World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 107 1026 977 621 587 444 40060
Medicine 109 5800 5446 3113 2886 444 42329

Susan G. Hilsenbeck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susan G. Hilsenbeck between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susan G. Hilsenbeck published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 27.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 516 publications in 2023. 116 of the 1,057 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 516. Peak 516 publications in 2023. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 516 publications 2024: 57 publications 2025: 59 publications
1988 2025

1,057 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susan G. Hilsenbeck: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 9
1993 6
1994 7
1995 6
1996 6
1997 8
1998 10
1999 12
2000 6
2001 7
2002 7
2003 5
2004 10
2005 14
2006 19
2007 9
2008 22
2009 17
2010 16
2011 21
2012 19
2013 21
2014 22
2015 31
2016 27
2017 10
2018 10
2019 15
2020 15
2021 19
2022 17
2023 516
2024 57
2025 59
Total 1,057
Download as CSV

Susan G. Hilsenbeck publications per year - data summary

  • Susan G. Hilsenbeck, a Medicine scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, has 1,057 publications recorded across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 516 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1988 and 1990, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 38 years in the span carry no publications at all (1989 and 1991).
  • The rate of publication averages 27.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 29.4 per year counting only the 36 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 668 publications, 63% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 72 publications (5.5 per year); 2001-2013: 187 publications (14.4 per year); 2014-2025: 798 publications (66.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Susan G. Hilsenbeck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan G. Hilsenbeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 444 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 444
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Susan G. Hilsenbeck publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Susan G. Hilsenbeck, a Medicine scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, records 444 publications - the 48th percentile of the discipline.
  • 48% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Susan G. Hilsenbeck, and about 52% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Susan G. Hilsenbeck falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Susan G. Hilsenbeck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susan G. Hilsenbeck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 109
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Susan G. Hilsenbeck D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Susan G. Hilsenbeck, a Medicine scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, records 109 D-Index - the 72nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 72% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Susan G. Hilsenbeck, and about 28% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Susan G. Hilsenbeck ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Susan G. Hilsenbeck is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions in Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Genetics, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's scholarly output includes significant work on cancer biology, especially focused on breast and cervical cancer. Their main topics of study include:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Hilsenbeck include:

  • Mothaffar F. Rimawi
  • Shaun Bulsara
  • Matthew J. Ellis
  • Lacey E. Dobrolecki
  • Bing Zhang

Hilsenbeck's research has been published extensively in several journals, with frequent publication venues as follows:

  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Hilsenbeck include:

  • Comprehensive characterization of 536 patient-derived xenograft models prioritizes candidates for targeted treatment, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Multiomics in primary and metastatic breast tumors from the AURORA US network finds microenvironment and epigenetic drivers of metastasis, 2022, Nature Cancer
  • Neurofibromin Is an Estrogen Receptor-α Transcriptional Co-repressor in Breast Cancer, 2020, Cancer Cell
  • Activation of the IFN Signaling Pathway is Associated with Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Immune Checkpoint Activation in ER-Positive Breast Cancer, 2021, Clinical Cancer Research
  • LOAd703, an oncolytic virus-based immunostimulatory gene therapy, combined with chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer (LOKON001): results from arm 1 of a non-randomised, single-centre, phase 1/2 study, 2024, The Lancet Oncology

The scientist was awarded the distinction of Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Intrinsic Resistance of Tumorigenic Breast Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy

    Xiaoxian Li;Michael T. Lewis;Jian Huang;Carolina Gutierrez

  • Residual breast cancers after conventional therapy display mesenchymal as well as tumor-initiating features

    Chad J. Creighton;Xiaoxian Li;Melissa Landis;J. Michael Dixon

  • Comprehensive Genomic Analysis Identifies Novel Subtypes and Targets of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    Matthew D. Burstein;Anna Tsimelzon;Graham M. Poage;Kyle R. Covington

  • Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer

    Jenny C. Chang;Eric C. Wooten;Anna Tsimelzon;Susan G. Hilsenbeck

  • Role of the Estrogen Receptor Coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer

    C. Kent Osborne;Valerie Bardou;Torsten A. Hopp;Gary C. Chamness

  • Diverse signaling pathways modulate nuclear receptor recruitment of N-CoR and SMRT complexes

    Robert M. Lavinsky;Kristen Jepsen;Thorsten Heinzel;Joseph Torchia

  • BRCAPRO Validation, Sensitivity of Genetic Testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and Prevalence of Other Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes

    Donald A. Berry;Edwin S. Iversen;Daniel F. Gudbjartsson;Elaine H. Hiller

  • Medical Complications and Outcomes After Hip Fracture Repair

    Valerie A. Lawrence;Susan G. Hilsenbeck;Helaine Noveck;Roy M. Poses;Roy M. Poses

  • p53 Is Mutated in a Subset of Advanced-Stage Prostate Cancers

    R Bookstein;D MacGrogan;S G Hilsenbeck;F Sharkey

  • A Renewable Tissue Resource of Phenotypically Stable, Biologically and Ethnically Diverse, Patient-Derived Human Breast Cancer Xenograft Models

    Xiaomei Zhang;Sofie Claerhout;Aleix Prat;Lacey E. Dobrolecki

  • Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with progressive or rapidly recurrent colorectal cancer.

    M. L. Rothenberg;J. R. Eckardt;J. G. Kuhn;H. A. Burris

  • A SUMOylation-dependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis.

    Jessica D. Kessler;Kristopher T. Kahle;Kristopher T. Kahle;Tingting Sun;Kristen L. Meerbrey

  • Comparison of the Effects of a Pure Steroidal antiestrogen With Those of Tamoxifen in a Model of Human Breast Cancer

    Osborne Ck;Coronado-Heinsohn Eb;Hilsenbeck Sg;McCue Bl

  • Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors.

    D. Williams Parsons;Angshumoy Roy;Yaping Yang;Tao Wang

  • Growth of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Relies upon Coordinate Autocrine Expression of the Proinflammatory Cytokines IL-6 and IL-8

    Zachary C. Hartman;Graham M. Poage;Petra den Hollander;Anna Tsimelzon

  • Enhancement of insulin-like growth factor signaling in human breast cancer: estrogen regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 expression in vitro and in vivo.

    A. V. Lee;J. G. Jackson;J. L. Gooch;S. G. Hilsenbeck

  • Incidence and hospital stay for cardiac and pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery.

    Valerie A. Lawrence;Susan G. Hilsenbeck;Cynthia D. Mulrow;Rahul Dhanda

  • Identification of Tumor-initiating Cells in a p53 Null Mouse Model of Breast Cancer

    Mei Zhang;Fariba Behbod;Rachel L. Atkinson;Melissa D. Landis

  • Risk of Pulmonary Complications After Elective Abdominal Surgery

    Valerie A. Lawrence;Rahul Dhanda;Susan G. Hilsenbeck;Carey P. Page

  • Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of weekly CPT-11

    M L Rothenberg;J G Kuhn;H A Burris;J Nelson

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Kent Osborne
C. Kent Osborne Baylor College of Medicine
Rachel Schiff
Rachel Schiff Baylor College of Medicine
Chad J. Creighton
Chad J. Creighton Baylor College of Medicine
Jenny C. Chang
Jenny C. Chang Houston Methodist
Suzanne A. W. Fuqua
Suzanne A. W. Fuqua Baylor College of Medicine
Michael T. Lewis
Michael T. Lewis Baylor College of Medicine
Chad A. Shaw
Chad A. Shaw Baylor College of Medicine
Jeffrey M. Rosen
Jeffrey M. Rosen Baylor College of Medicine
Gordon B. Mills
Gordon B. Mills Oregon Health & Science University
David A. Wheeler
David A. Wheeler Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine can take many forms beyond the traditional MD pathway. Pursuing online nursing programs is a flexible option, especially for those balancing work or family responsibilities. For those seeking a cost-effective route, affordable nursing programs online are increasingly popular, making a nursing degree more accessible than ever.

If you’re already an RN, advancing your education could further your career. Looking for ways to save on tuition? Consider the lower rn to bsn online cost options to efficiently earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing. For aspiring nurse leaders and educators, online nursing phd programs provide the expertise needed to excel in advanced roles.

Not a nurse but interested in entering the field? There are accelerated options like online direct entry msn programs designed for non-nurses, which can help you fast-track your nursing career. These pathways offer diverse opportunities for growth and specialization in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Susan G. Hilsenbeck

Trending Scientists