World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 71 1373 1225 696 607 173 19547

John D. Gearhart publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John D. Gearhart between 1970 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John D. Gearhart published across 48 years, from 1970 to 2017, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1998. 3 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1998. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 2 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication
1970 2017

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John D. Gearhart: publications per year, 1970 to 2017
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 1
1972 2
1973 2
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 3
1981 4
1982 1
1983 1
1984 1
1985 2
1986 6
1987 7
1988 7
1989 6
1990 4
1991 6
1992 1
1993 4
1994 4
1995 4
1996 5
1997 6
1998 10
1999 4
2000 4
2001 6
2002 6
2003 5
2004 4
2005 8
2006 5
2007 3
2008 10
2009 7
2010 10
2011 7
2012 1
2013 5
2014 4
2015 4
2016 2
2017 1
Total 189
Download as CSV

John D. Gearhart publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Gearhart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 167–176 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 173 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131 173
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

John D. Gearhart D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Gearhart sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106 71
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

John D. Gearhart is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their academic profile does not list recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues, which suggests either a limited recent publication record or data unavailability at this time.

No specific fields or subfields of study have been documented in the available source data, and there are no main topics of work identified. Additionally, there is no record of book publications or awards linked to their academic career.

Given the lack of detailed publication or research topics, the profile reflects a minimal public academic footprint based on the provided information. The data indicates an active status, as there is no indication that John D. Gearhart is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Cellular and developmental control of O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α

    Narayan V. Iyer;Lori E. Kotch;Faton Agani;Sandra W. Leung

  • DERIVATION OF PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS FROM CULTURED HUMAN PRIMORDIAL GERM CELLS

    Michael J. Shamblott;Joyce Axelman;Shunping Wang;Elizabeth M. Bugg

  • Targeted disruption of the mouse factor VIII gene produces a model of haemophilia A

    L. Bi;A. M. Lawler;Stylianos Antonarakis;K. A. High

  • The end of the beginning for pluripotent stem cells

    Peter J. Donovan;John Gearhart

  • Human embryonic germ cell derivatives express a broad range of developmentally distinct markers and proliferate extensively in vitro

    Michael J. Shamblott;Joyce Axelman;John W. Littlefield;Paul D. Blumenthal

  • A locus control region adjacent to the human red and green visual pigment genes

    Yanshu Wang;Jennifer P. Macke;Shannath L. Merbs;Donald J. Zack

  • Introduction and expression of the 400 kilobase precursor amyloid protein gene in transgenic mice

    Bruce T. Lamb;Sangram S. Sisodia;Ann M. Lawler;Hilda H. Slunt

  • Human embryonic germ cell derivatives facilitate motor recovery of rats with diffuse motor neuron injury.

    Douglas A. Kerr;Jerònia Lladó;Michael J. Shamblott;Nicholas J. Maragakis

  • The neurobiologic consequences of Down syndrome.

    J.T. Coyle;M.L. Oster-Granite;J.D. Gearhart

  • New Potential for Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    John Gearhart

  • Cell-type-specific and hypoxia-inducible expression of the human erythropoietin gene in transgenic mice.

    Gregg L. Semenza;Stephen T. Koury;Mary K. Nejfelt;John D. Gearhart

  • Human embryonic pluripotent germ cells

    John D. Gearhart;Michael Joseph Shamblott

  • Unusual topography of bovine rhodopsin promoter-IacZ fusion gene expression in transgenic mouse retinas

    Donald J. Zack;Jean Bennett;Yanshu Wang;Carol Davenport;Carol Davenport

  • Astrocytosis and axonal proliferation in the hippocampus of S100b transgenic mice.

    Roger H. Reeves;Jibin Yao;Michael R. Crowley;Michael R. Crowley;Suzanne Buck

  • Optimization of direct fibroblast reprogramming to cardiomyocytes using calcium activity as a functional measure of success.

    Russell C. Addis;Jamie L. Ifkovits;Filipa Pinto;Lori D. Kellam

  • Functional antigen-presenting leucocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in vitro

    Xiangcan Zhan;Gautam Dravid;Zhaohui Ye;Holly Hammond

  • Inhibition of TGFβ signaling increases direct conversion of fibroblasts to induced cardiomyocytes.

    Jamie L. Ifkovits;Russell C. Addis;Jonathan A. Epstein;John D. Gearhart

  • Expression of NF-L in both neuronal and nonneuronal cells of transgenic mice: increased neurofilament density in axons without affecting caliber.

    Mervyn J. Monteiro;Paul N. Hoffman;John D. Gearhart;Don W. Cleveland

  • Human enbryonic germ cell line and methods of use

    Gearhart John D;Shamblott Michael Joseph

  • Human Embryonic Stem Cells

    Ian Wilmut;Michael D. West;Robert P. Lanza;John D. Gearhart

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger H. Reeves
Roger H. Reeves Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Joseph T. Coyle
Joseph T. Coyle Harvard University
Bruce T. Lamb
Bruce T. Lamb Indiana University
Peter J. Donovan
Peter J. Donovan University of California, Irvine
Ruth R. Faden
Ruth R. Faden Johns Hopkins University
Bruce F. O'Hara
Bruce F. O'Hara University of Kentucky
Sangram S. Sisodia
Sangram S. Sisodia University of Chicago
Guy M. McKhann
Guy M. McKhann Johns Hopkins University
Jacobus F.A. Jansen
Jacobus F.A. Jansen Maastricht University
Stylianos E. Antonarakis
Stylianos E. Antonarakis University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students inspired by a background in molecular biology, there are diverse online education and career advancement options in healthcare and life sciences. Many professionals begin their journey in nursing and consider accelerating their credentials. For example, the 6 month rn to bsn program is designed for quick career progression, providing flexibility for working nurses.

Those interested in advancing further can explore specialized pathways like rn to np bridge programs, which enable registered nurses to become nurse practitioners in less time. Additionally, individuals from non-nursing backgrounds—such as molecular biology graduates—can consider the online direct entry msn route to rapidly enter the field of nursing leadership or education.

Selecting a school is another important decision. Comparing institutions like Capella, Chamberlain, and WGU is valuable, as each offers different strengths and program structures. To help make an informed choice, see this detailed comparison: capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Gearhart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles