World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 102 7754 4040 213 31900

John M. Dietschy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John M. Dietschy between 1964 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John M. Dietschy published across 49 years, from 1964 to 2012, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1983. 3 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1983. 1964: 3 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 6 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 4 publications 1969: 5 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 9 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 4 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 5 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 10 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication
1964 2012

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John M. Dietschy: publications per year, 1964 to 2012
Year Publications
1964 3
1965 1
1966 6
1967 1
1968 4
1969 5
1970 4
1971 6
1972 5
1973 3
1974 9
1975 4
1976 4
1977 5
1978 5
1979 5
1980 5
1981 6
1982 3
1983 10
1984 6
1985 7
1986 7
1987 4
1988 4
1989 4
1990 1
1991 1
1992 3
1993 4
1994 5
1995 8
1996 3
1997 5
1998 5
1999 3
2000 6
2001 4
2002 4
2003 5
2004 4
2005 5
2006 1
2007 3
2008 4
2009 6
2010 5
2011 2
2012 1
Total 214
Download as CSV

John M. Dietschy publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Dietschy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 213 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363 213
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John M. Dietschy D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Dietschy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 102
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John M. Dietschy was affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States during their academic career. Their work focused on research within the biomedical sciences, contributing to the broader understanding of the fields represented at this institution.

Throughout their career, John M. Dietschy published several research papers. However, there are no specific recent publications or detailed information available regarding titles, publication venues, or citation counts for these works that can be listed.

Information about frequent co-authors or regular collaborators is not documented, which suggests either a diverse range of co-authorships or unavailable records for this aspect of their academic network.

Similarly, no particular frequent publication venues or journals have been noted, leaving the exact outlets for their research undisclosed in the available data.

No records were found regarding book publications authored or contributed to by John M. Dietschy, nor are there details about specific publishers connected to their work.

Details on the main fields and subfields of study or the central topics covered throughout their research career were not provided. As a result, information on their academic specialization remains unspecified.

There are no awards or honors listed in relation to John M. Dietschy. Consequently, there is no publicly available recognition data to outline.

Best Publications

  • Regulation of Absorption and ABC1-Mediated Efflux of Cholesterol by RXR Heterodimers

    Joyce Repa;Stephen D Turley;J. M A Lobaccaro;J. Medina

  • Thematic review series: brain Lipids. Cholesterol metabolism in the central nervous system during early development and in the mature animal.

    John M. Dietschy;Stephen D. Turley

  • Cholesterol metabolism in the brain

    John M. Dietschy;Stephen D. Turley

  • Role of liver in the maintenance of cholesterol and low density lipoprotein homeostasis in different animal species, including humans.

    J M Dietschy;S D Turley;D K Spady

  • Relative importance of high and low density lipoproteins in the regulation of cholesterol synthesis in the adrenal gland, ovary, and testis of the rat.

    John M Andersen;J. M. Dietschy

  • Knockout of the Cholesterol 24-Hydroxylase Gene in Mice Reveals a Brain-specific Mechanism of Cholesterol Turnover

    Erik G. Lund;Chonglun Xie;Tiina Kotti;Stephen D. Turley

  • Reversal of defective lysosomal transport in NPC disease ameliorates liver dysfunction and neurodegeneration in the npc1−/− mouse

    Benny Liu;Stephen D. Turley;Dennis K. Burns;Anna M. Miller

  • Regulation of Cholesterol Metabolism

    John M. Dietschy;Jean D. Wilson

  • Active and inactive forms of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in the liver of the rat. Comparison with the rate of cholesterol synthesis in different physiological states.

    Michael S Brown;Joseph L Goldstein;J. M. Dietschy

  • Dietary saturated triacylglycerols suppress hepatic low density lipoprotein receptor activity in the hamster.

    David K. Spady;John M. Dietschy

  • Mechanisms for the intestinal absorption of bile acids.

    John M. Dietschy

  • Effect of cholesterol feeding and fasting on sterol synthesis in seventeen tissues of the rat.

    John M. Dietschy;Marvin D. Siperstein

  • Characterization of the kinetics of the passive and active transport mechanisms for bile acid absorption in the small intestine and colon of the rat

    Eugene R. Schiff;Neal C. Small;John M. Dietschy

  • Regulation of plasma LDL-cholesterol levels by dietary cholesterol and fatty acids

    D. K. Spady;L. A. Woollett;J. M. Dietschy

  • Control of cholesterol turnover in the mouse.

    John M. Dietschy;Stephen D. Turley

  • Delineation of the Dimensions and Permeability Characteristics of the Two Major Diffusion Barriers to Passive Mucosal Uptake in the Rabbit Intestine

    Henrik Westergaard;John M. Dietschy

  • Marked reduction in bile acid synthesis in cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase-deficient mice does not lead to diminished tissue cholesterol turnover or to hypercholesterolemia

    Margrit Schwarz;David W. Russell;John M. Dietschy;Stephen D. Turley

  • 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase SOLUBILIZATION AND PURIFICATION OF A COLD-SENSITIVE MICROSOMAL ENZYME

    Michael S. Brown;Suzanna E. Dana;John M. Dietschy;Marvin D. Siperstein

  • Regulation of rates of cholesterol synthesis in vivo in the liver and carcass of the rat measured using [3H]water.

    Debra J. Jeske;John M. Dietschy

  • The intestinal unstirred layer: its surface area and effect on active transport kinetics.

    Frederick A. Wilson;John M. Dietschy

Frequent Co-Authors

Joyce J. Repa
Joyce J. Repa The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
David W. Russell
David W. Russell University of Washington
James A. Richardson
James A. Richardson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jay D. Horton
Jay D. Horton The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Michael S. Brown
Michael S. Brown The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Robert S. Munford
Robert S. Munford The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jean D. Wilson
Jean D. Wilson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Joachim Herz
Joachim Herz The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Joseph L. Goldstein
Joseph L. Goldstein The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Sherwood L. Gorbach
Sherwood L. Gorbach Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career goes beyond becoming a physician. Many rewarding opportunities are available through online degrees, especially for those seeking flexibility and affordability. Whether you are considering supporting roles or advanced clinical practice, there is a pathway that matches your goals and budget.

If you're interested in healthcare administration or coding, it's worth exploring how much does it cost to become a medical coder. This growing field offers quick entry into the healthcare industry without the lengthy commitment of medical school.

Nursing remains a highly valued profession, and many students explore affordable options to earn a nursing degree online. For those aiming for more advanced practice, there are affordable np programs available to help you take the next step as a nurse practitioner.

Finally, nurses seeking leadership or academic careers can find online phd in nursing programs designed for working professionals. With so many online options, a healthcare career is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Dietschy

Recently Published Articles