World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thanos D. Halazonetis

Thanos D. Halazonetis

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 71 1344 1197 23 20 157 31744

Thanos D. Halazonetis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thanos D. Halazonetis between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thanos D. Halazonetis published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2023. 9 of the 187 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2023. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 2 publications
1985 2026

187 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thanos D. Halazonetis: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 3
1993 3
1994 0
1995 4
1996 3
1997 3
1998 4
1999 7
2000 8
2001 3
2002 4
2003 4
2004 9
2005 8
2006 5
2007 4
2008 2
2009 6
2010 6
2011 6
2012 6
2013 5
2014 7
2015 3
2016 4
2017 5
2018 4
2019 3
2020 4
2021 5
2022 6
2023 15
2024 6
2025 7
2026 2
Total 187
Download as CSV

Thanos D. Halazonetis publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thanos D. Halazonetis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 157–166 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 157 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159 157
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Thanos D. Halazonetis D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thanos D. Halazonetis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106 71
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Thanos D. Halazonetis is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland. Their research spans primarily the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology with a significant focus on Molecular Biology as a subfield. They also have contributions in Oncology, Cell Biology, Infectious Diseases, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their scholarly work centers on topics including DNA Repair Mechanisms, Cancer-related Molecular Pathways, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Microtubule and mitosis dynamics, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research.

Recent publications by Halazonetis include:

  • "Transcription-replication conflicts underlie sensitivity to PARP inhibitors" (2024, Nature)
  • "High-resolution mapping of mitotic DNA synthesis regions and common fragile sites in the human genome through direct sequencing" (2020, Cell Research)
  • "A multi-pronged approach targeting SARS-CoV-2 proteins using ultra-large virtual screening" (2021, iScience)
  • "Non-covalent SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors developed from in silico screen hits" (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • "Mitotic DNA synthesis is caused by transcription-replication conflicts in BRCA2-deficient cells" (2022, Molecular Cell)

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Vasilis S. Dionellis
  • Giacomo Rossetti
  • Angeliki Karamichali
  • Michalis Petropoulos
  • Sotirios K. Sotiriou

The venues where their research is commonly published are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Molecular Cell
  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research

Halazonetis has also contributed to book publications, including a chapter in the book DNA Replication & DNA Replication Stress published by the American Chemical Society in 2021.

Their professional recognition includes being a member of the Academia Europaea since 2019 and membership in the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO).

Best Publications

  • Genomic instability — an evolving hallmark of cancer

    Simona Negrini;Vassilis G Gorgoulis;Thanos D Halazonetis

  • Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions

    Vassilis G. Gorgoulis;Leandros-Vassilios F. Vassiliou;Panagiotis Karakaidos;Panayotis Zacharatos

  • Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints

    Jirina Bartkova;Nousin Rezaei;Michalis Liontos;Panagiotis Karakaidos

  • An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development.

    Thanos D. Halazonetis;Vassilis G. Gorgoulis;Jiri Bartek

  • c-Jun dimerizes with itself and with c-Fos, forming complexes of different DNA binding affinities.

    Thanos D. Halazonetis;Katia Georgopoulos;Michael E. Greenberg;Philip Leder

  • P53 Binding Protein 1 (53bp1) Is an Early Participant in the Cellular Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks

    Linda B. Schultz;Nabil H. Chehab;Asra Malikzay;Thanos D. Halazonetis;Thanos D. Halazonetis

  • Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53.

    Nabil H. Chehab;Asra Malikzay;Michael Appel;Thanos D. Halazonetis

  • Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks

    Yentram Huyen;Omar Zgheib;Omar Zgheib;Richard A. DiTullio;Richard A. DiTullio;Vassilis G. Gorgoulis;Vassilis G. Gorgoulis

  • p53 sites acetylated in vitro by PCAF and p300 are acetylated in vivo in response to DNA damage.

    Lin Liu;Daniel M. Scolnick;Raymond C. Trievel;Hong Bing Zhang

  • Acetylation of p53 activates transcription through recruitment of coactivators/histone acetyltransferases.

    Nickolai A. Barlev;Lin Liu;Nabil H. Chehab;Kyle Mansfield

  • DNA Replication Stress as a Hallmark of Cancer

    Morgane Macheret;Thanos D. Halazonetis

  • Phosphorylation of Ser-20 mediates stabilization of human p53 in response to DNA damage.

    Nabil H. Chehab;Asra Malikzay;Elena S. Stavridi;Thanos D. Halazonetis

  • ATM-dependent activation of p53 involves dephosphorylation and association with 14-3-3 proteins.

    Matthew J. F. Waterman;Elena S. Stavridi;Jennifer L. F. Waterman;Thanos D. Halazonetis;Thanos D. Halazonetis

  • 53BP1 functions in an ATM-dependent checkpoint pathway that is constitutively activated in human cancer

    Richard A. DiTullio;Tamara A. Mochan;Tamara A. Mochan;Monica Venere;Monica Venere;Jirina Bartkova

  • Chfr defines a mitotic stress checkpoint that delays entry into metaphase

    Daniel M. Scolnick;Thanos D. Halazonetis

  • Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic MAP2K1 and MAP2K2 mutations in melanoma

    Sergey Igorievich Nikolaev;Donata Rimoldi;Christian Iseli;Christian Iseli;Armand Valsesia;Armand Valsesia;Armand Valsesia

  • Break-Induced Replication Repair of Damaged Forks Induces Genomic Duplications in Human Cells

    Lorenzo Costantino;Sotirios K. Sotiriou;Juha K. Rantala;Simon Magin

  • Intragenic origins due to short G1 phases underlie oncogene-induced DNA replication stress

    Morgane Macheret;Thanos D. Halazonetis

  • Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage

    Jirina Bartkova;Nousin Rezaei;Michalis Liontos;Panagiotis Karakaidos

  • Activation of the DNA damage checkpointandgenomicinstabilityin human precancerous lesions

    Vassilis G. Gorgoulis;Leandros-Vassilios F. Vassiliou;Panagiotis Karakaidos;Panayotis Zacharatos

Frequent Co-Authors

Vassilis G. Gorgoulis
Vassilis G. Gorgoulis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Jirina Bartkova
Jirina Bartkova Karolinska Institute
Dimitris Kletsas
Dimitris Kletsas National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos
Jiri Bartek
Jiri Bartek Karolinska Institute
Jiri Bartek
Jiri Bartek Karolinska Institute
Shelley L. Berger
Shelley L. Berger University of Pennsylvania
Thomas Helleday
Thomas Helleday Karolinska Institute
Jiri Lukas
Jiri Lukas University of Copenhagen
Torben F. Ørntoft
Torben F. Ørntoft Aarhus University
Maxwell Sehested
Maxwell Sehested Rigshospitalet

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology can open doors to advanced healthcare and science careers. For students with a nursing background, online programs offer clear pathways to upskill while balancing professional commitments. For example, adn to np programs online are ideal for associate degree nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners through flexible, accredited courses.

Those considering a career change into healthcare without prior nursing experience can also benefit from direct entry msn programs for non nurses online. These intensive programs help science graduates pivot into advanced nursing roles, making use of their molecular biology training.

Cost is another crucial factor. To maximize return on investment, many students look for the best value nursing education online wgu and similar accredited schools. Comparing institutions can reveal affordable, quality education options with strong outcomes.

Additionally, current registered nurses seeking higher qualifications can consider a bsn to msn online bridge program. These degrees can complement molecular biology expertise for roles in clinical research, healthcare administration, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Thanos D. Halazonetis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles