World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 128 87 45 367 57311

H. von Boehmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by H. von Boehmer between 1968 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. H. von Boehmer published across 50 years, from 1968 to 2017, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2006. 1 of the 425 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2006. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 11 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 9 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 12 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 17 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 22 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1968 2017

425 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
H. von Boehmer: publications per year, 1968 to 2017
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 1
1970 1
1971 0
1972 4
1973 6
1974 5
1975 11
1976 7
1977 3
1978 5
1979 9
1980 6
1981 4
1982 6
1983 12
1984 6
1985 5
1986 9
1987 3
1988 12
1989 8
1990 9
1991 10
1992 10
1993 17
1994 11
1995 15
1996 11
1997 20
1998 7
1999 13
2000 6
2001 13
2002 19
2003 19
2004 18
2005 11
2006 22
2007 8
2008 16
2009 8
2010 13
2011 9
2012 8
2013 4
2014 3
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
Total 425
Download as CSV

H. von Boehmer publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. von Boehmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 365–374 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 367 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65 367
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

H. von Boehmer D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. von Boehmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 127+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95 128
Download as CSV

Overview

H. von Boehmer was affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States during their scientific career. The scientist made contributions primarily through academic research in biomedical sciences aligned with this institution.

Though there are no recent papers listed with specific titles or years of publication, von Boehmer's consistent engagement with scholarly output is implied by their presence in academic circles at a leading medical school.

No specific frequent co-authors or publication venues were recorded, indicating a lack of available data on collaborative networks or common journals for von Boehmer's work.

Similarly, there are no noted book publications or main fields and subfields of study detailed for this scientist, limiting insights into precise areas of specialization or thematic focus.

Being deceased, von Boehmer's contributions are situated fully in the past and represent a historical component of their affiliated institution's academic record.

Best Publications

  • Projection of an Immunological Self Shadow Within the Thymus by the Aire Protein

    Mark S. Anderson;Emily S. Venanzi;Ludger Klein;Zhibin Chen

  • Tolerance in T-cell-receptor transgenic mice involves deletion of nonmature CD4 + 8 + thymocytes

    P Kisielow;H Blüthmann;U D Staerz;M Steinmetz

  • Inducing and expanding regulatory T cell populations by foreign antigen.

    Karsten Kretschmer;Irina Apostolou;Daniel Hawiger;Khashayarsha Khazaie

  • Mechanisms of suppression by suppressor T cells

    Harald von Boehmer

  • Origin of regulatory T cells with known specificity for antigen

    Irina Apostolou;Adelaida Sarukhan;Ludger Klein;Harald von Boehmer

  • Regulatory T cells suppress tumor-specific CD8 T cell cytotoxicity through TGF-β signals in vivo

    Mei Ling Chen;Mikaël J. Pittet;Leonid Gorelik;Leonid Gorelik;Richard A. Flavell

  • In vivo instruction of suppressor commitment in naive T cells.

    Irina Apostolou;Harald von Boehmer

  • Peripheral Selection of the T Cell Repertoire

    B Rocha;H von Boehmer

  • Foxp3 occupancy and regulation of key target genes during T-cell stimulation

    Alexander Marson;Karsten Kretschmer;Garrett M. Frampton;Elizabeth S. Jacobsen

  • DNA methylation controls Foxp3 gene expression.

    Julia K. Polansky;Karsten Kretschmer;Karsten Kretschmer;Jennifer Freyer;Stefan Floess

  • Thymic major histocompatibility complex antigens and the alpha beta T-cell receptor determine the CD4/CD8 phenotype of T cells.

    Hung Sia Teh;Hung Sia Teh;Hung Sia Teh;Pawel Kisielow;Pawel Kisielow;Pawel Kisielow;Bernadette Scott;Hiroyuki Kishi

  • Developmental biology of T cells in T cell-receptor transgenic mice.

    H. von Boehmer

  • Positive selection of antigen-specific T cells in thymus by restricting MHC molecules

    P. Kisielow;Hung Sia Teh;Hung Sia Teh;H. Blüthmann;H. Von Boehmer

  • Positive selection of lymphocytes.

    Harald von Boehmer

  • Transfer of specificity by murine alpha and beta T-cell receptor genes.

    Dembić Z;Haas W;Weiss S;McCubrey J

  • Crucial role of the pre-T-cell receptor alpha gene in development of alpha beta but not gamma delta T cells.

    H J Fehling;A Krotkova;C Saint-Ruf;H von Boehmer

  • Frontline: Neuropilin-1: a surface marker of regulatory T cells

    Dunja Bruder;Michael Probst-Kepper;Astrid M. Westendorf;Robert Geffers

  • Notch 1 activation in the molecular pathogenesis of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Clemens Grabher;Harald von Boehmer;A. Thomas Look

  • MHC class I expression in mice lacking the proteasome subunit LMP-7

    HJ Fehling;W Swat;C Laplace;R Kuhn

  • Thymic selection of CD8+ single positive cells with a class II major histocompatibility complex-restricted receptor.

    J Kirberg;A Baron;S Jakob;A Rolink

  • Analysis and expression of a cloned pre-T cell receptor gene.

    C Saint-Ruf;K Ungewiss;M Groettrup;L Bruno

  • Major histocompatibility complex-linked immune-responsiveness is acquired by lymphocytes of low-responder mice differentiating in thymus of high-responder mice.

    H von Boehmer;W Haas;N K Jerne

  • In transgenic mice the introduced functional T cell receptor β gene prevents expression of endogenous β genes

    Yasushi Uematsu;Stefan Ryser;Stefan Ryser;Zlatko Dembić;Zlatko Dembić;Peter Borgulya

  • Self-nonself discrimination by T cells.

    H von Boehmer;P Kisielow

  • Requirement for cyclin D3 in lymphocyte development and T cell leukemias.

    Ewa Sicinska;Iannis Aifantis;Laurent Le Cam;Wojciech Swat

  • The developmental biology of T lymphocytes.

    H. Von Boehmer

  • Commitment and Developmental Potential of Extrathymic and Intrathymic T Cell Precursors: Plenty to Choose from

    Avinash Bhandoola;Harald von Boehmer;Howard T. Petrie;Juan Carlos Zúñiga-Pflücker

  • Expression of T-cell antigen receptor genes during fetal development in the thymus

    H. Ralph Snodgrass;Zlatko Dembić;Michael Steinmetz;Harald von Boehmer

  • Stage-Specific and Differential Notch Dependency at the αβ and γδ T Lineage Bifurcation

    Maria Ciofani;Gisèle C. Knowles;David L. Wiest;Harald von Boehmer

  • Deletion of autospecific T cells in T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic mice spares cells with normal TCR levels and low levels of CD8 molecules

    Hung-Sia Teh;H. Kishi;B. Scott;H. Von Boehmer

  • Frontline: Neuropilin‐1: a surface marker of regulatory T cells (Vol. 34(3) 2004, pp 623–630, DOI 10.1002/eji.200324799)

    Dunja Bruder;Michael Probst-Kepper;Astrid M. Westendorf;Robert Geffers

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Sprent
Jonathan Sprent Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Anton Berns
Anton Berns Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
Zlatko Dembic
Zlatko Dembic University of Oslo
Jan Buer
Jan Buer University of Duisburg-Essen
Fritz Melchers
Fritz Melchers Leibniz Association
James C. Kaufman
James C. Kaufman University of Connecticut
Hans G. Zachau
Hans G. Zachau Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wojciech Swat
Wojciech Swat Washington University in St. Louis
Ulrich Walter
Ulrich Walter Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced with additional online education. For example, professionals interested in health data can pursue an accredited online health information management degree cahiim. This degree equips students with crucial skills for managing healthcare information systems, bridging the gap between science and technology.

For those inclined toward administrative roles in healthcare, accelerated programs like the accelerated medical billing and coding certificate online offer a fast track into the industry. These certificates complement microbiology knowledge for a well-rounded professional profile.

While many medical degrees require in-person training, prospective students should explore what medical degree can i get online to understand available options and accreditation standards.

Furthering education with public health expertise is also a practical choice. Several mph online programs with easy admission requirements provide accessible pathways for microbiologists aiming to impact community and global health initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing H. von Boehmer

Recently Published Articles