World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 59 3384 3116 1565 1431 175 18738

Daniel J. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel J. Campbell between 1953 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel J. Campbell published across 73 years, from 1953 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 137 publications in 2012. 22 of the 339 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1953 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 137. Peak 137 publications in 2012. 1953: 2 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 137 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 7 publications
1953 2025

339 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel J. Campbell: publications per year, 1953 to 2025
Year Publications
1953 2
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 5
2004 3
2005 2
2006 6
2007 6
2008 2
2009 9
2010 6
2011 7
2012 137
2013 8
2014 14
2015 10
2016 7
2017 5
2018 9
2019 16
2020 14
2021 20
2022 7
2023 11
2024 15
2025 7
Total 339
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Campbell publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 172–181 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 175 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181 175
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Campbell D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201 59
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Immune system
  • Cytokine
  • T cell

His main research concerns Immunology, FOXP3, Immune system, Inflammation and Cytokine. His studies in FOXP3 integrate themes in fields like Interleukin 21, IL-2 receptor and Cell biology. Aldesleukin and Immune tolerance is closely connected to Regulatory T cell in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Cell biology.

While the research belongs to areas of Immune system, Daniel J. Campbell spends his time largely on the problem of Homeostasis, intersecting his research to questions surrounding CXCR3, Innate lymphoid cell, Autoimmunity and Autoimmune disease. Daniel J. Campbell integrates Inflammation and Downregulation and upregulation in his studies. His Cytokine research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Immunoglobulin E, Cancer research, Pathogenesis and Atopic dermatitis.

His most cited work include:

  • The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation (922 citations)
  • The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation (922 citations)
  • Thymic stromal lymphopoietin as a key initiator of allergic airway inflammation in mice. (695 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Immunology, Cell biology, FOXP3, T cell and Immune system. His Immunology and Inflammation, IL-2 receptor, Antigen, Immunity and Autoimmune disease investigations all form part of his Immunology research activities. In general Cell biology study, his work on Effector and Function often relates to the realm of Chemistry, Cellular differentiation and Downregulation and upregulation, thereby connecting several areas of interest.

His FOXP3 research incorporates elements of Proinflammatory cytokine, Immune tolerance, Signal transduction, Regulatory T cell and Interleukin 12. His work investigates the relationship between T cell and topics such as Molecular biology that intersect with problems in C-C chemokine receptor type 6. His work in Immune system addresses subjects such as Cytokine, which are connected to disciplines such as Chemokine.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Immunology (97.86%)
  • Cell biology (55.71%)
  • FOXP3 (50.71%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Immunology (97.86%)
  • Immune system (42.86%)
  • Effector (31.43%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Immunology, Immune system, Effector, Cell biology and Antibody. His research on Immunology frequently connects to adjacent areas such as Costimulatory blockade. He has researched Immune system in several fields, including Disease, Disease Presentation, Mass cytometry and Cohort.

His research in Cell biology intersects with topics in Cytokine, Tissue homeostasis, Humanized mouse, Regulatory T cell and FOXP3. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and Chemokine receptor. The various areas that Daniel J. Campbell examines in his Antibody study include Virus and Antigen.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Persists after Mild COVID-19. (128 citations)
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Persists after Mild COVID-19. (128 citations)
  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19 (34 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Immune system
  • Cytokine
  • T cell

Daniel J. Campbell mainly focuses on Antibody, Virus, Antigen, Immunology and Herd immunity. His Antibody research incorporates themes from Acquired immune system, Immunity and Memory T cell. Daniel J. Campbell integrates many fields in his works, including Herd immunity, Immunological memory and Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Best Publications

  • The transcription factor T-bet controls regulatory T cell homeostasis and function during type 1 inflammation

    Meghan A Koch;Meghan A Koch;Glady's Tucker-Heard;Nikole R Perdue;Justin R Killebrew;Justin R Killebrew

  • Compartmentalized Control of Skin Immunity by Resident Commensals

    Shruti Naik;Nicolas Bouladoux;Christoph Wilhelm;Michael J. Molloy

  • Thymic stromal lymphopoietin as a key initiator of allergic airway inflammation in mice.

    Baohua Zhou;Michael R Comeau;Thibaut De Smedt;H Denny Liggitt

  • Phenotypical and functional specialization of FOXP3 + regulatory T cells

    Daniel J. Campbell;Meghan A. Koch

  • Subspecialization of Cxcr5+ T Cells: B Helper Activity Is Focused in a Germinal Center–Localized Subset of Cxcr5+ T Cells

    Chang H. Kim;Chang H. Kim;Lusijah S. Rott;Lusijah S. Rott;Ian Clark-Lewis;Daniel J. Campbell;Daniel J. Campbell

  • Regulatory T cells: recommendations to simplify the nomenclature

    Abul K Abbas;Christophe Benoist;Jeffrey A Bluestone;Daniel J Campbell

  • Rapid Acquisition of Tissue-specific Homing Phenotypes by CD4+ T Cells Activated in Cutaneous or Mucosal Lymphoid Tissues

    Daniel J. Campbell;Eugene C. Butcher;Eugene C. Butcher

  • Spontaneous atopic dermatitis in mice expressing an inducible thymic stromal lymphopoietin transgene specifically in the skin

    Jane Yoo;Miyuki Omori;Dora Gyarmati;Baohua Zhou

  • Functional SARS-CoV-2-Specific Immune Memory Persists after Mild COVID-19.

    Lauren B. Rodda;Jason Netland;Laila Shehata;Kurt B. Pruner

  • Altering the distribution of Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells results in tissue-specific inflammatory disease.

    Blythe D. Sather;Piper R. Treuting;Nikole R. Perdue;Mike Miazgowicz

  • Functionally distinct subsets of human FOXP3+ Treg cells that phenotypically mirror effector Th cells.

    Thomas Duhen;Thomas Duhen;Rebekka Duhen;Rebekka Duhen;Antonio Lanzavecchia;Federica Sallusto

  • CCR7 provides localized access to IL-2 and defines homeostatically distinct regulatory T cell subsets

    Kate S. Smigiel;Elizabeth Richards;Shivani Srivastava;Shivani Srivastava;Kerri R. Thomas

  • Chemokines in the systemic organization of immunity.

    Daniel J. Campbell;Chang H. Kim;Eugene C. Butcher;Eugene C. Butcher

  • Recirculating Intestinal IgA-Producing Cells Regulate Neuroinflammation via IL-10

    Olga L. Rojas;Anne-Katrin Pröbstel;Elisa A. Porfilio;Angela A. Wang

  • FOXP3 modifies the phenotypic and functional properties of regulatory T cells.

    Daniel J. Campbell;Steven F. Ziegler

  • T-bet+ Treg Cells Undergo Abortive Th1 Cell Differentiation due to Impaired Expression of IL-12 Receptor β2

    Meghan A. Koch;Kerri R. Thomas;Nikole R. Perdue;Kate S. Smigiel;Kate S. Smigiel

  • Human CD4+CD103+ cutaneous resident memory T cells are found in the circulation of healthy individuals

    Maria M. Klicznik;Peter A. Morawski;Barbara Höllbacher;Barbara Höllbacher;Suraj R. Varkhande

  • Chemokines in Lymphocyte Trafficking and Intestinal Immunity

    Eric J. Kunkel;Daniel J. Campbell;Eugene C. Butcher

  • Control of Regulatory T Cell Migration, Function, and Homeostasis.

    Daniel J. Campbell

  • Foxp3+ regulatory T cells maintain immune homeostasis in the skin

    Jan C. Dudda;Nikole Perdue;Eva Bachtanian;Daniel J. Campbell;Daniel J. Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven F. Ziegler
Steven F. Ziegler Virginia Mason Medical Center
Alexander Y. Rudensky
Alexander Y. Rudensky Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jane H. Buckner
Jane H. Buckner Virginia Mason Medical Center
Leonidas Stamatatos
Leonidas Stamatatos Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Eugene C. Butcher
Eugene C. Butcher Stanford University
Laurence A. Turka
Laurence A. Turka Harvard University
Shimon Sakaguchi
Shimon Sakaguchi Osaka University
Michael Gale
Michael Gale University of Washington
David J. Rawlings
David J. Rawlings Seattle Children's Hospital
David G. Brooks
David G. Brooks University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Immunology opens doors to various advanced healthcare roles, many of which are accessible through specialized online degrees. For nurses aiming to expand their expertise into mental health, exploring pmhnp programs online with best clinical placement can provide both strong educational foundations and practical experience essential for success.

Cost often plays a key role in choosing the right program. Prospective students can compare options like the cheapest psychiatric nurse practitioner programs, which balance affordability with quality, allowing a smoother entry into psychiatric and immunology-related nursing careers.

Understanding the financial benefits tied to specific specialties is crucial. For example, nurses with a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree should review the dnp salary by specialty to identify which immunology or nurse practitioner careers offer the most competitive salaries in their state.

For those already established as Family Nurse Practitioners, shifting focus is feasible through bridge programs. The fnp to acute care np bridge program route provides a streamlined path to specialize further in acute and immunology-related care, expanding clinical skills and job opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles