World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
31053
World Ranking
7760
National Ranking
760

Richard Poulsom publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Poulsom sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 306 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard Poulsom D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Poulsom sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Poulsom is affiliated with Queen Mary University of London in the United Kingdom and has contributed to the fields of Medicine as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research spans several subfields including Oncology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Artificial Intelligence.

They have published extensively on topics related to cancer biology and diagnostics, with primary research interests covering Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, AI in cancer detection, Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, and Extracellular vesicles in disease.

Richard Poulsom has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including C. Simon Herrington and Philip J. Coates, with whom they have multiple joint publications, as well as Hartmut Koeppen, J. Louise Jones, and Nischalan Pillay.

Their work has been published mainly in the following venues:

  • The Journal of Pathology
  • The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard Poulsom include:

  • Recent Advances in Pathology: the 2020 Annual Review Issue of The Journal of Pathology (2020)
  • Recent Advances in Pathology: the 2021 Annual Review Issue of The Journal of Pathology (2021)
  • Recent Advances in Pathology: the 2023 Annual Review Issue of The Journal of Pathology (2023)
  • Recent Advances in Pathology: the 2022 Annual Review Issue of The Journal of Pathology (2022)
  • Issue Information, The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research (2022)

Best Publications

  • Lgr5+ve Stem Cells Drive Self-Renewal in the Stomach and Build Long-Lived Gastric Units In Vitro

    Nick Barker;Meritxell Huch;Pekka Kujala;Marc van de Wetering

  • Hepatocytes from non-hepatic adult stem cells

    Malcolm R. Alison;Richard Poulsom;Rosemary Jeffery;Amar P. Dhillon

  • Accumulation of Krebs cycle intermediates and over-expression of HIF1alpha in tumours which result from germline FH and SDH mutations.

    P. J. Pollard;J. J. Briere;N. A. Alam;J. Barwell

  • Bone marrow contributes to renal parenchymal turnover and regeneration

    Richard Poulsom;Stuart J. Forbes;Kairbaan Hodivala-Dilke;Eoin Ryan

  • Bone marrow contribution to tumor-associated myofibroblasts and fibroblasts.

    Natalie C. Direkze;Kairbaan Hodivala-Dilke;Rosemary Jeffery;Toby Hunt

  • Up-regulation of Delta-like 4 Ligand in Human Tumor Vasculature and the Role of Basal Expression in Endothelial Cell Function

    Nilay S. Patel;Ji-Liang Li;Daniele Generali;Richard Poulsom

  • Expression of the Type 1 Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor Is Up-Regulated in Primary Prostate Cancer and Commonly Persists in Metastatic Disease

    Giles O. Hellawell;Gareth D. H. Turner;David R. Davies;Richard Poulsom

  • Stromal expression of 72 kda type IV collagenase (MMP-2) and TIMP-2 mRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.

    Richard Poulsom;Massimo Pignatelli;Massimo Pignatelli;William G. Stetler-Stevenson;Lance A. Liotta

  • Lrig1 controls intestinal stem-cell homeostasis by negative regulation of ErbB signalling

    Vivian W. Y. Wong;Daniel E. Stange;Mahalia E. Page;Mahalia E. Page;Simon Buczacki

  • Exogenous mesenchymal stem cells localize to the kidney by means of CD44 following acute tubular injury

    M.B. Herrera;B. Bussolati;S. Bruno;L. Morando

  • An introduction to stem cells.

    Malcolm R. Alison;Richard Poulsom;Stuart Forbes;Nicholas A. Wright

  • Magic roundabout is a new member of the roundabout receptor family that is endothelial specific and expressed at sites of active angiogenesis.

    Lukasz Huminiecki;Michael Gorn;Steven Suchting;Richard Poulsom

  • Adult stem cell plasticity

    Richard Poulsom;Malcolm R. Alison;Stuart J. Forbes;Stuart J. Forbes;Nicholas A. Wright;Nicholas A. Wright

  • Expression of the Met/Hepatocyte Growth Factor Receptor in Human Pancreatic Cancer

    M. F. Di Renzo;R. Poulsom;M. Olivero;P. M. Comoglio

  • Trefoil peptide gene expression in gastrointestinal epithelial cells in inflammatory bowel disease

    Nicholas A. Wright;Richard Poulsom;Gordon Stamp;Susan Van Noorden

  • Bottom-up Histogenesis of Colorectal Adenomas Origin in the Monocryptal Adenoma and Initial Expansion by Crypt Fission

    Sean L Preston;Wai-Man Wong;Annie On-On Chan;Richard Poulsom

  • A novel gene (PLU-1) containing highly conserved putative DNA/chromatin binding motifs is specifically up-regulated in breast cancer.

    Pei Juan Lu;Kristina Sundquist;Dan Baeckstrom;Richard Poulsom

  • Bone marrow derivation of pericryptal myofibroblasts in the mouse and human small intestine and colon

    M Brittan;T Hunt;R Jeffery;R Poulsom

  • The S100 Family Heterodimer, MRP-8/14, Binds with High Affinity to Heparin and Heparan Sulfate Glycosaminoglycans on Endothelial Cells

    Matthew J. Robinson;Philippe Tessier;Richard Poulsom;Nancy Hogg

  • Bone marrow-derived cells contribute to podocyte regeneration and amelioration of renal disease in a mouse model of Alport syndrome.

    Evangelia I Prodromidi;Richard Poulsom;Rosemary Jeffery;Candice A Roufosse

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas A. Wright
Nicholas A. Wright Queen Mary University of London
Ian Tomlinson
Ian Tomlinson University of Oxford
Stuart J. Forbes
Stuart J. Forbes University of Edinburgh
Gordon Stamp
Gordon Stamp The Francis Crick Institute
Trevor A. Graham
Trevor A. Graham Institute of Cancer Research
Kairbaan Hodivala-Dilke
Kairbaan Hodivala-Dilke Queen Mary University of London
Elinor J. Sawyer
Elinor J. Sawyer King's College London
Bradley Spencer-Dene
Bradley Spencer-Dene The Francis Crick Institute
Walter F. Bodmer
Walter F. Bodmer University of Oxford
Ray Boot-Handford
Ray Boot-Handford University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a future in Medicine, various online degrees and career pathways can help accelerate your journey or expand your qualifications. For registered nurses looking to advance their education, the rn to bsn online with no clinicals option is a flexible choice, allowing you to upgrade your credentials without additional hands-on requirements.

Aspiring nurse practitioners or those seeking leadership roles can consider the quickest dnp program options to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently. Some professionals may prefer pathways that are less research-intensive, such as dnp programs without dissertation, which streamline graduation without the traditional dissertation process.

If your goal is entry into nursing as soon as possible, learning about what is the fastest way to become an lpn can guide you through available accelerated and online Licensed Practical Nurse programs.

No matter your background or career goals, the flexibility of online programs and diverse pathways makes it easier to advance in healthcare while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Poulsom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles