World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 32 7204 6692 3499 3191 80 8683

Myrtle P. Bell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Myrtle P. Bell between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Myrtle P. Bell published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2009. 3 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2009. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1970 2025

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Myrtle P. Bell: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 3
1999 0
2000 3
2001 0
2002 4
2003 0
2004 4
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 2
2009 9
2010 8
2011 6
2012 5
2013 4
2014 3
2015 0
2016 2
2017 1
2018 3
2019 4
2020 1
2021 4
2022 2
2023 4
2024 1
2025 2
Total 87
Download as CSV

Myrtle P. Bell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myrtle P. Bell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 80 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 80
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Myrtle P. Bell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Myrtle P. Bell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222 32
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Myrtle P. Bell is a researcher affiliated with The University of Texas at Arlington in the United States. Their academic work centers on topics related to social sciences, primarily focusing on areas such as gender diversity and inequality, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, and higher education research studies.

Their recent publications include:

  • "Making Black Lives Matter in academia: A Black feminist call for collective action against anti-blackness in the academy" (2020), published in Gender Work and Organization
  • "Anti-blackness, surface-level diversity continues to matter: what must we do?" (2020), published in Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
  • "Thriving at work with ADHD: antecedents and outcomes of proactive disclosure" (2022), published in Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal
  • "Hold the Torch: Shining a Light on the Lives of Black Management Faculty" (2020), published in Journal of Management
  • ""They Say They Support Diversity Initiatives, But They Don't Demonstrate It": The Impact of DEI Paradigms on the Emotional Labor of HR&DEI Professionals" (2023), published in Journal of Business and Psychology

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Stella M. Nkomo
  • Saija Katila
  • Stephanie Schreven
  • Paulina Segarra
  • Alice Wickström

Myrtle P. Bell's works have been published often in venues such as:

  • Gender Work and Organization (6 publications)
  • Academy of Management Proceedings (4 publications)
  • Equality Diversity and Inclusion An International Journal (3 publications)
  • Journal of Management
  • Journal of Business and Psychology

Their research spans multiple subfields within social sciences, including sociology and political science, gender studies, organizational behavior and human resource management, social psychology, and education.

Main research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Higher Education Research Studies
  • Labor Movements and Unions
  • Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Critical Race Theory in Education

Best Publications

  • Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion

    David A. Harrison;Kenneth H. Price;Myrtle P. Bell

  • Work–Life, Diversity and Intersectionality: A Critical Review and Research Agenda

    Mustafa F. Özbilgin;T. Alexandra Beauregard;Ahu Tatli;Myrtle P. Bell

  • Voice, silence, and diversity in 21st century organizations: Strategies for inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees

    Myrtle P. Bell;Mustafa F. Özbilgin;T. Alexandra Beauregard;Olca Sürgevil

  • Abject Economics The Effects of Battering and Violence on Women’s Work and Employability

    Angela M. Moe;Myrtle P. Bell

  • Discrimination, harassment, and the glass ceiling: Women executives as change agents

    Myrtle P. Bell;Mary E. Mclaughlin;Jennifer M. Sequeira

  • Stigma and Acceptance of Persons With Disabilities: Understudied Aspects of Workforce Diversity

    Mary E. McLaughlin;Myrtle P. Bell;Donna Y. Stringer

  • Strategic human resource management: Employee involvement, diversity, and international issues

    Gary C. McMahan;Myrtle P. Bell;Meghna Virick

  • Gender discrimination and job-related outcomes: a cross-cultural comparison of working women in the United States and China.

    Margaret A. Shaffer;Janice R.W. Joplin;Myrtle P. Bell;Theresa Lau

  • Diversity at a critical juncture : new theories for a complex phenomenon

    Stella M. Nkomo;Myrtle P. Bell;Laura Morgan Roberts;Aparna Joshi

  • Using intra-national diversity for international assignments: A model of bicultural competence and expatriate adjustment

    Myrtle P. Bell;David A. Harrison

  • Generalist and specialist graduate business degrees: Tangible and intangible value

    Yehuda Baruch;Myrtle P. Bell;David Gray

  • Asian American Attitudes toward Affirmative Action in Employment Implications for the Model Minority Myth

    Myrtle P. Bell;David A. Harrison;Mary E. McLaughlin

  • The Case for Mandatory Diversity Education

    Myrtle P. Bell;Mary L. Connerley;Faye K. Cocchiara

  • The tragedy of the uncommons: Reframing workforce diversity

    Karsten Jonsen;Ahu Tatli;Mustafa Ozbilgin;Myrtle Bell

  • ‘Expatriates’: Gender, Race and Class Distinctions in International Management

    Daphne P. Berry;Myrtle P. Bell

  • Assessment and Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Employees: An Applied Guide to Creating Healthy Organizations

    Myrtle P. Bell;James Campbell Quick;Cynthia S. Cycyota

  • The devil without and within: A conceptual model of social cognitive processes whereby discrimination leads stigmatized minorities to become discouraged workers

    Peter A. Heslin;Myrtle P. Bell;Pinar O. Fletcher

  • Immigrants: The new “invisible men and women” in diversity research

    Myrtle P. Bell;Eileen N. Kwesiga;Daphne P. Berry

  • Forming, changing, and acting on attitude toward affirmative action programs in employment : A theory-driven approach

    Myrtle P. Bell;David A. Harrison;Mary E. McLaughlin

  • Work-life, diversity and intersectionality: a critical review and research agenda

    Mustafa F. Özbilgin;T. A. Beauregard;Ahu Tatli;Myrtle P. Bell

  • Presumed Incompetent: The Intersections of Race and Class for Women in Academia

    Myrtle P. Bell

Frequent Co-Authors

Mustafa Özbilgin
Mustafa Özbilgin Brunel University London
David A. Harrison
David A. Harrison The University of Texas at Austin
James Campbell Quick
James Campbell Quick The University of Texas at Arlington
Margaret A. Shaffer
Margaret A. Shaffer University of Oklahoma
Yehuda Baruch
Yehuda Baruch University of Southampton
Stella M. Nkomo
Stella M. Nkomo University of Pretoria
Aparna Joshi
Aparna Joshi Pennsylvania State University
Wendy J. Casper
Wendy J. Casper The University of Texas at Arlington
Derek R. Avery
Derek R. Avery University of Houston
Sherry M. B. Thatcher
Sherry M. B. Thatcher University of Tennessee at Knoxville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and flexible career paths. Many students choose to pursue specialized programs that deliver advanced knowledge and practical skills, all while allowing for the flexibility of online study.

For those planning to become licensed psychologists, psyd programs offer a pathway focused on clinical practice and psychological assessment. If your interests lie in helping couples and families, lmft programs are designed to prepare students for licensure in marriage and family therapy.

Individuals seeking a broader foundation in mental health can consider an online masters in clinical psychology, which opens up roles in counseling, research, and academic settings. For those interested in leadership or administrative roles in education, edd programs provide fast-track pathways to advanced degrees in educational leadership.

These online options allow students to balance career development with personal commitments, offering convenience, affordability, and high academic standards in the fields of social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Myrtle P. Bell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles