| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 7790 | 7268 | 4185 | 3805 | 76 | 9191 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Dan S. Chiaburu between 2004 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dan S. Chiaburu published across 18 years, from 2004 to 2021, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2008. 1 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.
80 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 4 |
| 2007 | 2 |
| 2008 | 11 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 7 |
| 2011 | 6 |
| 2012 | 6 |
| 2013 | 9 |
| 2014 | 10 |
| 2015 | 11 |
| 2016 | 4 |
| 2017 | 3 |
| 2018 | 1 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1 |
| Total | 80 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan S. Chiaburu sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile
7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 31–40 | 6 | |
| 41–50 | 52 | |
| 51–60 | 138 | |
| 61–70 | 299 | |
| 71–80 | 461 | 76 |
| 81–90 | 605 | |
| 91–100 | 713 | |
| 101–110 | 736 | |
| 111–120 | 686 | |
| 121–130 | 670 | |
| 131–140 | 644 | |
| 141–150 | 597 | |
| 151–160 | 576 | |
| 161–170 | 477 | |
| 171–180 | 450 | |
| 181–190 | 397 | |
| 191–200 | 343 | |
| 201–210 | 328 | |
| 211–220 | 313 | |
| 221–230 | 283 | |
| 231–240 | 226 | |
| 241–250 | 196 | |
| 251–260 | 201 | |
| 261–270 | 171 | |
| 271–280 | 151 | |
| 281–290 | 139 | |
| 291–300 | 113 | |
| 301–310 | 102 | |
| 311–320 | 100 | |
| 321–330 | 76 | |
| 331–340 | 92 | |
| 341–350 | 85 | |
| 351–360 | 69 | |
| 361–370 | 71 | |
| 371–380 | 63 | |
| 381–390 | 58 | |
| 391–400 | 57 | |
| 401–410 | 43 | |
| 411–420 | 33 | |
| 421–430 | 50 | |
| 431–440 | 41 | |
| 441–450 | 32 | |
| 451–460 | 27 | |
| 461–470 | 28 | |
| 471–480 | 25 | |
| 481–490 | 28 | |
| 491–500 | 20 | |
| 501–510 | 23 | |
| 511–520 | 26 | |
| 521–530 | 17 | |
| 531–540 | 21 | |
| 541–550 | 14 | |
| 551–560 | 16 | |
| 561–570 | 10 | |
| 571–580 | 22 | |
| 581–590 | 9 | |
| 591–600 | 14 | |
| 601–610 | 9 | |
| 611–620 | 11 | |
| 621–630 | 4 | |
| 631–640 | 7 | |
| 641–650 | 5 | |
| 651–660 | 10 | |
| 661–670 | 8 | |
| 671–680 | 8 | |
| 681–690 | 4 | |
| 691–700 | 3 | |
| 701–704 | 4 | |
| 705+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan S. Chiaburu sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile
33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 398 | |
| 32–33 | 702 | |
| 34–35 | 671 | |
| 36–37 | 659 | |
| 38–39 | 641 | |
| 40–41 | 671 | 41 |
| 42–43 | 617 | |
| 44–45 | 558 | |
| 46–47 | 495 | |
| 48–49 | 487 | |
| 50–51 | 445 | |
| 52–53 | 390 | |
| 54–55 | 408 | |
| 56–57 | 345 | |
| 58–59 | 325 | |
| 60–61 | 321 | |
| 62–63 | 248 | |
| 64–65 | 290 | |
| 66–67 | 218 | |
| 68–69 | 219 | |
| 70–71 | 215 | |
| 72–73 | 183 | |
| 74–75 | 169 | |
| 76–77 | 132 | |
| 78–79 | 137 | |
| 80–81 | 120 | |
| 82–83 | 112 | |
| 84–85 | 86 | |
| 86–87 | 101 | |
| 88–89 | 83 | |
| 90–91 | 77 | |
| 92–93 | 70 | |
| 94–95 | 78 | |
| 96–97 | 58 | |
| 98–99 | 53 | |
| 100–101 | 57 | |
| 102–103 | 48 | |
| 104–105 | 53 | |
| 106–107 | 46 | |
| 108–109 | 24 | |
| 110–111 | 35 | |
| 112–113 | 27 | |
| 114–115 | 32 | |
| 116–117 | 31 | |
| 118–119 | 22 | |
| 120–121 | 16 | |
| 122–123 | 24 | |
| 124–125 | 18 | |
| 126–127 | 11 | |
| 128–129 | 19 | |
| 130–131 | 10 | |
| 132–133 | 16 | |
| 134–135 | 10 | |
| 136–137 | 12 | |
| 138–139 | 8 | |
| 140–141 | 5 | |
| 142–143 | 12 | |
| 144+ | 98 |
Dan S. Chiaburu is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, with a specific focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Additional subfields include Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science.
The scientist's main topics of study encompass Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Workaholism, burnout, and well-being, Social and Cultural Dynamics, and Organizational Learning and Leadership.
Recent publications by Dan S. Chiaburu include the following papers:
Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Dan S. Chiaburu are:
Most of the scientist's work has been published in the following venues:
Dan S. Chiaburu;David A. Harrison
Ethan R. Burris;James R. Detert;Dan S. Chiaburu
Dan S. Chiaburu;Sophia V. Marinova
Ismael Diaz;Dan S. Chiaburu;Ryan D. Zimmerman;Wendy R. Boswell
Unknown
Dan S. Chiaburu;Douglas R. Lindsay
P. Matthijs Bal;Dan S. Chiaburu;Paul G.W. Jansen
Unknown
Anne Scaduto;Douglas Lindsay;Dan S. Chiaburu
Dan S. Chiaburu;Natalia M. Lorinkova;Linn Van Dyne
Ning Li;Dan S. Chiaburu;Bradley L. Kirkman;Zhitao Xie
Ning Li;Dan S. Chiaburu;Bradley L. Kirkman
Wade M Danis;Dan S Chiaburu;Marjorie A Lyles
Sophia V. Marinova;Chunyan Peng;Natalia Lorinkova;Linn Van Dyne
Unknown
Zinta S. Byrne;Bryan J. Dik;Dan S. Chiaburu
Unknown
Dan S. Chiaburu;Audrey S. Lim
Jason L. Huang;Dan S. Chiaburu;Xin an Zhang;Ning Li
Unknown
Dan S. Chiaburu;Sophia V. Marinova;Audrey S. Lim
Meredith F. Burnett;Dan S. Chiaburu;Debra L. Shapiro;Ning Li
Dan S. Chiaburu;Sophia V. Marinova;Linn Van Dyne
Ning Li;Murray R. Barrick;Ryan D. Zimmerman;Dan S. Chiaburu
P.M. Bal;D.S. Chiaburu;P.G.W. Jansen
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Studying Psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degrees and career avenues, especially in health and education. Many graduates pursue advanced specialties such as speech-language pathology, where licensure and certification vary by state.
For those interested in this rewarding field, understanding each state’s requirements is crucial. For example, learn how to become a speech language pathologist in Michigan, including the necessary education and clinical experience. In Minnesota, aspiring professionals must meet specific Minnesota slp certification requirements to begin practicing.
Certification pathways can also differ significantly in southern states. Explore what is needed to meet Mississippi slp certification requirements, which outline required exams and supervised clinical hours. If you’re considering options in the Midwest, take time to review Missouri speech pathologist certification requirements before applying to programs.
By researching and comparing these pathways, students and professionals can choose the best route to match their career goals and personal circumstances.
The Ohio State University
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
University of East Anglia
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
The University of Texas at Austin
University of Kentucky
National Institutes of Health
University of California, Davis
University of Lyon System
University of Manchester
University of Salerno
Deutsches Museum
Australian National University
Flinders University
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research