World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
16491
World Ranking
18211
National Ranking
9082

Michael L. Steer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael L. Steer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 260 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael L. Steer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael L. Steer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael L. Steer was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research was primarily situated within the field of Health Professions, focusing on aspects of occupational health and safety.

Their work often addressed topics such as:

  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Risk and Safety Analysis

Within this domain, Steer contributed to subfields including Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology, and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

Steer's notable publications include two papers from 2021. The first, titled Implementing the theoretical domains framework in occupational safety: Development of the safety behaviour change questionnaire, appeared in the journal Safety Science. The second paper, Safety Behaviour Change Questionnaire, was published within the PsycTESTS Dataset.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Steer included James I. Morgan, Matteo Curcuruto, and Andrea Bazzoli, each contributing jointly to multiple works.

Steer's publications were primarily featured in the following venues:

  • Safety Science
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Steer's research output focused on the intersection of safety practices and behavioral frameworks, particularly within occupational contexts. The applied nature of their work involved the development of tools such as questionnaires aimed at measuring and influencing safety behavior change.

Best Publications

  • Relationship between severity, necrosis, and apoptosis in five models of experimental acute pancreatitis.

    A. M. Kaiser;A. K. Saluja;Ashok Sengupta;Manju Saluja

  • The role of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and neutrophils in acute pancreatitis and pancreatitis-associated lung injury.

    Jean-Louis Frossard;Ashok Saluja;Lakshmi Bhagat;Hong Sik Lee

  • Role of substance P and the neurokinin 1 receptor in acute pancreatitis and pancreatitis-associated lung injury

    Madhav Bhatia;Ashok K. Saluja;Bernd Hofbauer;Jean Louis Frossard

  • Intra-acinar cell activation of trypsinogen during caerulein-induced pancreatitis in rats

    B. Hofbauer;A. K. Saluja;M. M. Lerch;L. Bhagat

  • Supramaximal caerulein stimulation and ultrastructure of rat pancreatic acinar cell: early morphological changes during development of experimental pancreatitis

    O. Watanabe;F. M. Baccino;M. L. Steer;J. Meldolesi

  • Pancreatic duct obstruction triggers acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the opossum

    Markus M. Lerch;Ashok K. Saluja;Ashok K. Saluja;Michael Rünzi;Michael Rünzi;Rajinder Dawra;Rajinder Dawra

  • The Cell Biology of Experimental Pancreatitis

    Michael L. Steer;Jacopo Meldolesi

  • The use of helical CT and CT angiography to predict vascular involvement from pancreatic cancer: correlation with findings at surgery.

    V Raptopoulos;M L Steer;R G Sheiman;T G Vrachliotis

  • Cerulein-induced in vitro activation of trypsinogen in rat pancreatic acini is mediated by cathepsin B

    Ashok K. Saluja;Erin A. Donovan;Kenji Yamanaka;Yoshikazu Yamaguchi

  • Targeted disruption of the beta-chemokine receptor CCR1 protects against pancreatitis-associated lung injury.

    Craig Gerard;Jean Louis Frossard;Madhav Bhatia;Ashok Saluja

  • Secretagogue-induced digestive enzyme activation and cell injury in rat pancreatic acini.

    A. K. Saluja;L. Bhagat;H. S. Lee;M. Bhatia

  • Subcellular redistribution of lysosomal enzymes during caerulein-induced pancreatitis

    A. Saluja;S. Hashimoto;M. Saluja;R. E. Powers

  • Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions demonstrated by mammography.

    Howard A. Frank;Ferris M. Hall;Michael L. Steer

  • The Binding Characteristics and Number of β -adrenergic Receptors on the Turkey Erythrocyte

    Alexander Levitzki;Daphne Atlas;Michael L. Steer

  • Acute necrotizing pancreatitis in the opossum: Earliest morphological changes involve acinar cells

    M. M. Lerch;Ashok K Saluja;R. Dawra;P. Ramarao

  • Activation of the STAT pathway in acute lung injury.

    Mariano Severgnini;Satoe Takahashi;Liliana M. Rozo;Robert J. Homer

  • Pancreatitis - The role of lysosomes

    Michael L. Steer;Jacopo Meldolesi;Catherine Figarella

  • Inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome pathway–mediated IκBα degradation by a naturally occurring antibacterial peptide

    Youhe Gao;Stewart Lecker;Mark J. Post;Antti J. Hietaranta

  • The control of adenylate cyclase by calcium in turkey erythrocyte ghosts.

    M L Steer;A Levitzki

  • Pathophysiology of pancreatitis. Role of cytokines and other mediators of inflammation.

    Ashok K. Saluja;Michael L. Steer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashok K. Saluja
Ashok K. Saluja University of Miami
Markus M. Lerch
Markus M. Lerch Greifswald University Hospital
Alexander Levitzki
Alexander Levitzki Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Daphne Atlas
Daphne Atlas Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jacopo Meldolesi
Jacopo Meldolesi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Sudhir Agrawal
Sudhir Agrawal University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Philip N. Tsichlis
Philip N. Tsichlis The Ohio State University
Craig Gerard
Craig Gerard Boston Children's Hospital
Norma P. Gerard
Norma P. Gerard Boston Children's Hospital
Athan Kuliopulos
Athan Kuliopulos Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA isn’t limited to traditional medical school. Many students consider alternative and flexible educational pathways, especially through online learning. For those interested in expanding their qualifications quickly, online msn programs for non nurses provide a fast-track option to advanced nursing roles—even for those without prior nursing experience.

If acceptance rates are a concern, some nursing programs with high acceptance rates can offer a less competitive entry point, making a nursing career more accessible. Additionally, individuals who wish to avoid lengthy admissions testing should consider the nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams.

Not all medical careers require clinical work. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding online schools are a highly flexible and in-demand option—often available entirely online with financial aid.

Exploring these diverse online degrees and pathways can open doors in medicine and healthcare, outside the traditional MD route.

Best Scientists Citing Michael L. Steer

Recently Published Articles