World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
12070
World Ranking
4171
National Ranking
360

Leo Peichl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Peichl sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 124 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Leo Peichl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo Peichl sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leo Peichl is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience, particularly focusing on retinal development and disorders.

Their work spans several interconnected fields of study, including:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Subfields prominently represented in their research include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems
  • Plant Science
  • Global and Planetary Change

Key topics addressed in their publications reveal a focus on:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Light effects on plants
  • Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Leo Peichl include:

  • "Eye-Transcriptome and Genome-Wide Sequencing for Scolecophidia: Implications for Inferring the Visual System of the Ancestral Snake," 2021, Genome Biology and Evolution
  • "Author Correction: Cryptochrome 1 in Retinal Cone Photoreceptors Suggests a Novel Functional Role in Mammals," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "No evidence for age-related alterations in the marmoset retina," 2022, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
  • "On the retinae of Glis and Graphiurus: photoreceptor and ganglion cell populations, an absence of shortwave-sensitive cones, and some other features (Rodentia: Gliridae)," 2023, Lynx new series
  • "Full-length Cryptochrome 1 in the outer segments of the retinal blue cone photoreceptors in humans and great apes suggests a role beyond transcriptional repression," 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Leo Peichl include:

  • Sonja Meimann
  • Christine Nießner
  • Michael Winklhofer
  • Silke Haverkamp
  • Katja Reinhard

The venues in which their work most often appears are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Genome Biology and Evolution
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
  • Lynx new series

Best Publications

  • Nuclear Architecture of Rod Photoreceptor Cells Adapts to Vision in Mammalian Evolution

    Irina Solovei;Moritz Kreysing;Christian Lanctôt;Süleyman Kösem

  • LBR and Lamin A/C Sequentially Tether Peripheral Heterochromatin and Inversely Regulate Differentiation

    Irina Solovei;Audrey S. Wang;Katharina Thanisch;Christine S. Schmidt

  • Diversity of mammalian photoreceptor properties: adaptations to habitat and lifestyle?

    Leo Peichl

  • Morphological types of horizontal cell in rodent retinae: a comparison of rat, mouse, gerbil, and guinea pig.

    Leo Peichl;Juncal González-Soriano

  • Morphology and Topography of on- and off-Alpha Cells in the Cat Retina

    H. Wässle;L. Peichl;Brian Blundell Boycott

  • Dendritic territories of cat retinal ganglion cells.

    H. Wässle;L. Peichl;B. B. Boycott

  • Size, scatter and coverage of ganglion cell receptive field centres in the cat retina.

    L Peichl;H Wässle

  • Cholinergic amacrine cells of the rabbit retina contain glutamate decarboxylase and gamma-aminobutyrate immunoreactivity.

    Nicholas Brecha;Donald Johnson;Leo Peichl;Heinz Wassle

  • Morphological identification of on- and off-centre brisk transient (Y) cells in the cat retina.

    L Peichl;H Wässle

  • For whales and seals the ocean is not blue: a visual pigment loss in marine mammals*

    Leo Peichl;Günther Behrmann;Ronald H. H. Kröger

  • Alpha Ganglion Cells in Mammalian Retinae

    L. Peichl;H. Ott;Brian Blundell Boycott

  • An alternative pathway for rod signals in the rodent retina: rod photoreceptors, cone bipolar cells, and the localization of glutamate receptors.

    Iris Hack;Leo Peichl;Johann Helmut Brandstätter

  • Alpha and delta ganglion cells in the rat retina

    Leo Peichl

  • The structural correlate of the receptive field centre of alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina.

    L Peichl;H Wässle

  • Matching populations of amacrine cells in the inner nuclear and ganglion cell layers of the rabbit retina

    David I. Vaney;Leo Peichl;B. B. Boycott

  • Topography of cones and rods in the tree shrew retina.

    Brigitte Müller;Leo Peichl

  • Alpha ganglion cells in mammalian retinae: common properties, species differences, and some comments on other ganglion cells.

    Leo Peichl

  • Avian Ultraviolet/Violet Cones Identified as Probable Magnetoreceptors

    Christine Nießner;Susanne Denzau;Julia Christina Gross;Leo Peichl

  • Topography of horizontal cells in the retina of the domestic cat

    H. Wässle;L. Peichl;Brian Blundell Boycott

  • Alpha ganglion cells in the rabbit retina.

    Leo Peichl;Eberhard H. Buhl;Brian B. Boycott

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinz Wässle
Heinz Wässle Max Planck Society
Hynek Burda
Hynek Burda University of Duisburg-Essen
Francisco Bozinovic
Francisco Bozinovic Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Johann Helmut Brandstätter
Johann Helmut Brandstätter University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
David Hunt
David Hunt University of Edinburgh
Thomas Cremer
Thomas Cremer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
David I. Vaney
David I. Vaney University of Queensland
Hans-Joachim Bischof
Hans-Joachim Bischof Bielefeld University
Heinrich Leonhardt
Heinrich Leonhardt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Andreas Reichenbach
Andreas Reichenbach Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Leo Peichl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles