World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
8627
World Ranking
7210
National Ranking
3905

Mark S. Salzer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Salzer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark S. Salzer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Salzer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark S. Salzer is affiliated with Temple University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Psychology, with a strong emphasis on General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. They have also contributed to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry, and Mental Health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Family and Disability Support Research, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, and Schizophrenia Research and Treatment.

Salzer has published research in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • Community Mental Health Journal
  • Psychiatric Services
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Among recent publications are the following papers, which represent a selection of their ongoing work:

  • "Mental health symptoms and academic achievement factors," 2021, Journal of American College Health
  • "A Systematic Review of Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Service Users With Serious Mental Illnesses: State of the Science and Future Directions," 2021, Psychiatric Services
  • "Community Participation Comparison Between Adults on the Autism Spectrum and Adults in the General Population," 2021, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • "Self-reported community participation experiences and preferences of autistic adults," 2021, Autism
  • "Getting out of the house: The relationship of venturing into the community and neurocognition among adults with serious mental illness," 2021, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Their frequent collaborators include Eugene Brusilovskiy, Greg Townley, Gretchen Snethen, Bryan P. McCormick, and Wei Song. These coauthors have contributed extensively to Salzer's body of work through repeated collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Examining the Factor Structure of the Recovery Assessment Scale

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Mark Salzer;Ruth O. Ralph;Yvette Sangster

  • Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care.

    Enid M. Hunkeler;Joel F. Meresman;William A. Hargreaves;Bruce Fireman

  • Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness.

    Jeffrey Draine;Mark S. Salzer;Dennis P. Culhane;Trevor R. Hadley

  • Identifying consumer-provider benefits in evaluations of consumer-delivered services.

    Mark S. Salzer;Shoshanna Liptzin Shear

  • A Comparative Study of Campus Experiences of College Students With Mental Illnesses Versus a General College Sample

    Mark S. Salzer

  • Use of Vocational Rehabilitative Services Among Adults with Autism

    Lindsay Lawer;Lindsay Lawer;Eugene Brusilovskiy;Mark S. Salzer;David S. Mandell;David S. Mandell

  • Validating the Empowerment Scale With a Multisite Sample of Consumers of Mental Health Services

    Sc.D. E. Sally Rogers;Ruth O. Ralph;Mark S. Salzer

  • Familiarity With and Use of Accommodations and Supports Among Postsecondary Students With Mental Illnesses

    Mark S. Salzer;B.A. Lindsay C. Wick;A.A. Joseph A. Rogers

  • Accounting for unemployment among people with mental illness.

    Richard C. Baron;Mark S. Salzer

  • Who joins support groups among parents of children with autism

    David S. Mandell;Mark S. Salzer

  • Internet peer support for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: A randomized controlled trial

    Katy Kaplan;Mark S. Salzer;Phyllis Solomon;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • Certified peer specialist roles and activities: results from a national survey.

    Mark S Salzer;Edward Schwenk;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • Clinical outcome, consumer satisfaction, and ad hoc ratings of improvement in children's mental health.

    Warren Lambert;Mark S. Salzer;Leonard Bickman

  • Advancing recovery science: reliability and validity properties of the Recovery Assessment Scale.

    Mark S. Salzer;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

    Mark S. Salzer;Mark S. Salzer;Steven C. Palmer;Katy Kaplan;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: a survival analysis.

    So-Young Min;Jeanie Whitecraft;Aileen B. Rothbard;Mark S. Salzer

  • Consumer empowerment in mental health organizations: concept, benefits, and impediments

    Mark S. Salzer

  • Disclosure of Mental Disability by College and University Faculty: The Negotiation of Accommodations, Supports, and Barriers

    Margaret Price;Mark S. Salzer;Amber O'Shea;Stephanie L. Kerschbaum

  • Research to improve the quality of care for depression: alternatives to the simple randomized clinical trial

    Thomas R. TenHave;James Coyne;Mark Salzer;Ira Katz;Ira Katz

  • From Adherence to Self-Determination: Evolution of a Treatment Paradigm for People With Serious Mental Illnesses

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Beth Angell;Larry Davidson;Steven C. Marcus

  • What information do clinicians value for monitoring adolescent client progress and outcomes

    Leonard Bickman;Julie Rosof-Williams;Mark S. Salzer;Wm. Thomas Summerfelt

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonard Bickman
Leonard Bickman Vanderbilt University
Jeffrey Draine
Jeffrey Draine Temple University
David S. Mandell
David S. Mandell University of Pennsylvania
Patrick W. Corrigan
Patrick W. Corrigan Illinois Institute of Technology
Julian Rappaport
Julian Rappaport University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Phyllis Solomon
Phyllis Solomon University of Pennsylvania
Larry Davidson
Larry Davidson Yale University
Christopher B. Keys
Christopher B. Keys DePaul University
Lisa B. Dixon
Lisa B. Dixon Columbia University
James C. Coyne
James C. Coyne University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying psychology in the USA, it's worth exploring related online degrees and specialized career pathways. A popular and growing field is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), with the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credential being especially sought after. Online programs now make it easier than ever to pursue a career as a BCBA while balancing other commitments.

Each state can have unique requirements for becoming a BCBA. For example, the Arlington bcba education requirements and the Atlanta bcba education requirements highlight the need for accredited graduate coursework, hands-on supervised experience, and passing the BCBA exam.

For those in other regions, becoming a bcba in Aurora or fulfilling the Austin bcba education requirements will involve similar steps, but always check local policies. Online degree programs in psychology or ABA can position you to access a broad range of rewarding career opportunities in education, healthcare, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Salzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles