaris J. Rohsenow;Chad J. Gwaltney

  • Reduction of abstinence-induced withdrawal and craving using high-dose nicotine replacement therapy.

    Saul Shiffman;Stuart G. Ferguson;Chad J. Gwaltney;Mark H. Balabanis

  • Polymorphisms of the mu-opioid receptor and dopamine D4 receptor genes and subjective responses to alcohol in the natural environment.

    Lara A. Ray;Robert Miranda;Jennifer W. Tidey;John E. McGeary

Frequent Co-Authors

Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Peter M. Monti
Peter M. Monti Brown University
Jean Paty
Jean Paty IQVIA (United Kingdom)
Suzanne M. Colby
Suzanne M. Colby Brown University
Damaris J. Rohsenow
Damaris J. Rohsenow Brown University
Robert Miranda
Robert Miranda Brown University
Jennifer W. Tidey
Jennifer W. Tidey Brown University
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Nancy P. Barnett
Nancy P. Barnett Brown University
Lara A. Ray
Lara A. Ray University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in psychology in the USA, it’s important to explore related online degrees and career options, such as counseling, therapy, and guidance services. Many universities offer accredited online counseling programs that allow you to specialize in areas like school counseling, mental health, or career advising. These pathways can help you develop practical skills and boost your employability in a growing number of fields.

Prospective students can evaluate programs based on factors like curriculum quality, faculty expertise, and licensure preparation. For instance, you can compare the best college counseling programs in the Northeast or explore the best counseling degree programs in New York for regional options. If you’re interested in studying elsewhere, review the best counseling program rankings in Ohio or the best counseling degree programs in Oklahoma.

These resources will help you identify flexible online learning options and connect you with programs that align with your professional goals, setting you on the right path toward a rewarding career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Chad J. Gwaltney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles