World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 58 2114 1902 22 19 99 9550

Naomi Goldfinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Naomi Goldfinger between 1985 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Naomi Goldfinger published across 40 years, from 1985 to 2024, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2023. 64 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2023. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 62 publications 2024: 2 publications
1985 2024

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Naomi Goldfinger: publications per year, 1985 to 2024
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 4
1992 1
1993 5
1994 2
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 4
2000 1
2001 6
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 4
2008 3
2009 6
2010 4
2011 5
2012 5
2013 5
2014 3
2015 0
2016 3
2017 2
2018 3
2019 3
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 62
2024 2
Total 161
Download as CSV

Naomi Goldfinger publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Goldfinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 99 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131 99
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Naomi Goldfinger D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naomi Goldfinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129 58
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Naomi Goldfinger is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these domains, their work focuses on several subfields including Molecular Biology, Physiology, Oncology, and Biotechnology.

The scientist's research encompasses a range of topics related to cellular and molecular mechanisms. These include:

  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways

Naomi Goldfinger has contributed to recent publications that explore critical biological processes and disease mechanisms. These recent papers are:

  • "Egr1 regulates regenerative senescence and cardiac repair," published in 2024 in Nature Cardiovascular Research
  • "Mutant p53 reactivation restricts the protumorigenic consequences of wild type p53 loss of heterozygosity in Li-Fraumeni syndrome patient-derived fibroblasts," published in 2024 in Cell Death and Differentiation

These publications have been cited in subsequent research, reflecting engagement within the scientific community.

Collaborations have involved frequent coauthors with whom Naomi Goldfinger has published multiple times. These coauthors include:

  • Varda Rotter
  • Lingling Zhang
  • Jacob Elkahal
  • Tianzhen Wang
  • Racheli Rimmer

Naomi Goldfinger's work appears regularly in scientific journals such as Nature Cardiovascular Research and Cell Death and Differentiation, indicating a focus on cardiovascular biology and cell death mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Nuclear accumulation of p53 protein is mediated by several nuclear localization signals and plays a role in tumorigenesis.

    G. Shaulsky;N. Goldfinger;Avri Ben-Ze'ev;V. Rotter

  • Meth A fibrosarcoma cells express two transforming mutant p53 species.

    Eliyahu D;Goldfinger N;Pinhasi-Kimhi O;Shaulsky G

  • Epigenetic polymorphism and the stochastic formation of differentially methylated regions in normal and cancerous tissues

    Gilad Landan;Netta Mendelson Cohen;Zohar Mukamel;Amir Bar

  • Activated p53 suppresses the histone methyltransferase EZH2 gene

    Xiaohu Tang;Michael Milyavsky;Igor Shats;Neta Erez

  • Mice with reduced levels of p53 protein exhibit the testicular giant-cell degenerative syndrome.

    Varda Rotter;Dov Schwartz;Einat Almon;Naomi Goldfinger

  • Nuclear localization is essential for the activity of p53 protein.

    G Shaulsky;N Goldfinger;M S Tosky;A J Levine

  • Regulation of AIF expression by p53

    P Stambolsky;L Weisz;I Shats;Y Klein

  • Involvement of wild-type p53 in pre-B-cell differentiation in vitro.

    Gad Shaulsky;Naomi Goldfinger;Alpha Peled;Varda Rotter

  • p53 Plays a Role in Mesenchymal Differentiation Programs, in a Cell Fate Dependent Manner

    Alina Molchadsky;Igor Shats;Naomi Goldfinger;Meirav Pevsner-Fischer

  • Change of the death pathway in senescent human fibroblasts in response to DNA damage is caused by an inability to stabilize p53.

    Andrei Seluanov;Vera Gorbunova;Ayellet Falcovitz;Alex Sigal

  • Expression of p53 protein in spermatogenesis is confined to the tetraploid pachytene primary spermatocytes

    D Schwartz;N Goldfinger;V Rotter

  • Genome-wide profiling of histone h3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 trimethylation reveals an epigenetic signature in prostate carcinogenesis.

    Xi-Song Ke;Yi Qu;Kari Rostad;Wen-Cheng Li;Wen-Cheng Li

  • Mutant p53 protein expression interferes with p53-independent apoptotic pathways.

    Runzhao Li;Patrick D. Sutphin;Dov Schwartz;Devorah Matas

  • Prolonged Culture of Telomerase-Immortalized Human Fibroblasts Leads to a Premalignant Phenotype

    Michael Milyavsky;Igor Shats;Neta Erez;Xiaohu Tang

  • Retraction: Transactivation of the EGR1 Gene Contributes to Mutant p53 Gain of Function.

    Lilach Weisz;Amir Zalcenstein;Perry Stambolsky;Yehudit Cohen

  • Mutant p53 R175H upregulates Twist1 expression and promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in immortalized prostate cells

    I. Kogan-Sakin;Y. Tabach;Y. Buganim;A. Molchadsky

  • p53-repressed miRNAs are involved with E2F in a feed-forward loop promoting proliferation

    Ran Brosh;Reut Shalgi;Atar Liran;Gilad Landan

  • Alterations in tumor development in vivo mediated by expression of wild type or mutant p53 proteins.

    Gad Shaulsky;Naomi Goldfinger;Varda Rotter

  • Mutant p53 facilitates somatic cell reprogramming and augments the malignant potential of reprogrammed cells

    Rachel Sarig;Noa Rivlin;Ran Brosh;Chamutal Bornstein

  • Testicular tissue-specific expression of the p53 suppressor gene.

    Einat Almon;Naomi Goldfinger;Ahuva Kapon;Dov Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Varda Rotter
Varda Rotter Weizmann Institute of Science
Moshe Oren
Moshe Oren Weizmann Institute of Science
Gad Shaulsky
Gad Shaulsky Baylor College of Medicine
Lars A. Akslen
Lars A. Akslen University of Bergen
Curtis C. Harris
Curtis C. Harris National Institutes of Health
Iris Barshack
Iris Barshack Sheba Medical Center
Arnold J. Levine
Arnold J. Levine Institute for Advanced Study
Guillermina Lozano
Guillermina Lozano The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Zohar Yakhini
Zohar Yakhini Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Gideon Rechavi
Gideon Rechavi Sheba Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in molecular biology? There are diverse online degree options and career pathways that can complement your scientific education. For those interested in advanced healthcare roles, direct entry msn programs offer non-nurses a fast track to a Master of Science in Nursing, opening doors in research, clinical leadership, and bioinformatics.

Comparing institutions is crucial for quality and value. Explore the differences between capella university vs wgu rn to bsn programs to find flexible learning environments that fit your schedule and career goals. Additionally, bridge programs like bsn to msn online pathways help registered nurses advance their credentials quickly, often while working.

Quality matters, so consider non profit online universities for accredited programs with strong reputations and student support. Overall, online degrees provide flexible, accessible opportunities to deepen your scientific expertise and expand your career opportunities in health, laboratory work, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Naomi Goldfinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles