World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
93
Citations
55441
World Ranking
2056
National Ranking
1121

Gail R. Martin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail R. Martin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 169 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Gail R. Martin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gail R. Martin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Gail R. Martin is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their scientific contributions are documented in publications in journals such as G3 Genes Genomes Genetics. A notable recent paper is titled "The UCSF Mouse Inventory Database Application, an Open Source Web App for Sharing Mutant Mice Within a Research Community" published in 2020 in G3 Genes Genomes Genetics.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Their work also concentrates on specific subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology

Their research topics cover various themes, including:

  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
  • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Frequent co-authors associated with this scientist include:

  • Estelle A. Wall
  • Jonathan Scoles
  • Adriane Joo
  • Ophir D. Klein
  • Carlo Quiñonez

Throughout their career, Gail R. Martin has been recognized by scientific institutions, receiving honors such as being named a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 2002.

Best Publications

  • Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells

    Gail R. Martin

  • Rapid production of full-length cDNAs from rare transcripts: amplification using a single gene-specific oligonucleotide primer

    Michael A. Frohman;Michael K. Dush;Gail R. Martin

  • MicroRNA-21 contributes to myocardial disease by stimulating MAP kinase signalling in fibroblasts

    Thomas Thum;Carina Gross;Jan Fiedler;Thomas Fischer

  • The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo

    P.H. Crossley;G.R. Martin

  • An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination.

    Erik N. Meyers;Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • Teratocarcinomas and mammalian embryogenesis

    Gail R. Martin

  • A positive feedback loop coordinates growth and patterning in the vertebrate limb

    Lee Niswander;Susan Jeffrey;Gail R. Martin;Cheryll Tickle

  • Fgf-4 expression during gastrulation, myogenesis, limb and tooth development in the mouse

    L. Niswander;G.R. Martin

  • Differentiation of clonal lines of teratocarcinoma cells: formation of embryoid bodies in vitro.

    Gail R. Martin;Martin J. Evans

  • The roles of FGFs in the early development of vertebrate limbs

    Gail R. Martin

  • FGF-4 replaces the apical ectodermal ridge and directs outgrowth and patterning of the limb

    Lee Niswander;Cheryll Tickle;Astrid Vogel;Iain Booth

  • Signals for death and survival: A two-step mechanism for cavitation in the vertebrate embryo

    Electra Coucouvanis;Gail R. Martin

  • Midbrain development induced by FGF8 in the chick embryo

    Philip H. Crossley;Salvador Martinez;Gail R. Martin

  • Roles for FGF8 in the Induction, Initiation, and Maintenance of Chick Limb Development

    Philip H Crossley;George Minowada;Craig A MacArthur;Gail R Martin

  • The branching programme of mouse lung development

    Ross J. Metzger;Ophir D. Klein;Gail R. Martin;Mark A. Krasnow

  • Spatially restricted expression of Dlx-1, Dlx-2 (Tes-1), Gbx-2, and Wnt- 3 in the embryonic day 12.5 mouse forebrain defines potential transverse and longitudinal segmental boundaries

    A. Bulfone;L. Puelles;M. H. Porteus;M. A. Frohman

  • FGF5 as a regulator of the hair growth cycle: evidence from targeted and spontaneous mutations.

    Jean M. Hébert;Thomas Rosenquist;Jürgen Götz;Gail R. Martin

  • Functions of FGF signalling from the apical ectodermal ridge in limb development

    Xin Sun;Francesca V. Mariani;Gail R. Martin

  • Targeted disruption of Fgf8 causes failure of cell migration in the gastrulating mouse embryo

    Xin Sun;Erik N. Meyers;Mark Lewandoski;Gail R. Martin

  • VERTEBRATE SPROUTY GENES ARE INDUCED BY FGF SIGNALING AND CAN CAUSE CHONDRODYSPLASIA WHEN OVEREXPRESSED

    George Minowada;Lesley A. Jarvis;Candace L. Chi;Annette Neubüser

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Lewandoski
Mark Lewandoski National Institutes of Health
Michael A. Frohman
Michael A. Frohman Stony Brook University
Lee M. Silver
Lee M. Silver Princeton University
Lee Niswander
Lee Niswander University of Colorado Boulder
Ophir D. Klein
Ophir D. Klein University of California, San Francisco
Salvador Martinez
Salvador Martinez Miguel Hernandez University
John L.R. Rubenstein
John L.R. Rubenstein University of California, San Francisco
Howard S. Fox
Howard S. Fox University of Nebraska Medical Center
Steven D. Rosen
Steven D. Rosen University of California, San Francisco
Frank Costantini
Frank Costantini Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gail R. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles