World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 70 1942 1767 163 154 269 17559
Molecular Biology 69 1473 1318 114 103 258 17256

Peter Ghazal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Ghazal between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Ghazal published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2006. 18 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2006. 1985: 3 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 20 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 9 publications
1985 2025

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Ghazal: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 3
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 4
1990 4
1991 5
1992 2
1993 7
1994 3
1995 3
1996 5
1997 1
1998 4
1999 8
2000 9
2001 7
2002 9
2003 7
2004 13
2005 14
2006 20
2007 9
2008 19
2009 19
2010 13
2011 17
2012 12
2013 16
2014 16
2015 7
2016 8
2017 8
2018 3
2019 2
2020 5
2021 5
2022 14
2023 11
2024 9
2025 9
Total 335
Download as CSV

Peter Ghazal publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Ghazal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 257–266 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 258 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53 258
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Ghazal D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Ghazal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97 69
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Peter Ghazal is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and has an extensive record of scientific publications primarily in the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research spans several areas, with a strong focus on sepsis, immune response, and molecular biology.

Their recent papers cover various aspects of immunology, inflammation, and metabolism related to critical illness and bacterial infection. Notable publications include:

  • Therapeutic potential of IL6R blockade for the treatment of sepsis and sepsis-related death, 2023, PLoS Medicine
  • Oxylipin metabolism is controlled by mitochondrial β-oxidation during bacterial inflammation, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Microbial exposure drives polyclonal expansion of innate γδ T cells immediately after birth, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Low circulatory levels of total cholesterol, HDL-C and LDL-C are associated with death of patients with sepsis and critical illness: systematic review, meta-analysis, and perspective of observational studies, 2024, EBioMedicine
  • Immune-metabolic adaptations in pregnancy: A potential stepping-stone to sepsis, 2022, EBioMedicine

Frequent coauthors appearing in their work include:

  • Fergus Hamilton
  • Nicholas J. Timpson
  • Ruth E. Mitchell
  • Patrícia Rodrigues
  • Valerie B. O'Donnell

The scientist's research has often been published in recurring venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • EBioMedicine
  • BMJ Open
  • Nature Communications
  • Scientific Reports

Main fields of study include Medicine, encompassing a significant number of publications focused on Epidemiology and Immunology. Their subfields of interest also cover Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Key thematic topics addressed in their research are:

  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Inflammasome and immune disorders
  • Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Diabetes and associated disorders

Peter Ghazal has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom, indicating a professional acknowledgment in the field of medical research.

Best Publications

  • The Systems Biology Graphical Notation

    Nicolas Le Novere;Michael Hucka;Huaiyu Mi;Stuart Moodie

  • Statistical methods for analysis of high-throughput RNA interference screens

    Amanda Birmingham;Laura M Selfors;Thorsten Forster;David Wrobel

  • Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project

    Chris F. Taylor;Chris F. Taylor;Dawn Field;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Jan Aerts

  • Synaptic NMDA receptor activity boosts intrinsic antioxidant defenses

    Sofia Papadia;Francesc X Soriano;Frédéric Léveillé;Marc-Andre Martel

  • Human cytomegalovirus inhibits antigen presentation by a sequential multistep process

    Kwangseog Ahn;Ana Angulo;Peter Ghazal;Per A. Peterson

  • High-resolution gene expression profiling for simultaneous kinetic parameter analysis of RNA synthesis and decay

    Lars Dölken;Zsolt Ruzsics;Bernd Rädle;Caroline C. Friedel

  • The Transcription Factor STAT-1 Couples Macrophage Synthesis of 25-Hydroxycholesterol to the Interferon Antiviral Response

    Mathieu Blanc;Wei Yuan Hsieh;Kevin A. Robertson;Kai A. Kropp

  • Human cytomegalovirus productively infects primary differentiated macrophages.

    C E Ibanez;R Schrier;Peter Ghazal;C Wiley

  • Hijacking and exploitation of IL-10 by intracellular pathogens.

    Stella Redpath;Peter Ghazal;Nicholas R.J Gascoigne

  • DNA microarrays of the complex human cytomegalovirus genome: profiling kinetic class with drug sensitivity of viral gene expression.

    James Chambers;Ana Angulo;Dhammika Amaratunga;Hongqing Guo

  • Complete Genome Sequence and Lytic Phase Transcription Profile of a Coccolithovirus

    William H. Wilson;Declan C. Schroeder;Michael J. Allen;Matthew T. G. Holden

  • Host Defense against Viral Infection Involves Interferon Mediated Down-Regulation of Sterol Biosynthesis

    Mathieu Blanc;Wei Yuan Hsieh;Kevin A. Robertson;Steven Watterson

  • Screening for mammalian neural genes via fluorescence-activated cell sorter purification of neural precursors from Sox1-gfp knock-in mice.

    Jerome Aubert;Marios P. Stavridis;Susan Tweedie;Michelle O'Reilly

  • STAT2 deficiency and susceptibility to viral illness in humans

    Sophie Hambleton;Stephen Goodbourn;Dan F. Young;Paul Dickinson

  • Promoter-specific trans activation and repression by human cytomegalovirus immediate-early proteins involves common and unique protein domains.

    R M Stenberg;J Fortney;S W Barlow;B P Magrane

  • Annexation of the interchromosomal space during viral infection.

    Karine Monier;Juan Carlos González Armas;Susanne Etteldorf;Peter Ghazal

  • Defective Interleukin (IL)-18–mediated Natural Killer and T Helper Cell Type 1 Responses in IL-1 Receptor–associated Kinase (IRAK)-deficient Mice

    Palanisamy Kanakaraj;Karen Ngo;Ying Wu;Ana Angulo

  • Impaired Immunoproteasome Assembly and Immune Responses in PA28−/− Mice

    Tobias Preckel;Wai Ping Fung-Leung;Zeling Cai;Antonella Vitiello

  • Murine Cytomegalovirus Infection Down-Regulates MHC Class II Expression on Macrophages by Induction of IL-10

    Stella Redpath;Ana Angulo;Nicholas R. J. Gascoigne;Peter Ghazal

  • The enhancer domain of the human cytomegalovirus major immediate-early promoter determines cell type-specific expression in transgenic mice.

    John F. Baskar;Patricia P. Smith;Gajanan Nilaver;Ray A. Jupp

  • Discussion on the paper by Handcock, Raftery and Tantrum

    Tom A. B. Snijders;Tony Robinson;Anthony C. Atkinson;Marco Riani

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay A. Nelson
Jay A. Nelson Oregon Health & Science University
Martin Messerle
Martin Messerle Hannover Medical School
Anthony J. Walton
Anthony J. Walton University of Edinburgh
Roy D. Sleator
Roy D. Sleator Munster Technological University
Edward K. Wagner
Edward K. Wagner University of California, Irvine
Kate Templeton
Kate Templeton NHS Lothian
Tom C. Freeman
Tom C. Freeman University of Edinburgh
Katie L. Flanagan
Katie L. Flanagan RMIT University
Lothar Hennighausen
Lothar Hennighausen National Institutes of Health
Dennis R. Burton
Dennis R. Burton Scripps Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Molecular Biology, exploring broader healthcare and science career options can be valuable. Many pursue advanced health degrees to expand opportunities. For example, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online provide a pathway for candidates with a science background to transition swiftly into a nursing career, even if they are not licensed nurses.

Choosing the right program is crucial. Comparing institutions like Capella and Chamberlain can help you make an informed choice, such as examining differences in flexibility, cost, and course content in capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn programs.

For those already holding an RN, bridge programs are a popular route. You might consider rn to bsn to msn online programs that allow working professionals to advance their careers while balancing other commitments.

Lastly, selecting non profit universities ensures your education comes from reputable institutions, often with greater financial transparency and accredited programs.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Ghazal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles