World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
18965
World Ranking
17733
National Ranking
668

Dirk Troost publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Troost sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 220 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Dirk Troost D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Troost sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dirk Troost is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. Troost's work addresses several subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Physiology, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research topics focus on areas such as Heat Shock Proteins research, Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, and Autophagy in Disease and Therapy.

Troost has contributed to a number of publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • Hsp90-mediated regulation of DYRK3 couples stress granule disassembly and growth via mTORC1 signaling, 2021, published in EMBO Reports
  • Aggregates of RNA Binding Proteins and ER Chaperones Linked to Exosomes in Granulovacuolar Degeneration of the Alzheimer's Disease Brain, 2020, published in Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Frequent co-authors in Troost's work are:

  • Priyanka Tripathi
  • Eleonora Aronica
  • Anand Goswami
  • Laura Mediani
  • Francesco Antoniani

The main publication venues where Troost's work appears include EMBO Reports and the Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Best Publications

  • Integrated Genomics Identifies Five Medulloblastoma Subtypes with Distinct Genetic Profiles, Pathway Signatures and Clinicopathological Features

    Marcel Kool;Jan Koster;Jens Bunt;Nancy E. Hasselt

  • Phosphorylation of S409/410 of TDP-43 is a consistent feature in all sporadic and familial forms of TDP-43 proteinopathies

    Manuela Neumann;Manuela Neumann;Linda K. Kwong;Edward B. Lee;Elisabeth Kremmer

  • TDP-43 in familial and sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin inclusions.

    Nigel J. Cairns;Manuela Neumann;Manuela Neumann;Eileen H. Bigio;Ida E. Holm

  • IDH1 mutations at residue p.R132 (IDH1(R132)) occur frequently in high-grade gliomas but not in other solid tumors.

    Fonnet E. Bleeker;Simona Lamba;Sieger Leenstra;Dirk Troost

  • Familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with frontotemporal dementia is linked to a locus on chromosome 9p13.2–21.3

    Caroline Vance;Ammar Al-Chalabi;Deborah Ruddy;Bradley N. Smith

  • The IL-1β system in epilepsy-associated malformations of cortical development

    T. Ravizza;K. Boer;S. Redeker;W.G.M. Spliet

  • Dipeptide repeat protein pathology in C9ORF72 mutation cases: clinico-pathological correlations

    Ian R. Mackenzie;Thomas Arzberger;Thomas Arzberger;Elisabeth Kremmer;Elisabeth Kremmer;Dirk Troost

  • Upregulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype mGluR3 and mGluR5 in reactive astrocytes in a rat model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Eleonora Aronica;Erwin A. Van Vliet;Oleg A. Mayboroda;Dirk Troost

  • Expression and functional role of mGluR3 and mGluR5 in human astrocytes and glioma cells: opposite regulation of glutamate transporter proteins.

    Eleonora Aronica;Jan A. Gorter;Helen Ijlst-Keizers;Annemieke J. Rozemuller

  • The prognostic IDH1 R132 mutation is associated with reduced NADP + -dependent IDH activity in glioblastoma

    Fonnet E. Bleeker;Nadia A. Atai;Simona Lamba;Ard Jonker

  • NLRP3 Inflammasome Is Expressed by Astrocytes in the SOD1 Mouse Model of ALS and in Human Sporadic ALS Patients

    Sonja Johann;Marius Heitzer;Mithila Kanagaratnam;Anand Goswami

  • Expression and Cellular Distribution of Multidrug Resistance–related Proteins in the Hippocampus of Patients with Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Eleonora Aronica;Jan A. Gorter;Marja Ramkema;Sandra Redeker

  • Inflammatory processes in cortical tubers and subependymal giant cell tumors of tuberous sclerosis complex.

    K. Boer;F. Jansen;M. Nellist;S. Redeker

  • Expression and cellular distribution of multidrug transporter proteins in two major causes of medically intractable epilepsy: focal cortical dysplasia and glioneuronal tumors.

    E.M.A. Aronica;J.A. Gorter;G.H. Jansen;C.W.M. van Veelen

  • Toll-like receptor signaling in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord tissue.

    M. Casula;A.M. Iyer;W.G.M. Spliet;J.J. Anink

  • Impaired DNA damage response signaling by FUS-NLS mutations leads to neurodegeneration and FUS aggregate formation

    Marcel Naumann;Arun Pal;Anand Goswami;Xenia Lojewski

  • Complement activation in experimental and human temporal lobe epilepsy.

    E. Aronica;K. Boer;E.A. van Vliet;S. Redeker

  • The combination of IDH1 mutations and MGMT methylation status predicts survival in glioblastoma better than either IDH1 or MGMT alone

    Remco J. Molenaar;Dagmar Verbaan;Simona Lamba;Carlo Zanon

  • The genomic profile of human malignant glioma is altered early in primary cell culture and preserved in spheroids

    P C De Witt Hamer;A A G Van Tilborg;P P Eijk;P Sminia

  • Quantitative analysis and clinico-pathological correlations of different dipeptide repeat protein pathologies in C9ORF72 mutation carriers

    Ian R. A. Mackenzie;Petra Frick;Friedrich A. Grässer;Tania F. Gendron

Frequent Co-Authors

Eleonora Aronica
Eleonora Aronica University of Amsterdam
Jan A. Gorter
Jan A. Gorter University of Amsterdam
Frank Baas
Frank Baas Leiden University Medical Center
Joachim Weis
Joachim Weis RWTH Aachen University
Peter C. van Rijen
Peter C. van Rijen Utrecht University
Manuela Neumann
Manuela Neumann University of Tübingen
Cornelis J.F. Van Noorden
Cornelis J.F. Van Noorden University of Amsterdam
Dick F. Swaab
Dick F. Swaab Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
Alberto Bardelli
Alberto Bardelli University of Turin
Erwin A. van Vliet
Erwin A. van Vliet University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or supplementary educational pathways can be valuable for those interested in healthcare careers beyond a traditional medical degree. Many students seek flexibility and specialization, making online degree programs increasingly popular.

Registered nurses looking to advance their careers may consider rn to fnp bridge programs, which provide a streamlined route to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. Likewise, RNs seeking a bachelor's degree can benefit from rn to bsn online no clinicals, offering academic progression with maximum flexibility for working adults.

For those interested in wellness and dietetics, an online nutrition degree opens doors to roles in health education, clinical settings, and research. Additionally, healthcare professionals aiming for leadership roles might explore whats the best online mha program for working adults to gain management skills while balancing work and study.

These diverse online options empower students and professionals to tailor their medical career pathways according to their interests and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Troost

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles