World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
9191
World Ranking
7790
National Ranking
4185

Dan S. Chiaburu publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan S. Chiaburu sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dan S. Chiaburu D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan S. Chiaburu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dan S. Chiaburu is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, with a specific focus on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Additional subfields include Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science.

The scientist's main topics of study encompass Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Workaholism, burnout, and well-being, Social and Cultural Dynamics, and Organizational Learning and Leadership.

Recent publications by Dan S. Chiaburu include the following papers:

  • Happy to help, happy to change? A meta-analysis of major predictors of affiliative and change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Happy to Help, Happy to Change? A Meta-Analysis of Major Predictors of Affiliative and Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Dan S. Chiaburu are:

  • In-Sue Oh
  • Adam C. Stoverink
  • Hyesoo Park
  • Cody Bradley
  • Brenda A. Barros-Rivera

Most of the scientist's work has been published in the following venues:

  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance.

    Dan S. Chiaburu;David A. Harrison

  • Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice.

    Ethan R. Burris;James R. Detert;Dan S. Chiaburu

  • What predicts skill transfer? An exploratory study of goal orientation, training self-efficacy and organizational supports

    Dan S. Chiaburu;Sophia V. Marinova

  • Communication technology: Pros and cons of constant connection to work

    Ismael Diaz;Dan S. Chiaburu;Ryan D. Zimmerman;Wendy R. Boswell

  • Individual and contextual influences on multiple dimensions of training effectiveness

    Unknown

  • Can do or will do? The importance of self-efficacy and instrumentality for training transfer

    Dan S. Chiaburu;Douglas R. Lindsay

  • Psychological contract breach and work performance: Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier?

    P. Matthijs Bal;Dan S. Chiaburu;Paul G.W. Jansen

  • Social Support in the Workplace and Training Transfer: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Unknown

  • Leader influences on training effectiveness: motivation and outcome expectation processes

    Anne Scaduto;Douglas Lindsay;Dan S. Chiaburu

  • Employees' Social Context and Change- Oriented Citizenship: A Meta-Analysis of Leader, Coworker, and Organizational Influences

    Dan S. Chiaburu;Natalia M. Lorinkova;Linn Van Dyne

  • Spotlight on the Followers: An Examination of Moderators of Relationships Between Transformational Leadership and Subordinates’ Citizenship and Taking Charge

    Ning Li;Dan S. Chiaburu;Bradley L. Kirkman;Zhitao Xie

  • Cross-Level Influences of Empowering Leadership on Citizenship Behavior Organizational Support Climate as a Double-Edged Sword

    Ning Li;Dan S. Chiaburu;Bradley L. Kirkman

  • The impact of managerial networking intensity and market-based strategies on firm growth during institutional upheaval: A study of small and medium-sized enterprises in a transition economy

    Wade M Danis;Dan S Chiaburu;Marjorie A Lyles

  • Change-oriented behavior: A meta-analysis of individual and job design predictors

    Sophia V. Marinova;Chunyan Peng;Natalia Lorinkova;Linn Van Dyne

  • Alienation and its correlates: A meta-analysis

    Unknown

  • Alternatives to traditional mentoring in fostering career success

    Zinta S. Byrne;Bryan J. Dik;Dan S. Chiaburu

  • Beyond being proactive: what (else) matters for career self‐management behaviors?

    Unknown

  • Manager Trustworthiness or Interactional Justice? Predicting Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

    Dan S. Chiaburu;Audrey S. Lim

  • Rising to the challenge: Deep acting is more beneficial when tasks are appraised as challenging.

    Jason L. Huang;Dan S. Chiaburu;Xin an Zhang;Ning Li

  • Organizational Support and Citizenship Behaviors: A Comparative Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis

    Unknown

  • Helping and proactive extra-role behaviors: The influence of motives, goal orientation, and social context

    Dan S. Chiaburu;Sophia V. Marinova;Audrey S. Lim

  • Revisiting How and When Perceived Organizational Support Enhances Taking Charge An Inverted U-Shaped Perspective

    Meredith F. Burnett;Dan S. Chiaburu;Debra L. Shapiro;Ning Li

  • SHOULD I DO IT OR NOT? AN INITIAL MODEL OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES PREDICTING VOICE BEHAVIORS.

    Dan S. Chiaburu;Sophia V. Marinova;Linn Van Dyne

  • Retaining the Productive Employee: The Role of Personality

    Ning Li;Murray R. Barrick;Ryan D. Zimmerman;Dan S. Chiaburu

  • Psychological contract breach and work performance: Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier?

    P.M. Bal;D.S. Chiaburu;P.G.W. Jansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Zinta S. Byrne
Zinta S. Byrne Colorado State University
Bryan J. Dik
Bryan J. Dik Colorado State University
David A. Harrison
David A. Harrison The University of Texas at Austin
Paul Jansen
Paul Jansen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Linn Van Dyne
Linn Van Dyne Michigan State University
P. Matthijs Bal
P. Matthijs Bal University of Lincoln
Barbara Gray
Barbara Gray Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens up diverse online degrees and career avenues, especially in health and education. Many graduates pursue advanced specialties such as speech-language pathology, where licensure and certification vary by state.

For those interested in this rewarding field, understanding each state’s requirements is crucial. For example, learn how to become a speech language pathologist in Michigan, including the necessary education and clinical experience. In Minnesota, aspiring professionals must meet specific Minnesota slp certification requirements to begin practicing.

Certification pathways can also differ significantly in southern states. Explore what is needed to meet Mississippi slp certification requirements, which outline required exams and supervised clinical hours. If you’re considering options in the Midwest, take time to review Missouri speech pathologist certification requirements before applying to programs.

By researching and comparing these pathways, students and professionals can choose the best route to match their career goals and personal circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Dan S. Chiaburu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles