World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
12950
World Ranking
4769
National Ranking
2219

Kun Zhang publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kun Zhang sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kun Zhang D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kun Zhang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kun Zhang is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science. Their research spans multiple subfields, notably artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, management science and operations research, signal processing, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist's publications cover a wide range of topics, including Bayesian modeling and causal inference, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, advanced graph neural networks, generative adversarial networks and image synthesis, anomaly detection techniques and applications, blind source separation techniques, and machine learning and data classification.

Kun Zhang has authored research articles published in high-profile venues such as:

  • DeepTrader: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Risk-Return Balanced Portfolio Management with Market Conditions Embedding (2021), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGs (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A Causal View on Robustness of Neural Networks (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • An Online Diagnosis Method for Sensor Intermittent Fault Based on Data-Driven Model (2022), IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
  • Generative-Discriminative Complementary Learning (2020), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Collaborations have been an important aspect of Kun Zhang's research activities. Frequent coauthors include Biwei Huang, Ruichu Cai, Guangyi Chen, Mingming Gong, and Ignavier Ng.

Kun Zhang's research output demonstrates engagement with computational approaches that integrate learning theory, causal inference, and practical applications in intelligent systems and fault diagnosis. The scientist's work contributes to advancing methodologies in areas intersecting machine learning, signal processing, and artificial intelligence.

Best Publications

  • Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge

    Spyridon Bakas;Mauricio Reyes;Andras Jakab;Stefan Bauer

  • Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences

    Jakob Runge;Jakob Runge;Sebastian Bathiany;Erik Bollt;Gustau Camps-Valls

  • Review of Causal Discovery Methods Based on Graphical Models.

    Clark Glymour;Kun Zhang;Peter Spirtes

  • Deep Domain Generalization via Conditional Invariant Adversarial Networks

    Ya Li;Xinmei Tian;Mingming Gong;Yajing Liu

  • Multi-label learning by exploiting label dependency

    Min-Ling Zhang;Kun Zhang

  • Domain Adaptation under Target and Conditional Shift

    Kun Zhang;Bernhard Schlkopf;Krikamol Muandet;Zhikun Wang

  • Kernel-based conditional independence test and application in causal discovery

    Kun Zhang;Jonas Peters;Dominik Janzing;Bernhard Schölkopf

  • On causal and anticausal learning

    Dominik Janzing;Jonas Peters;Eleni Sgouritsa;Kun Zhang

  • Estimation of a Structural Vector Autoregression Model Using Non-Gaussianity

    Aapo Hyvärinen;Kun Zhang;Shohei Shimizu;Patrik O. Hoyer

  • On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model

    Kun Zhang;Aapo Hyvärinen

  • Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances

    Peter Spirtes;Kun Zhang

  • Information-geometric approach to inferring causal directions

    Dominik Janzing;Joris Mooij;Kun Zhang;Jan Lemeire

  • On learning invariant representations for domain adaptation

    Han Zhao;Remi Tachet des Combes;Kun Zhang;Geoffrey J. Gordon;Geoffrey J. Gordon

  • Domain adaptation with conditional transferable components

    Mingming Gong;Kun Zhang;Tongliang Liu;Dacheng Tao

  • Geometry-Consistent Generative Adversarial Networks for One-Sided Unsupervised Domain Mapping

    Huan Fu;Mingming Gong;Chaohui Wang;Kayhan Batmanghelich

  • On Learning Invariant Representation for Domain Adaptation

    Han Zhao;Remi Tachet des Combes;Kun Zhang;Geoffrey J. Gordon

  • On Causal and Anticausal Learning

    Bernhard Schoelkopf;Dominik Janzing;Jonas Peters;Eleni Sgouritsa

  • Inferring deterministic causal relations

    Povilas Daniušis;Dominik Janzing;Joris Mooij;Jakob Zscheischler

  • Multi-source domain adaptation: a causal view

    Kun Zhang;Mingming Gong;Bernhard Scholkopf

  • Approximate Kernel-Based Conditional Independence Tests for Fast Non-Parametric Causal Discovery

    Eric V. Strobl;Kun Zhang;Shyam Visweswaran

  • Kernel-based Conditional Independence Test and Application in Causal Discovery

    Kun Zhang;Jonas Peters;Dominik Janzing;Bernhard Schoelkopf

Frequent Co-Authors

Clark Glymour
Clark Glymour Carnegie Mellon University
Bernhard Schölkopf
Bernhard Schölkopf Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Dacheng Tao
Dacheng Tao Nanyang Technological University
Dominik Janzing
Dominik Janzing Amazon (United States)
Aapo Hyvärinen
Aapo Hyvärinen University of Helsinki
Tongliang Liu
Tongliang Liu University of Sydney
Jakob Zscheischler
Jakob Zscheischler Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Peter Spirtes
Peter Spirtes Carnegie Mellon University
Joris M. Mooij
Joris M. Mooij University of Amsterdam
Jonas Peters
Jonas Peters ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career pathways. In today's digital age, online learning options make it easier to find programs that fit your schedule and career goals. If you're looking to fast-track your education, exploring a fastest computer science degree can help you enter the workforce sooner.

For those interested in interdisciplinary careers, considering related fields can also be an excellent option. Studying for an environmental science degree can open up roles in sustainability, tech-driven environmental solutions, and policy development. Alternatively, the demand for technical expertise is growing in engineering fields such as mechanical and environmental engineering.

Cost is a key consideration for many students. If affordability is a top concern, you may want to look into the cheapest online environmental science degree or pursue an online mechanical engineering degree to find budget-friendly options that still offer excellent education and career prospects. These related online degrees broaden the scope of opportunities available in STEM and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Kun Zhang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles