World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
5441
World Ranking
8164
National Ranking
687

Tobias Bäumer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Bäumer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 188 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tobias Bäumer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tobias Bäumer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tobias Bäumer is affiliated with the University of Lübeck in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on neurology and its related subfields.

Their work spans multiple specialized areas including:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

The main subfields in which Tobias Bäumer has contributed include:

  • Neurology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Genetics

Tobias Bäumer has published extensively in several venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Movement Disorders
  • Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • Scientific Reports
  • Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Tobias Bäumer include:

  • Increased perception-action binding in Tourette syndrome, 2020, Brain
  • Pandemic Tic-like Behaviors Following Social Media Consumption, 2021, Movement Disorders
  • Dystonia and Tremor, 2020, Neurology
  • The European Reference Network for Rare Neurological Diseases, 2021, Frontiers in Neurology
  • Increased scale-free and aperiodic neural activity during sensorimotor integration-a novel facet in Tourette syndrome, 2021, Brain Communications

Tobias Bäumer often collaborates with several researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Alexander Münchau
  • Christian Beste
  • Anne Weißbach
  • Joel S. Perlmutter
  • Julius Verrel

Best Publications

  • Repeated premotor rTMS leads to cumulative plastic changes of motor cortex excitability in humans.

    Tobias Bäumer;Rüdiger Lange;Joachim Liepert;Cornelius Weiller

  • Magnetic stimulation of human premotor or motor cortex produces interhemispheric facilitation through distinct pathways.

    Tobias Bäumer;Franka Bock;Giacomo Koch;Rüdiger Lange

  • Motor cortex excitability and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

    J Liepert;D Mingers;C Heesen;T Bäumer

  • Structural changes in the somatosensory system correlate with tic severity in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome

    Götz Thomalla;Hartwig R. Siebner;Melanie Jonas;Tobias Bäumer

  • Abnormal excitability of premotor–motor connections in de novo Parkinson's disease

    C Buhmann;A Gorsler;T Bäumer;U Hidding

  • Temporal relationship between premonitory urges and tics in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.

    Valerie C. Brandt;Christian Beck;Valeria Sajin;Magdalena K. Baaske

  • Interhemispheric effects of high and low frequency rTMS in healthy humans

    A Gorsler;T Bäumer;C Weiller;A Münchau

  • The human dorsal premotor cortex facilitates the excitability of ipsilateral primary motor cortex via a short latency cortico-cortical route.

    Sergiu Groppa;Boris H. Schlaak;Alexander Münchau;Nicole Werner-Petroll

  • Inhibitory and facilitatory connectivity from ventral premotor to primary motor cortex in healthy humans at rest--a bifocal TMS study.

    T. Bäumer;S. Schippling;S. Schippling;J. Kroeger;S. Zittel

  • The cortical motor threshold reflects microstructural properties of cerebral white matter.

    Stefan Klöppel;Tobias Bäumer;Johan Kroeger;Martin A. Koch

  • Laterality of interhemispheric inhibition depends on handedness

    T. Bäumer;E. Dammann;F. Bock;S. Klöppel

  • Investigating the human mirror neuron system by means of cortical synchronization during the imitation of biological movements.

    Klaus Kessler;Katja Biermann-Ruben;Melanie Jonas;Melanie Jonas;Hartwig R. Roman Siebner;Hartwig R. Roman Siebner

  • The neural correlates of tic inhibition in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.

    Christos Ganos;Christos Ganos;Christos Ganos;Ursula Kahl;Valerie Brandt;Odette Schunke

  • Action inhibition in Tourette syndrome.

    Christos Ganos;Simone Kühn;Ursula Kahl;Odette Schunke

  • Peripheral nerves and plexus: imaging by MR-neurography and high-resolution ultrasound.

    Mirko Pham;Tobias Bäumer;Martin Bendszus

  • Psychiatric associations of adult-onset focal dystonia phenotypes

    Brian D. Berman;Johanna Junker;Erika Shelton;Stefan H. Sillau

  • Do simple intransitive finger movements consistently activate frontoparietal mirror neuron areas in humans

    M. Jonas;H.R. Siebner;K. Biermann-Ruben;K. Kessler;K. Kessler

  • Impaired induction of long‐term potentiation‐like plasticity in patients with high‐functioning autism and Asperger syndrome

    Nikolai H Jung;Wibke G Janzarik;Igor Delvendahl;Alexander Münchau

  • Costs of control: decreased motor cortex engagement during a Go/NoGo task in Tourette’s syndrome

    Götz Thomalla;Melanie Jonas;Tobias Bäumer;Hartwig R. Siebner

  • 46,XY Gonadal Dysgenesis due to a Homozygous Mutation in Desert Hedgehog (DHH) Identified by Exome Sequencing

    Ralf Werner;Hartmut Merz;Wiebke Birnbaum;Louise Marshall

  • Motor cortex excitability after cerebellar infarction

    J. Liepert;T. Kucinski;O. Tüscher;F. Pawlas

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Münchau
Alexander Münchau University of Lübeck
Hartwig R. Siebner
Hartwig R. Siebner Copenhagen University Hospital
Christine Klein
Christine Klein University of Lübeck
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Christos Ganos
Christos Ganos Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael Orth
Michael Orth University of Ulm
Christian Gerloff
Christian Gerloff University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Götz Thomalla
Götz Thomalla Universität Hamburg
Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl
Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl Hannover Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens doors to many interdisciplinary and applied fields. Students often complement their neuroscience background with related degrees to expand their career options in healthcare, research, therapy, or counseling.

Those interested in behavioral science or mental health might consider enrolling in a bachelors in psychology online. This foundation is ideal for roles in counseling, therapy, or human services. For a clinical social work track, msw online programs offer accessible graduate training focused on social and community-based support.

For students aiming for advanced therapeutic or clinical psychology careers, explore the best psyd programs to gain practical expertise in psychological assessment and intervention. Alternatively, if you are interested in working directly with couples and families, mft programs online focus on marriage and family therapy, often with accelerated online options.

Each of these pathways blends well with a neuroscience background, offering flexible and affordable online study opportunities that support a wide range of career goals in healthcare and the behavioral sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Tobias Bäumer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles