World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
43
Citations
12143
World Ranking
2950
National Ranking
1407

Mark Lewandoski publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lewandoski sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 89 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Mark Lewandoski D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lewandoski sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Lewandoski is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States and focuses their research on areas intersecting biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including molecular biology, surgery, genetics, gastroenterology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their notable research topics include developmental biology and gene regulation, congenital diaphragmatic hernia studies, genomics and chromatin dynamics, congenital heart defects research, congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies, gastrointestinal motility and disorders, and digestive system and related health.

Mark Lewandoski's recent publications illustrate a focus on embryonic development, gene regulation, and congenital conditions. Selected papers include:

  • Fgf4 maintains Hes7 levels critical for normal somite segmentation clock function, 2020, eLife
  • Proximo-distal positional information encoded by an Fgf-regulated gradient of homeodomain transcription factors in the vertebrate limb, 2020, Science Advances
  • The Fgf8 subfamily (Fgf8, Fgf17 and Fgf18) is required for closure of the embryonic ventral body wall, 2020, Development
  • Cardiac progenitors instruct second heart field fate through Wnts, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Age-associated changes in lineage composition of the enteric nervous system regulate gut health and disease, 2023, eLife

Their frequent coauthors include Matthew J. Anderson, Subhash Kulkarni, Monalee Saha, Jared Slosberg, and Alpana Singh. These collaborations contribute to a diverse and multidisciplinary research network.

Lewandoski's work has been published multiple times in high-profile venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), eLife, Differentiation, Science Advances, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Their highest publication counts appear in bioRxiv with 4 publications and eLife and Differentiation with 3 each.

Best Publications

  • Mitochondrial transcription factor A is necessary for mtDNA maintenance and embryogenesis in mice

    Nils-Göran Larsson;Jianming Wang;Hans Wilhelmsson;Anders Oldfors

  • An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination.

    Erik N. Meyers;Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • Conditional control of gene expression in the mouse

    Mark Lewandoski

  • Targeted disruption of Fgf8 causes failure of cell migration in the gastrulating mouse embryo

    Xin Sun;Erik N. Meyers;Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • Fgf8 signalling from the AER is essential for normal limb development.

    Mark Lewandoski;Xin Sun;Gail R. Martin

  • Specification of the anterior hindbrain and establishment of a normal mid/hindbrain organizer is dependent on Gbx2 gene function.

    K. M. Wassarman;M. Lewandoski;K. Campbell;A. L. Joyner

  • Zp3–cre, a transgenic mouse line for the activation or inactivation of loxP-flanked target genes specifically in the female germ line

    Mark Lewandoski;Karen Montzka Wassarman;Gail R. Martin

  • Inactivation of FGF8 in early mesoderm reveals an essential role in kidney development.

    Alan O. Perantoni;Olga Timofeeva;Florence Naillat;Charmaine Richman

  • A beta-catenin gradient links the clock and wavefront systems in mouse embryo segmentation.

    Alexander Aulehla;Winfried Wiegraebe;Valerie Baubet;Matthias B. Wahl

  • Conditional inactivation of Fgf4 reveals complexity of signalling during limb bud development

    Xin Sun;Mark Lewandoski;Erik N. Meyers;Yi-Hsin Liu

  • A Huntington's Disease CAG Expansion at the Murine Hdh Locus Is Unstable and Associated with Behavioural Abnormalities in Mice

    Peggy F. Shelbourne;Nigel Killeen;Robert F. Hevner;Heather M. Johnston

  • Analysis of Fgf8 Gene Function in Vertebrate Development

    M Lewandoski;E N Meyers;G R Martin

  • Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling controls posterior body development by coordinating mesoderm formation and segmentation

    William C. Dunty;Kristin K. Biris;Ravindra B. Chalamalasetty;Makoto M. Taketo

  • FGF signaling acts upstream of the NOTCH and WNT signaling pathways to control segmentation clock oscillations in mouse somitogenesis

    Matthias B. Wahl;Chuxia Deng;Mark Lewandoski;Olivier Pourquié;Olivier Pourquié

  • Cre-mediated chromosome loss in mice.

    Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • FGF4 and FGF8 comprise the wavefront activity that controls somitogenesis

    L. A. Naiche;Nakisha Holder;Mark Lewandoski

  • Fgf8 induces pillar cell fate and regulates cellular patterning in the mammalian cochlea.

    Bonnie E. Jacques;Mireille E. Montcouquiol;Erynn M. Layman;Mark Lewandoski

  • BMP signals control limb bud interdigital programmed cell death by regulating FGF signaling.

    Sangeeta Pajni-Underwood;Catherine P. Wilson;Cindy Elder;Yuji Mishina

  • Mouse primitive streak forms in situ by initiation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition without migration of a cell population

    Margot Williams;Carol Burdsal;Ammasi Periasamy;Mark Lewandoski

  • MUSCLE-SPECIFIC CELL ABLATION CONDITIONAL UPON CRE-MEDIATED DNA RECOMBINATION IN TRANSGENIC MICE LEADS TO MASSIVE SPINAL AND CRANIAL MOTONEURON LOSS

    Uta Grieshammer;Mark Lewandoski;David Prevette;Ronald W. Oppenheim

Frequent Co-Authors

Gail R. Martin
Gail R. Martin University of California, San Francisco
Olivier Pourquié
Olivier Pourquié Brigham and Women's Hospital
Chu-Xia Deng
Chu-Xia Deng University of Macau
Gregg Duester
Gregg Duester Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
David M. Ornitz
David M. Ornitz Washington University in St. Louis
Frank Costantini
Frank Costantini Columbia University
Yingzi Yang
Yingzi Yang Harvard University
Yuji Mishina
Yuji Mishina University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ryoichiro Kageyama
Ryoichiro Kageyama Kyoto University
Brian D. Harfe
Brian D. Harfe University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of dynamic career paths and educational opportunities. Many students are also interested in fields that blend science with social impact, such as social work, counseling, and psychology, which can often be pursued alongside molecular biology coursework.

For students seeking flexible study options, several military friendly online schools offer robust programs in the sciences and related fields, ensuring broad accessibility and support for veterans and active-duty service members.

Complementary graduate pathways are also available. Those with an interest in the human and societal aspects of biology may find value in social work online master's programs or a online masters in psychology. If your interests lie in mental healthcare, consider a masters degree in counseling online to pursue careers in clinical settings.

These related degrees can complement a foundation in molecular biology, providing diverse options for those passionate about health, science, and community impact.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Lewandoski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles