World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1389 1239 651 572 116 77235

Anthony S. Bryk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony S. Bryk between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony S. Bryk published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2001. 3 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2001. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1976 2025

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anthony S. Bryk: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 3
1985 1
1986 2
1987 2
1988 8
1989 7
1990 1
1991 3
1992 2
1993 8
1994 6
1995 3
1996 3
1997 3
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 9
2002 4
2003 1
2004 4
2005 0
2006 2
2007 0
2008 2
2009 1
2010 5
2011 2
2012 2
2013 3
2014 1
2015 2
2016 2
2017 3
2018 5
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 3
Total 121
Download as CSV

Anthony S. Bryk publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony S. Bryk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 116
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Anthony S. Bryk D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony S. Bryk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 2003 - Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 2003 - Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 1991 - Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Anthony S. Bryk is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences and decision sciences, with a notable focus on educational assessment and improvement as well as evaluation and performance assessment.

Their scholarly contributions include six recent papers published in 2025, predominantly featured in the Peabody Journal of Education. These works explore themes related to educational improvement networks, measurement of educators' benefits, and the design of systems to support network development. The following papers illustrate their recent output:

  • "Catalyzing Scientific-Professional Learning Communities: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Health and Development of Educational Improvement Networks," 2025, Peabody Journal of Education
  • "Examining the Validity of Practical Measures of Improvement Network Health and Development," 2025, Peabody Journal of Education
  • "Measuring Educators' Perceived Benefits of Participation in Educational Improvement Networks," 2025, Peabody Journal of Education
  • "Bringing Scientific-Professional Learning Communities into Practice: Exploring Variation in Educational Improvement Network Health and Development," 2025, Peabody Journal of Education
  • "The Design of an Information System to Support Network Development," 2025, Peabody Journal of Education

Frequent coauthors include Jennifer Lin Russell, Jennifer Zoltners Sherer, Donald J. Peurach, David Sherer, and Angel Yee-lam Li. This indicates a collaborative research approach across multiple studies and projects related to educational improvement and organizational learning.

The main fields of study for Bryk are:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Their work also covers several subfields such as:

  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Education
  • General Health Professions
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Key topics addressed in their research include:

  • Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Community Health and Development
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Online Learning and Analytics

Anthony S. Bryk's research has been published mainly in the Peabody Journal of Education, with additional work appearing in the Revue internationale d éducation de Sèvres and Phi Delta Kappan.

Recognition for their contributions includes several honors, such as being named Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2011 and Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2008. They have also received the Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award twice from the American Educational Research Association, in 1991 and 2003, along with the Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.

    Nicholas T. Longford;Anthony S. Bryk;Stephen W. Raudenbush

  • Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for Improvement

    Anthony S. Bryk;Barbara Schneider

  • Organizing Schools for Improvement.

    Anthony S. Bryk

  • Catholic schools and the common good

    Anthony S. Bryk;Valerie Elizabeth Lee;Peter Blakeley Holland

  • Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender.

    Janellen Huttenlocher;Wendy Haight;Anthony Bryk;Michael Seltzer

  • Application of Hierarchical Linear Models to Assessing Change

    Anthony S. Bryk;Stephen W. Raudenbush

  • Trust in Schools: A Core Resource for School Reform.

    Anthony S. Bryk;Barbara Schneider

  • Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago

    Anthony S. Bryk;Penny Bender Sebring;Elaine Allensworth;Stuart Luppescu

  • A Hierarchical Model for Studying School Effects

    Stephen Raudenbush;Anthony S. Bryk

  • The Effects of High School Organization on Dropping Out: An Exploratory Investigation:

    Anthony S. Bryk;Yeow Meng Thum

  • A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement.

    Valerie E. Lee;Anthony S. Bryk

  • HLM 5 : Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling

    Stephen Raudenbush;Raudenbush;Yuk Fai Cheong;Anthony Bryk

  • Instructional Program Coherence: What It Is and Why It Should Guide School Improvement Policy

    Fred M. Newmann;BetsAnn Smith;Elaine Allensworth;Anthony S. Bryk

  • Chapter 5: The Organization of Effective Secondary Schools

    Valerie E. Lee;Anthony S. Bryk;Julia B. Smith

  • Learning to Improve: How America’s Schools Can Get Better at Getting Better

    Anthony S. Bryk;Louis M. Gomez;Alicia Grunow;Paul G. LeMahieu

  • Authentic Intellectual Work and Standardized Tests: Conflict or Coexistence? Improving Chicago's Schools.

    Fred M. Newmann;Anthony S. Bryk;Jenny K. Nagaoka

  • Comparing Instructional Models for the Literacy Education of High-Risk First Graders

    Carol A. Lyons;Diane E. DeFord;Anthony S. Bryk

  • Effects of Single-Sex Secondary Schools on Student Achievement and Attitudes.

    Valerie E. Lee;Anthony S. Bryk

  • Toward a More Appropriate Conceptualization of Research on School Effects: A Three-Level Hierarchical Linear Model

    Anthony S. Bryk;Stephan W. Raudenbush

  • Getting Ideas into Action: Building Networked Improvement Communities in Education

    Anthony S. Bryk;Louis M. Gomez;Alicia Grunow

  • The Effects of High School Organization on Dropping Out: An Exploratory Investigation. CPRE Research Report Series.

    Anthony S. Bryk;Yeow Meng Thum

Frequent Co-Authors

Elaine Allensworth
Elaine Allensworth University of Chicago
Valerie E. Lee
Valerie E. Lee University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephen W. Raudenbush
Stephen W. Raudenbush University of Chicago
Barbara Schneider
Barbara Schneider Michigan State University
Brian A. Jacob
Brian A. Jacob University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kenneth A. Frank
Kenneth A. Frank Michigan State University
Larry V. Hedges
Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University
Janellen Huttenlocher
Janellen Huttenlocher University of Chicago
Susanna Loeb
Susanna Loeb Brown University
Wendy L. Haight
Wendy L. Haight University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a wide range of opportunities, especially with the increasing availability of flexible online programs. Students interested in counseling should explore cacrep accredited universities to ensure their qualifications are recognized and meet industry standards.

For those drawn to supporting families and relationships, a masters in marriage and family therapy online can provide the skills and credentials necessary for this rewarding field. Likewise, students seeking a broader understanding of human behavior can opt for psychology degrees online with specializations ranging from clinical to organizational psychology.

Those passionate about supporting vulnerable populations might consider a masters in social work online, offering pathways into counseling, advocacy, and community leadership. Each of these online degrees allows for greater accessibility, affordability, and flexibility—key considerations for today’s students looking to advance their education and begin impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony S. Bryk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles