World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 43 2950 2681 1406 1263 89 12143

Mark Lewandoski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Lewandoski between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Lewandoski published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2007. 4 of the 110 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2007. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 8 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1986 2025

110 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Lewandoski: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 4
1998 4
1999 2
2000 3
2001 1
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 4
2006 5
2007 12
2008 4
2009 6
2010 0
2011 10
2012 2
2013 4
2014 2
2015 4
2016 6
2017 2
2018 3
2019 1
2020 8
2021 1
2022 3
2023 6
2024 1
2025 3
Total 110
Download as CSV

Mark Lewandoski publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lewandoski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 89 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125 89
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Lewandoski D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lewandoski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101 43
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Lewandoski is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and focuses their research on areas intersecting biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including molecular biology, surgery, genetics, gastroenterology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their notable research topics include developmental biology and gene regulation, congenital diaphragmatic hernia studies, genomics and chromatin dynamics, congenital heart defects research, congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies, gastrointestinal motility and disorders, and digestive system and related health.

Mark Lewandoski's recent publications illustrate a focus on embryonic development, gene regulation, and congenital conditions. Selected papers include:

  • Fgf4 maintains Hes7 levels critical for normal somite segmentation clock function, 2020, eLife
  • Proximo-distal positional information encoded by an Fgf-regulated gradient of homeodomain transcription factors in the vertebrate limb, 2020, Science Advances
  • The Fgf8 subfamily (Fgf8, Fgf17 and Fgf18) is required for closure of the embryonic ventral body wall, 2020, Development
  • Cardiac progenitors instruct second heart field fate through Wnts, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Age-associated changes in lineage composition of the enteric nervous system regulate gut health and disease, 2023, eLife

Their frequent coauthors include Matthew J. Anderson, Subhash Kulkarni, Monalee Saha, Jared Slosberg, and Alpana Singh. These collaborations contribute to a diverse and multidisciplinary research network.

Lewandoski's work has been published multiple times in high-profile venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, Differentiation, Science Advances, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Their highest publication counts appear in bioRxiv with 4 publications and eLife and Differentiation with 3 each.

Best Publications

  • Mitochondrial transcription factor A is necessary for mtDNA maintenance and embryogenesis in mice

    Nils-Göran Larsson;Jianming Wang;Hans Wilhelmsson;Anders Oldfors

  • An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination.

    Erik N. Meyers;Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse

    Mark Lewandoski

  • Targeted disruption of Fgf8 causes failure of cell migration in the gastrulating mouse embryo

    Xin Sun;Erik N. Meyers;Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • Fgf8 signalling from the AER is essential for normal limb development.

    Mark Lewandoski;Xin Sun;Gail R. Martin

  • Specification of the anterior hindbrain and establishment of a normal mid/hindbrain organizer is dependent on Gbx2 gene function.

    K. M. Wassarman;M. Lewandoski;K. Campbell;A. L. Joyner

  • Zp3–cre, a transgenic mouse line for the activation or inactivation of loxP-flanked target genes specifically in the female germ line

    Mark Lewandoski;Karen Montzka Wassarman;Gail R. Martin

  • Inactivation of FGF8 in early mesoderm reveals an essential role in kidney development.

    Alan O. Perantoni;Olga Timofeeva;Florence Naillat;Charmaine Richman

  • A beta-catenin gradient links the clock and wavefront systems in mouse embryo segmentation.

    Alexander Aulehla;Winfried Wiegraebe;Valerie Baubet;Matthias B. Wahl

  • Conditional inactivation of Fgf4 reveals complexity of signalling during limb bud development

    Xin Sun;Mark Lewandoski;Erik N. Meyers;Yi-Hsin Liu

  • A Huntington's Disease CAG Expansion at the Murine Hdh Locus Is Unstable and Associated with Behavioural Abnormalities in Mice

    Peggy F. Shelbourne;Nigel Killeen;Robert F. Hevner;Heather M. Johnston

  • Analysis of Fgf8 Gene Function in Vertebrate Development

    M Lewandoski;E N Meyers;G R Martin

  • Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling controls posterior body development by coordinating mesoderm formation and segmentation

    William C. Dunty;Kristin K. Biris;Ravindra B. Chalamalasetty;Makoto M. Taketo

  • FGF signaling acts upstream of the NOTCH and WNT signaling pathways to control segmentation clock oscillations in mouse somitogenesis

    Matthias B. Wahl;Chuxia Deng;Mark Lewandoski;Olivier Pourquié;Olivier Pourquié

  • Cre-mediated chromosome loss in mice.

    Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • FGF4 and FGF8 comprise the wavefront activity that controls somitogenesis

    L. A. Naiche;Nakisha Holder;Mark Lewandoski

  • Fgf8 induces pillar cell fate and regulates cellular patterning in the mammalian cochlea.

    Bonnie E. Jacques;Mireille E. Montcouquiol;Erynn M. Layman;Mark Lewandoski

  • BMP signals control limb bud interdigital programmed cell death by regulating FGF signaling.

    Sangeeta Pajni-Underwood;Catherine P. Wilson;Cindy Elder;Yuji Mishina

  • Mouse primitive streak forms in situ by initiation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition without migration of a cell population

    Margot Williams;Carol Burdsal;Ammasi Periasamy;Mark Lewandoski

  • MUSCLE-SPECIFIC CELL ABLATION CONDITIONAL UPON CRE-MEDIATED DNA RECOMBINATION IN TRANSGENIC MICE LEADS TO MASSIVE SPINAL AND CRANIAL MOTONEURON LOSS

    Uta Grieshammer;Mark Lewandoski;David Prevette;Ronald W. Oppenheim

Frequent Co-Authors

Gail R. Martin
Gail R. Martin University of California, San Francisco
Olivier Pourquié
Olivier Pourquié Brigham and Women's Hospital
Chu-Xia Deng
Chu-Xia Deng University of Macau
Gregg Duester
Gregg Duester Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
David M. Ornitz
David M. Ornitz Washington University in St. Louis
Frank Costantini
Frank Costantini Columbia University
Yingzi Yang
Yingzi Yang Harvard University
Yuji Mishina
Yuji Mishina University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ryoichiro Kageyama
Ryoichiro Kageyama Kyoto University
Brian D. Harfe
Brian D. Harfe University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of dynamic career paths and educational opportunities. Many students are also interested in fields that blend science with social impact, such as social work, counseling, and psychology, which can often be pursued alongside molecular biology coursework.

For students seeking flexible study options, several military friendly online schools offer robust programs in the sciences and related fields, ensuring broad accessibility and support for veterans and active-duty service members.

Complementary graduate pathways are also available. Those with an interest in the human and societal aspects of biology may find value in social work online master's programs or a online masters in psychology. If your interests lie in mental healthcare, consider a masters degree in counseling online to pursue careers in clinical settings.

These related degrees can complement a foundation in molecular biology, providing diverse options for those passionate about health, science, and community impact.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Lewandoski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles