World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
16370
World Ranking
10101
National Ranking
4419

Joseph M. Beechem publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Beechem sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 295 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Joseph M. Beechem D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph M. Beechem sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph M. Beechem is affiliated with NanoString Technologies in the United States and specializes in Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. The primary focus of their research lies in Molecular Biology, with significant contributions also made in Oncology, Immunology, Cancer Research, and Biophysics.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications, Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications, Immune cells in cancer, and Gene expression and cancer classification.

Joseph M. Beechem has published research in various scientific venues, including:

  • Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia

Frequent collaborators in their research include Jason Reeves, Margaret L. Hoang, Patrick Danaher, Erin Piazza, and Gary Geiss.

Some of the recent scientific papers where Joseph M. Beechem contributed include:

  • Multiplex digital spatial profiling of proteins and RNA in fixed tissue (2020, Nature Biotechnology)
  • COVID-19 tissue atlases reveal SARS-CoV-2 pathology and cellular targets (2021, Nature)
  • High-plex imaging of RNA and proteins at subcellular resolution in fixed tissue by spatial molecular imaging (2022, Nature Biotechnology)
  • Single-nucleus and spatial transcriptome profiling of pancreatic cancer identifies multicellular dynamics associated with neoadjuvant treatment (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • Inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity of metastatic prostate cancer determined by digital spatial gene expression profiling (2021, Nature Communications)

Best Publications

  • Time-resolved fluorescence of proteins.

    Joseph M. Beechem;Ludwig Brand

  • Gene expression markers of Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes

    Patrick Danaher;Sarah Warren;Lucas Dennis;Leonard D’Amico

  • Simultaneous analysis of multiple fluorescence decay curves: A global approach

    Jay R. Knutson;Joseph M. Beechem;Ludwig Brand

  • Multiplex digital spatial profiling of proteins and RNA in fixed tissue.

    Christopher R. Merritt;Giang T. Ong;Sarah E. Church;Kristi Barker

  • COVID-19 tissue atlases reveal SARS-CoV-2 pathology and cellular targets.

    Toni M. Delorey;Carly G. K. Ziegler;Graham Heimberg;Rachelly Normand

  • Quantitative Comparison of Long-wavelength Alexa Fluor Dyes to Cy Dyes: Fluorescence of the Dyes and Their Bioconjugates

    Judith E. Berlier;Anca Rothe;Gayle Buller;Jolene Bradford

  • Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL

    Hays S. Rye;Steven G. Burston;Wayne A. Fenton;Joseph M. Beechem

  • Global quantitative phosphoprotein analysis using Multiplexed Proteomics technology

    Thomas H. Steinberg;Brian J. Agnew;Kyle R. Gee;Wai-Yee Leung

  • Characterization of the Active Intermediate of a GroEL–GroES-Mediated Protein Folding Reaction

    Jonathan S Weissman;Jonathan S Weissman;Hays S Rye;Hays S Rye;Wayne A Fenton;Joseph M Beechem

  • Global analysis of biochemical and biophysical data.

    Joseph M. Beechem

  • The Global Analysis of Fluorescence Intensity and Anisotropy Decay Data: Second-Generation Theory and Programs

    Joseph M. Beechem;Enrico Gratton;Marcel Ameloot;Jay R. Knutson

  • Analysis of steady-state protein phosphorylation in mitochondria using a novel fluorescent phosphosensor dye.

    Birte Schulenberg;Robert Aggeler;Joseph M. Beechem;Roderick A. Capaldi

  • Easily reversible desthiobiotin binding to streptavidin, avidin, and other biotin-binding proteins: uses for protein labeling, detection, and isolation.

    James D Hirsch;Leila Eslamizar;Brian J Filanoski;Nabi Malekzadeh

  • Mechanism of serpin action: evidence that C1 inhibitor functions as a suicide substrate.

    Philip A. Patston;Peter Gettins;Joe Beechem;Marc Schapira

  • Inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity of metastatic prostate cancer determined by digital spatial gene expression profiling.

    Lauren Brady;Michelle Kriner;Ilsa Coleman;Colm Morrissey

  • Quantitative analysis of protein phosphorylation status and protein kinase activity on microarrays using a novel fluorescent phosphorylation sensor dye.

    Karen Martin;Thomas H. Steinberg;Laurie A. Cooley;Kyle R. Gee

  • Cell cycle dependent morphology changes and associated mitochondrial DNA redistribution in mitochondria of human cell lines.

    Daciana H Margineantu;W Gregory Cox;Linda Sundell;Steven W Sherwood

  • Simultaneous determination of intramolecular distance distributions and conformational dynamics by global analysis of energy transfer measurements.

    J.M. Beechem;E. Haas

  • Yeast TATA binding protein interaction with DNA: fluorescence determination of oligomeric state, equilibrium binding, on-rate, and dissociation kinetics.

    Perez-Howard Gm;Weil Pa;Beechem Jm

  • Fluorescence Spectroscopy Data Analysis Environment: A Second Generation Global Analysis Program

    Joseph M. Beechem;Enrico Gratton

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludwig Brand
Ludwig Brand Johns Hopkins University
Gordon B. Mills
Gordon B. Mills Oregon Health & Science University
Deborah T. Hung
Deborah T. Hung Harvard University
Myron F. Goodman
Myron F. Goodman University of Southern California
Aviv Regev
Aviv Regev Genentech
Donald E. Ingber
Donald E. Ingber Harvard University
Gyongyi Szabo
Gyongyi Szabo Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Robert F. Padera
Robert F. Padera Brigham and Women's Hospital
James M. May
James M. May Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Peter G. W. Gettins
Peter G. W. Gettins University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to numerous healthcare and data-driven careers. One rapidly growing field is health information management, where professionals organize and analyze medical data. If you're interested in this career but prefer flexible learning, consider one of the most affordable online health information management degree programs.

Many students also explore careers in medical coding and billing—a field that plays a crucial role in healthcare systems. There are several certifications, each with their own benefits. For a detailed breakdown, read about the differences between cpc vs ccs certifications to help you decide which might be best for you.

Salaries for these roles are competitive and can vary based on experience, education, and credentials. To find out how much do medical coders make, check the latest insights on earning potential in this growing sector.

Wondering about the upsides and challenges of these roles? Discover the real facts and decide if is medical billing and coding worth it for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph M. Beechem

Trending Scientists