World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
88
Citations
42629
World Ranking
772
National Ranking
408

Frank Costantini publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Costantini sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 165 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Frank Costantini D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Costantini sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Costantini is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research spans several subfields, including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Urology. Their work mainly focuses on topics related to Renal and related cancers, Birth, Development, and Health, Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies, Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases, and Urological Disorders and Treatments.

Among their recent scholarly contributions are the following papers:

  • Low nephron endowment increases susceptibility to renal stress and chronic kidney disease, 2023, published in JCI Insight
  • Ret signaling in ureteric bud epithelial cells controls cell movements, cell clustering and bud formation, 2021, published in Development

Frequent co-authors of Frank Costantini include:

  • Pamela I. Good
  • Ling Li
  • Holly A. Hurst
  • Ileana Serrano Herrera
  • Katherine Xu

The scientist's research has appeared in publication venues such as JCI Insight and Development, each featuring at least one publication.

Best Publications

  • Manipulating the mouse embryo: A laboratory manual

    Brigid Hogan;Frank Costantini;Elizabeth Lacy

  • Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus

    Shankar Srinivas;Tomoko Watanabe;Chyuan-Sheng Lin;Chris M William

  • Wnt/β-Catenin/Tcf Signaling Induces the Transcription of Axin2, a Negative Regulator of the Signaling Pathway

    Eek-hoon Jho;Tong Zhang;Claire Domon;Choun-Ki Joo

  • Defects in the kidney and enteric nervous system of mice lacking the tyrosine kinase receptor Ret

    Anita Schuchardt;Vivette D'Agati;Lena Larsson-Blomberg;Frank Costantini

  • Erythroid differentiation in chimaeric mice blocked by a targeted mutation in the gene for transcription factor GATA-1

    Larysa Pevny;M. Celeste Simon;Elizabeth Robertson;William H. Klein

  • The Mouse Fused Locus Encodes Axin, an Inhibitor of the Wnt Signaling Pathway That Regulates Embryonic Axis Formation

    Li Zeng;François Fagotto;Tong Zhang;Wei Hsu

  • Manipulating the Mouse Embryo

    Brigid Hogan;Rosa Beddington;Frank Costantini;Gen Me

  • Expression of the c-ret proto-oncogene during mouse embryogenesis

    Vassilis Pachnis;Baljinder Mankoo;Frank Costantini

  • GDNF signalling through the Ret receptor tyrosine kinase

    Pascale Durbec;Camelia V. Marcos-Gutierrez;Carol Kilkenny;Maria Grigoriou

  • Interleukin-6 deficient mice are protected from bone loss caused by estrogen depletion.

    Valeria Poli;Raffaella Balena;Elena Fattori;Angelo Markatos

  • Patterning a complex organ: branching morphogenesis and nephron segmentation in kidney development.

    Frank Costantini;Raphael Kopan

  • Differential effects of an erythropoietin receptor gene disruption on primitive and definitive erythropoiesis.

    Chyuan-Sheng Lin;Sai-Kiang Lim;V. D'agati;F. Costantini

  • Lymphoproliferative disorder and imbalanced T-helper response in C/EBP beta-deficient mice.

    I Screpanti;L Romani;P Musiani;A Modesti

  • Common origin and developmental dependence on c-ret of subsets of enteric and sympathetic neuroblasts.

    Pascale L. Durbec;Lena B. Larsson-Blomberg;Anita Schuchardt;Frank Costantini

  • Transgenic mice expressing a human poliovirus receptor: a new model for poliomyelitis.

    Ruibao Ren;Frank Costantini;Edward J. Gorgacz;James J. Lee

  • Erythropoietin receptor signalling is required for normal brain development

    Xiaobing Yu;John J. Shacka;Jeffrey B. Eells;Carlos Suarez-Quian

  • Development of hematopoietic cells lacking transcription factor GATA-1

    L. Pevny;Chyuan-Sheng Lin;V. D'agati;M. C. Simon

  • Developmental regulation of human fetal-to-adult globin gene switching in transgenic mice

    Tariq Enver;Natacha Raich;Allen J. Ebens;Thalia Papayannopoulou

  • Conditional and inducible transgene expression in mice through the combinatorial use of Cre-mediated recombination and tetracycline induction

    Gusztav Belteki;Jody Haigh;Jody Haigh;Nikolett Kabacs;Katharina Haigh;Katharina Haigh

  • Patterning a Complex Organ: BranchingMorphogenesisandNephronSegmentation in Kidney Development

    Frank Costantini;Raphael Kopan

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivette D. D'Agati
Vivette D. D'Agati Columbia University
Vassilis Pachnis
Vassilis Pachnis The Francis Crick Institute
Naoya Asai
Naoya Asai Nagoya University
Glenn L. Radice
Glenn L. Radice Brown University
Jonathan D. Licht
Jonathan D. Licht University of Florida
Ronald L. Nagel
Ronald L. Nagel Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Masahide Takahashi
Masahide Takahashi Nagoya University
Stuart H. Orkin
Stuart H. Orkin Harvard University
Cathy Mendelsohn
Cathy Mendelsohn Columbia University
Gail R. Martin
Gail R. Martin University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Molecular Biology opens doors to many advanced education pathways. For those interested in healthcare or molecular research, there are flexible online degree options tailored to various academic backgrounds. For registered nurses looking to take the next step, adn to np programs online provide a streamlined route to becoming a nurse practitioner—an ideal complement to research-centric training in molecular biology.

Non-nurses or career changers can leap directly into advanced practice roles using direct entry msn programs online. These programs equip students with both clinical expertise and the analytical skills gained in molecular biology studies.

Selecting the right online school is crucial. When comparing options like SNHU and WGU, it’s wise to research platforms that evaluate which school is better snhu vs wgu for your chosen pathway. Affordability and flexibility matter, especially if you’re considering programs such as online bsn to msn programs.

Combining a background in molecular biology with a graduate healthcare degree can lead to diverse career opportunities in research, education, and clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Costantini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles