World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Torben F. Ørntoft

Torben F. Ørntoft

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
60702
World Ranking
3852
National Ranking
43

Torben F. Ørntoft publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torben F. Ørntoft sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 482 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Torben F. Ørntoft D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torben F. Ørntoft sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Torben F. Ørntoft is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their academic profile focuses on work conducted within this institution.

There are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications listed for this scientist. Similarly, there are no specified main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work documented for Torben F. Ørntoft.

There is no recorded information about awards received by this researcher. The profile does not indicate any details about career milestones or specific scientific contributions.

Torben F. Ørntoft is currently living, which keeps their academic and research profile open to future updates and additions.

Best Publications

  • Normalization of Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR Data: A Model-Based Variance Estimation Approach to Identify Genes Suited for Normalization, Applied to Bladder and Colon Cancer Data Sets

    Claus Lindbjerg Andersen;Jens Ledet Jensen;Torben Falck Ørntoft

  • DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis

    Jirina Bartkova;Zuzana Horejsí;Karen Koed;Alwin Krämer

  • Genome-wide association study identifies five new schizophrenia loci

    Stephan Ripke;Alan R. Sanders;Kenneth S. Kendler;Douglas F. Levinson

  • Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage checkpoints

    Jirina Bartkova;Nousin Rezaei;Michalis Liontos;Panagiotis Karakaidos

  • Direct detection of early-stage cancers using circulating tumor DNA

    Jillian Phallen;Mark Sausen;Vilmos Adleff;Alessandro Leal

  • Multiple colorectal adenomas, classic adenomatous polyposis, and germ-line mutations in MYH.

    Oliver M Sieber;Lara Lipton;Michael Crabtree;Karl Heinimann

  • Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci

    Fredrick R. Schumacher;Ali Amin Al Olama;Sonja I. Berndt;Sara Benlloch

  • Identifying distinct classes of bladder carcinoma using microarrays

    Lars Dyrskjøt;Thomas Thykjaer;Mogens Kruhøffer;Jens Ledet Jensen

  • Gene expression in the urinary bladder: a common carcinoma in situ gene expression signature exists disregarding histopathological classification.

    Lars Dyrskjøt;Mogens Kruhøffer;Thomas Thykjaer;Niels Marcussen

  • Diagnostic and Prognostic MicroRNAs in Stage II Colon Cancer

    Troels Schepeler;Jørgen T. Reinert;Marie S. Ostenfeld;Lise L. Christensen

  • Comprehensive Transcriptional Analysis of Early-Stage Urothelial Carcinoma

    Jakob Hedegaard;Philippe Lamy;Iver Nordentoft;Ferran Algaba

  • p53-Responsive MicroRNAs 192 and 215 Are Capable of Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest

    Christian J. Braun;Xin Zhang;Irina Savelyeva;Sonja Wolff

  • Metastasis-Associated Gene Expression Changes Predict Poor Outcomes in Patients with Dukes Stage B and C Colorectal Cancer

    Robert N. Jorissen;Peter Gibbs;Michael Christie;Saurabh Prakash

  • Analysis of circulating tumour DNA to monitor disease burden following colorectal cancer surgery

    Thomas Reinert;Lone V. Schøler;Rune Thomsen;Heidi Tobiasen

  • An Optimized Shotgun Strategy for the Rapid Generation of Comprehensive Human Proteomes.

    Dorte B. Bekker-Jensen;Christian D. Kelstrup;Tanveer S. Batth;Sara C. Larsen

  • Molecular Staging for Survival Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Patients

    Steven Eschrich;Ivana Yang;Greg Bloom;Ka Yin Kwong

  • Gene expression profiling: monitoring transcription and translation products using DNA microarrays and proteomics.

    Julio E Celis;Mogens Kruhøffer;Irina Gromova;Casper Frederiksen

  • Genomic profiling of microRNAs in bladder cancer: miR-129 is associated with poor outcome and promotes cell death in vitro.

    Lars Dyrskjøt;Marie S. Ostenfeld;Jesper B. Bramsen;Asli N. Silahtaroglu

  • Coordinated epigenetic repression of the miR‐200 family and miR‐205 in invasive bladder cancer

    Erik D. Wiklund;Jesper B. Bramsen;Toby Hulf;Lars Dyrskjøt

  • Oncogene-induced senescence is part of the tumorigenesis barrier imposed by DNA damage

    Jirina Bartkova;Nousin Rezaei;Michalis Liontos;Panagiotis Karakaidos

Frequent Co-Authors

Claus L. Andersen
Claus L. Andersen Aarhus University Hospital
Mogens Kruhøffer
Mogens Kruhøffer BioXpedia A/S
Søren Laurberg
Søren Laurberg Aarhus University Hospital
Lauri A. Aaltonen
Lauri A. Aaltonen University of Helsinki
Hans Wolf
Hans Wolf University of Amsterdam
Carsten Wiuf
Carsten Wiuf University of Copenhagen
Jakob Skou Pedersen
Jakob Skou Pedersen Aarhus University
Anders D. Børglum
Anders D. Børglum Aarhus University
Ellen C. Zwarthoff
Ellen C. Zwarthoff Erasmus University Rotterdam
Lisa A. Cannon-Albright
Lisa A. Cannon-Albright University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn't always mean attending medical school. There are several alternative pathways and online degree options for those interested in healthcare careers. These programs offer flexibility, affordability, and a streamlined route into the healthcare workforce.

Aspiring pharmacists can consider online pharmacist programs, which offer in-depth training and prepare candidates for pharmacy licensure. For those interested in managing health data, healthcare informatics degree programs teach essential skills in data analytics and IT.

Students seeking fast entry into healthcare can benefit from a low cost medical coding and billing online program, providing a pathway to administrative and coding roles. If advanced clinical practice is your goal, pursuing one of the cheapest nurse practitioner programs can expand your scope of practice and career opportunities.

Online healthcare degrees are diverse and accessible, making it easier than ever to launch or advance your medical career.

Best Scientists Citing Torben F. Ørntoft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles