World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
51
Citations
21238
World Ranking
2460
National Ranking
192

Ted R. Hupp publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted R. Hupp sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 206 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Ted R. Hupp D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted R. Hupp sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ted R. Hupp is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, as well as medicine. The scientist's work includes detailed investigations in molecular biology, oncology, immunology, surgery, and infectious diseases.

The main topics of their research output include:

  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Interferon and immune responses
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • RNA Research and Splicing

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Ted R. Hupp comprise:

  • Next-generation probiotics - do they open new therapeutic strategies for cancer patients? (2022), published in Gut Microbes
  • Identification of Subtypes of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Based on DNA Methylation Profiles and Integration of Transcriptome and Genome Data (2020), published in Gastroenterology
  • Highly Conserved Homotrimer Cavity Formed by the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein: A Novel Binding Site (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Mesenchymal stem cells transfer mitochondria to allogeneic Tregs in an HLA-dependent manner improving their immunosuppressive activity (2022), published in Nature Communications
  • Machine learning to predict early recurrence after oesophageal cancer surgery (2020), published in British Journal of Surgery

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Bořivoj Vojtěšek (39 joint publications)
  • J. Robert O'Neill (25 joint publications)
  • Jakub Faktor (22 joint publications)
  • Umesh Kalathiya (21 joint publications)
  • Kathryn L. Ball (21 joint publications)

Ted R. Hupp's work is often published in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) - 8 publications
  • SSRN Electronic Journal - 5 publications
  • Biomolecules - 4 publications
  • Nature Communications - 3 publications
  • iScience - 3 publications

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance

    Maria Secrier;Xiaodun Li;Nadeera de Silva;Matthew D Eldridge

  • The p53 response to ionising radiation in adult and developing murine tissues.

    D E MacCallum;T R Hupp;C A Midgley;D Stuart

  • Posttranslational Modifications of p53 in Replicative Senescence Overlapping but Distinct from Those Induced by DNA Damage

    Katherine Webley;Jane A. Bond;Christopher J. Jones;Jeremy P. Blaydes

  • The Role of TLRs in Anti-cancer Immunity and Tumor Rejection.

    Zuzanna Urban-Wojciuk;Mohd M. Khan;Mohd M. Khan;Benjamin L. Oyler;Robin Fåhraeus

  • Dual-Site Regulation of MDM2 E3-Ubiquitin Ligase Activity

    Maura Wallace;Erin Worrall;Susanne Pettersson;Ted R. Hupp

  • M2 pyruvate kinase provides a mechanism for nutrient sensing and regulation of cell proliferation.

    Hugh P. Morgan;Francis J. O’Reilly;Martin A. Wear;J. Robert O’Neill

  • The landscape of selection in 551 esophageal adenocarcinomas defines genomic biomarkers for the clinic.

    Alexander M. Frankell;SriGanesh Jammula;Xiaodun Li;Gianmarco Contino

  • Mage-A Cancer/Testis Antigens Inhibit p53 Function by Blocking Its Interaction with Chromatin

    Lynnette Marcar;Nicola J. MacLaine;Ted R. Hupp;David W. Meek

  • DAPK-1 binding to a linear peptide motif in MAP1B stimulates autophagy and membrane blebbing

    Ben Harrison;Michaela Kraus;Lindsay Burch;Craig Stevens

  • The regulation of p53 by phosphorylation: a model for how distinct signals integrate into the p53 pathway

    Nicola J Maclaine;Ted R Hupp

  • Emerging roles for the pro-oncogenic anterior gradient-2 in cancer development.

    E Chevet;D Fessart;D Fessart;F Delom;F Delom;A Mulot;A Mulot

  • The pro-metastatic protein anterior gradient-2 predicts poor prognosis in tamoxifen-treated breast cancers.

    R Hrstka;R Nenutil;A Fourtouna;Magdalena Maslon

  • A DIRECT EFFECT OF ACTIVATED HUMAN P53 ON NUCLEAR DNA REPLICATION

    L S Cox;Ted Hupp;C A Midgley;D P Lane

  • Death-associated protein kinase (DAPK) and signal transduction: additional roles beyond cell death.

    Yao Lin;Ted R. Hupp;Craig Stevens

  • Interferon regulatory factor 1 binding to p300 stimulates DNA-dependent acetylation of p53.

    David Dornan;Mirjam Eckert;Maura Wallace;Harumi Shimizu

  • CK1α Plays a Central Role in Mediating MDM2 Control of p53 and E2F-1 Protein Stability

    Anne-Sophie Huart;Nicola J. MacLaine;David W. Meek;Ted R. Hupp

  • Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance (vol 48, pg 1131, 2016)

    Maria Secrier;Xiaodun Li;Nadeera de Silva;Matthew D Eldridge

Frequent Co-Authors

Chandra S. Verma
Chandra S. Verma Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Malcolm D. Walkinshaw
Malcolm D. Walkinshaw University of Edinburgh
Rebecca C. Fitzgerald
Rebecca C. Fitzgerald University of Cambridge
David P. Lane
David P. Lane Karolinska Institute
David R. Goodlett
David R. Goodlett University of Victoria
Simon Tavaré
Simon Tavaré Columbia University
David W. Meek
David W. Meek University of Dundee
Jesper Lagergren
Jesper Lagergren King's College London
Simon P. Langdon
Simon P. Langdon University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens doors to diverse career paths, both within research and in interdisciplinary fields. For students interested in expanding their expertise, pursuing online degrees can be both convenient and affordable. Interdisciplinary programs, such as those highlighted among online interdisciplinary studies degree financial aid options, allow you to blend biology with other areas, increasing career flexibility.

Creative students in Molecular Biology sometimes pivot to design roles, applying their scientific knowledge in the health tech or publishing industries. If this interests you, explore the best online graphic design schools to gain valuable visual communication skills.

A background in Molecular Biology can also lead to roles as scientific historians or archivists. Curious about job prospects in these fields? Discover average salaries for such roles with insights on how much do historians make.

Finally, those interested in data stewardship or academic libraries can consider colleges with library science programs for training in managing scientific resources. Molecular Biology graduates have a broad range of online pathways to boost skills and career options.

Best Scientists Citing Ted R. Hupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles