World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
22097
World Ranking
16733
National Ranking
8393

Richard G. Weleber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard G. Weleber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 346 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard G. Weleber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard G. Weleber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - The Llura Liggett Gund Award, Foundation Fighting Blindness for career achievement in the field of retinal-disease therapies.

Overview

Richard G. Weleber is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily focuses on ophthalmology and molecular biology, with additional work in neurology, radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. Genetics also forms a part of their scientific investigations.

The scientist's main areas of study include retinal development and disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, retinal and optic conditions, glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal and macular surgery, barrier structure and function studies, and mechanisms of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.

Frequent publication venues for Richard G. Weleber include the American Journal of Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Experimental Eye Research, Translational Vision Science & Technology, and PLoS Genetics.

  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Experimental Eye Research
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • PLoS Genetics

The scientist has coauthored multiple publications with:

  • Mark E. Pennesi
  • Paul Yang
  • Cristy A. Ku
  • Mariana Matioli da Palma
  • Andreas Lauer

Recent papers authored by or involving Richard G. Weleber include:

  • Three-Year Safety Results of SAR422459 (EIAV-ABCA4) Gene Therapy in Patients With ABCA4-Associated Stargardt Disease: An Open-Label Dose-Escalation Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial, Cohorts 1-5, 2022, American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Suppression of cGMP-Dependent Photoreceptor Cytotoxicity With Mycophenolate Is Neuroprotective in Murine Models of Retinitis Pigmentosa, 2020, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Deciphering the genetic architecture and ethnographic distribution of IRD in three ethnic populations by whole genome sequence analysis, 2021, PLoS Genetics
  • Genotype Phenotype Correlation and Variability in Microcephaly Associated With Chorioretinopathy or Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy, 2020, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
  • Functional evaluation in inherited retinal disease, 2021, British Journal of Ophthalmology

Richard G. Weleber has been recognized with The Llura Liggett Gund Award from the Foundation Fighting Blindness in 2016 for career achievement in the field of retinal-disease therapies.

Best Publications

  • Long-Term Effect of Gene Therapy on Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis

    James W B Bainbridge;James W B Bainbridge;Manjit S Mehat;Venki Sundaram;Scott J Robbie

  • Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract Associated with a Missense Mutation in the Human Alpha Crystallin Gene CRYAA

    Michael Litt;Patricia Kramer;Dante M. LaMorticella;William Murphey

  • Mutation of a nuclear receptor gene, NR2E3, causes enhanced S cone syndrome, a disorder of retinal cell fate

    Neena B. Haider;Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ruth Swiderski

  • Evaluation of Grid Pattern Photocoagulation for Macular Edema in Central Vein Occlusion: The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M Report

    John G. Clarkson;Elaine Chuang;Donald Gass;Maria Pedroso

  • Phenotypic Variation Including Retinitis Pigmentosa, Pattern Dystrophy, and Fundus Flavimaculatus in a Single Family With a Deletion of Codon 153 or 154 of the Peripherin/RDS Gene

    Richard G. Weleber;Ronald E. Carr;Ronald E. Carr;Ronald E. Carr;William H. Murphey;Val C. Sheffield

  • Identification of the gene (BBS1) most commonly involved in Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a complex human obesity syndrome.

    Kirk Mykytyn;Darryl Y. Nishimura;Charles C. Searby;Mythreyi Shastri

  • Molecular Genetics of Human Blue Cone Monochromacy

    Jeremy Nathans;Carol M. Davenport;Irene H. Maumenee;Richard Alan Lewis

  • Mutations in NYX, encoding the leucine-rich proteoglycan nyctalopin, cause X-linked complete congenital stationary night blindness.

    N.Torben Bech-Hansen;Margaret J. Naylor;Tracy A. Maybaum;Rebecca L. Sparkes

  • Dose-response relationship between light irradiance and the suppression of plasma melatonin in human volunteers.

    George C. Brainard;Alfred J. Lewy;Michael Menaker;Richard H. Fredrickson

  • Age-related macular degeneration: Clinical features in a large family and linkage to chromosome 1q

    Michael L. Klein;Dennis W. Schultz;Al Edwards;Tara C. Matise

  • Comparative Genomics and Gene Expression Analysis Identifies BBS9, a New Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Gene

    Darryl Y. Nishimura;Ruth E. Swiderski;Charles C. Searby;Erik M. Berg

  • Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy: clinical features, molecular genetics and therapeutic interventions

    Neruban Kumaran;Anthony T Moore;Richard G Weleber;Michel Michaelides;Michel Michaelides;Michel Michaelides

  • Bietti crystalline corneoretinal dystrophy is caused by mutations in the novel gene CYP4V2.

    Anren Li;Xiaodong Jiao;Francis L. Munier;Daniel F. Schorderet

  • Mutations in the CRB1 Gene Cause Leber Congenital Amaurosis

    Andrew J. Lotery;Samuel G. Jacobson;Gerald A. Fishman;Richard G. Weleber

  • CNGB3 mutations account for 50% of all cases with autosomal recessive achromatopsia

    Susanne Kohl;Balazs Varsanyi;Balazs Varsanyi;Gesine Abadin Antunes;Britta Baumann

  • Frequency of Usher syndrome in two pediatric populations: Implications for genetic screening of deaf and hard of hearing children.

    William J Kimberling;William J Kimberling;Michael S Hildebrand;A Eliot Shearer;Maren L Jensen

  • Autoantibodies against retinal proteins in paraneoplastic and autoimmune retinopathy

    Grazyna Adamus;Gaoying Ren;Richard G Weleber

  • Age-Related Macular Degeneration—a Genome Scan in Extended Families

    Jacek Majewski;Dennis W. Schultz;Richard G. Weleber;Mitchell B. Schain

  • Autosomal-dominant congenital cataract associated with a deletion mutation in the human beaded filament protein gene BFSP2.

    Petra M. Jakobs;John F. Hess;Paul G. FitzGerald;Patricia Kramer

  • Analysis of the ARMD1 locus: evidence that a mutation in HEMICENTIN-1 is associated with age-related macular degeneration in a large family

    Dennis W. Schultz;Michael L. Klein;Andrea J. Humpert;Christina W. Luzier

Frequent Co-Authors

Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa
Samuel G. Jacobson
Samuel G. Jacobson University of Pennsylvania
Gerald A. Fishman
Gerald A. Fishman University of Illinois at Chicago
John R. Heckenlively
John R. Heckenlively University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Val C. Sheffield
Val C. Sheffield University of Iowa
David G. Birch
David G. Birch The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ted S. Acott
Ted S. Acott Oregon Health & Science University
David Huang
David Huang Oregon Health & Science University
Jurg Ott
Jurg Ott Rockefeller University
Anthony T. Moore
Anthony T. Moore University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a traditional medical degree in the USA can be time-consuming and expensive, but a variety of related online programs provide more flexible and affordable options. Those already holding an RN license may consider the cheapest rn to bsn program options to advance their career and earning potential with minimal financial burden.

If you have a non-nursing background, entry level msn programs online open doors to a nursing career and leadership roles in healthcare in less time. For students concerned about competitive admissions, there are nursing programs with high acceptance rates that can make it easier to start your journey.

Not everyone interested in healthcare wants to work directly with patients. Another promising path is medical billing and coding. Explore medical billing and coding financial aid opportunities to find accredited programs that fit your budget.

Best Scientists Citing Richard G. Weleber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles