World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7210 6723 3905 3549 189 8627

Mark S. Salzer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark S. Salzer between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark S. Salzer published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 8 of the 211 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1989 2026

211 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark S. Salzer: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 0
1996 3
1997 7
1998 4
1999 5
2000 4
2001 2
2002 5
2003 5
2004 2
2005 0
2006 4
2007 3
2008 2
2009 4
2010 5
2011 3
2012 8
2013 6
2014 7
2015 4
2016 10
2017 6
2018 5
2019 15
2020 14
2021 27
2022 13
2023 12
2024 13
2025 7
2026 1
Total 211
Download as CSV

Mark S. Salzer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Salzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 189
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark S. Salzer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark S. Salzer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark S. Salzer is affiliated with Temple University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Psychology, with a strong emphasis on General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. They have also contributed to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry, and Mental Health.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, Family and Disability Support Research, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Mental Health Treatment and Access, Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare, and Schizophrenia Research and Treatment.

Salzer has published research in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to the following journals:

  • Community Mental Health Journal
  • Psychiatric Services
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Among recent publications are the following papers, which represent a selection of their ongoing work:

  • "Mental health symptoms and academic achievement factors," 2021, Journal of American College Health
  • "A Systematic Review of Shared Decision-Making Interventions for Service Users With Serious Mental Illnesses: State of the Science and Future Directions," 2021, Psychiatric Services
  • "Community Participation Comparison Between Adults on the Autism Spectrum and Adults in the General Population," 2021, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • "Self-reported community participation experiences and preferences of autistic adults," 2021, Autism
  • "Getting out of the house: The relationship of venturing into the community and neurocognition among adults with serious mental illness," 2021, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Their frequent collaborators include Eugene Brusilovskiy, Greg Townley, Gretchen Snethen, Bryan P. McCormick, and Wei Song. These coauthors have contributed extensively to Salzer's body of work through repeated collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Examining the Factor Structure of the Recovery Assessment Scale

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Mark Salzer;Ruth O. Ralph;Yvette Sangster

  • Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care.

    Enid M. Hunkeler;Joel F. Meresman;William A. Hargreaves;Bruce Fireman

  • Role of social disadvantage in crime, joblessness, and homelessness among persons with serious mental illness.

    Jeffrey Draine;Mark S. Salzer;Dennis P. Culhane;Trevor R. Hadley

  • Identifying consumer-provider benefits in evaluations of consumer-delivered services.

    Mark S. Salzer;Shoshanna Liptzin Shear

  • A Comparative Study of Campus Experiences of College Students With Mental Illnesses Versus a General College Sample

    Mark S. Salzer

  • Use of Vocational Rehabilitative Services Among Adults with Autism

    Lindsay Lawer;Lindsay Lawer;Eugene Brusilovskiy;Mark S. Salzer;David S. Mandell;David S. Mandell

  • Validating the Empowerment Scale With a Multisite Sample of Consumers of Mental Health Services

    Sc.D. E. Sally Rogers;Ruth O. Ralph;Mark S. Salzer

  • Familiarity With and Use of Accommodations and Supports Among Postsecondary Students With Mental Illnesses

    Mark S. Salzer;B.A. Lindsay C. Wick;A.A. Joseph A. Rogers

  • Accounting for unemployment among people with mental illness.

    Richard C. Baron;Mark S. Salzer

  • Who joins support groups among parents of children with autism

    David S. Mandell;Mark S. Salzer

  • Internet peer support for individuals with psychiatric disabilities: A randomized controlled trial

    Katy Kaplan;Mark S. Salzer;Phyllis Solomon;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • Certified peer specialist roles and activities: results from a national survey.

    Mark S Salzer;Edward Schwenk;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • Clinical outcome, consumer satisfaction, and ad hoc ratings of improvement in children's mental health.

    Warren Lambert;Mark S. Salzer;Leonard Bickman

  • Advancing recovery science: reliability and validity properties of the Recovery Assessment Scale.

    Mark S. Salzer;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • A randomized, controlled study of Internet peer-to-peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

    Mark S. Salzer;Mark S. Salzer;Steven C. Palmer;Katy Kaplan;Eugene Brusilovskiy

  • Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: a survival analysis.

    So-Young Min;Jeanie Whitecraft;Aileen B. Rothbard;Mark S. Salzer

  • Consumer empowerment in mental health organizations: concept, benefits, and impediments

    Mark S. Salzer

  • Disclosure of Mental Disability by College and University Faculty: The Negotiation of Accommodations, Supports, and Barriers

    Margaret Price;Mark S. Salzer;Amber O'Shea;Stephanie L. Kerschbaum

  • Research to improve the quality of care for depression: alternatives to the simple randomized clinical trial

    Thomas R. TenHave;James Coyne;Mark Salzer;Ira Katz;Ira Katz

  • From Adherence to Self-Determination: Evolution of a Treatment Paradigm for People With Serious Mental Illnesses

    Patrick W. Corrigan;Beth Angell;Larry Davidson;Steven C. Marcus

  • What information do clinicians value for monitoring adolescent client progress and outcomes

    Leonard Bickman;Julie Rosof-Williams;Mark S. Salzer;Wm. Thomas Summerfelt

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonard Bickman
Leonard Bickman Vanderbilt University
Jeffrey Draine
Jeffrey Draine Temple University
David S. Mandell
David S. Mandell University of Pennsylvania
Patrick W. Corrigan
Patrick W. Corrigan Illinois Institute of Technology
Julian Rappaport
Julian Rappaport University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Phyllis Solomon
Phyllis Solomon University of Pennsylvania
Larry Davidson
Larry Davidson Yale University
Christopher B. Keys
Christopher B. Keys DePaul University
Lisa B. Dixon
Lisa B. Dixon Columbia University
James C. Coyne
James C. Coyne University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying psychology in the USA, it's worth exploring related online degrees and specialized career pathways. A popular and growing field is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), with the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credential being especially sought after. Online programs now make it easier than ever to pursue a career as a BCBA while balancing other commitments.

Each state can have unique requirements for becoming a BCBA. For example, the Arlington bcba education requirements and the Atlanta bcba education requirements highlight the need for accredited graduate coursework, hands-on supervised experience, and passing the BCBA exam.

For those in other regions, becoming a bcba in Aurora or fulfilling the Austin bcba education requirements will involve similar steps, but always check local policies. Online degree programs in psychology or ABA can position you to access a broad range of rewarding career opportunities in education, healthcare, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Mark S. Salzer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles