World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
119
Citations
56632
World Ranking
267
National Ranking
157

Lawrence A. Loeb publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Loeb sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 483 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Lawrence A. Loeb D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Loeb sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1986 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Lawrence A. Loeb is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has contributed to research primarily across the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their work spans various subfields, including Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Hematology, Genetics, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The scientist has focused extensively on topics related to Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, as well as Genetic factors in colorectal cancer and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies. Their research also covers Genomics and Rare Diseases, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research, and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications.

Lawrence A. Loeb's recent publications include:

  • Rare Mutations in Cancer Drug Resistance and Implications for Therapy, 2020, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • The Processing of Holliday Junctions by BLM and WRN Helicases Is Regulated by p53, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Accurate detection of subclonal variants in paired diagnosis-relapse acute myeloid leukemia samples by next generation Duplex Sequencing, 2022, Leukemia Research
  • Co-Occurring Mutation Clusters Predict Drug Sensitivity in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, 2020, Blood
  • PolyG-DS: An ultrasensitive polyguanine tract-profiling method to detect clonal expansions and trace cell lineage, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their research include Brendan F. Kohrn, Robert A. Beckman, Jack D. Griffith, Ashwini S. Kamath-Loeb, and Elihu H. Estey.

Lawrence A. Loeb's work has been published regularly in venues such as UNC Libraries, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Leukemia Research, Blood, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Recognitions awarded to Lawrence A. Loeb include being named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2016 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1986.

Best Publications

  • 8-Hydroxyguanine, an abundant form of oxidative DNA damage, causes G----T and A----C substitutions.

    Keith C. Cheng;David S. Cahill;Hiroshi Kasai;Susumu Nishimura

  • Mutator Phenotype May Be Required for Multistage Carcinogenesis

    Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Fidelity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

    Bradley D. Preston;Bernard J. Poiesz;Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Mutagenesis by Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Sites

    Lawrence A. Loeb;Bradley D. Preston

  • Protein tolerance to random amino acid change

    Haiwei H. Guo;Juno Choe;Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing

    Michael W. Schmitt;Scott R. Kennedy;Jesse J. Salk;Edward J. Fox

  • Multiple mutations and cancer.

    Lawrence A. Loeb;Keith R. Loeb;Jon P. Anderson

  • A Mutator Phenotype in Cancer

    Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Environmental and chemical carcinogenesis.

    Gerald N. Wogan;Stephen S. Hecht;James S. Felton;Allan H. Conney

  • The contribution of endogenous sources of DNA damage to the multiple mutations in cancer

    Aimee L Jackson;Lawrence A Loeb

  • Reactive Oxygen Species in Tumorigenesis

    Daniel I. Feig;Thomas M. Reid;Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Microsatellite Instability: Marker of a Mutator Phenotype in Cancer

    Lawrence A. Loeb

  • The Werner syndrome protein is a DNA helicase.

    Matthew D. Gray;Jiang Cheng Shen;Ashwini S. Kamath-Loeb;A. Blank

  • Fidelity of DNA Synthesis

    Lawrence A. Loeb;Thomas A. Kunkel

  • Errors in DNA Replication as a Basis of Malignant Changes

    Lawrence A. Loeb;Clark F. Springgate;Narayana Battula

  • Significance of multiple mutations in cancer.

    Keith R. Loeb;Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Enhancing the accuracy of next-generation sequencing for detecting rare and subclonal mutations.

    Jesse J. Salk;Michael W. Schmitt;Michael W. Schmitt;Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Infidelity of DNA synthesis in vitro: screening for potential metal mutagens or carcinogens.

    Michael A. Sirover;Lawrence A. Loeb

  • Overexpression of Catalase Targeted to Mitochondria Attenuates Murine Cardiac Aging

    Dao Fu Dai;Luis Fernando Santana;Marc Vermulst;Daniela M. Tomazela

  • Human Cancers Express Mutator Phenotypes: Origin, Consequences and Targeting

    Lawrence A. Loeb

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Kunkel
Thomas A. Kunkel National Institutes of Health
Michael Fry
Michael Fry Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
George M. Martin
George M. Martin University of Washington
Raymond J. Monnat
Raymond J. Monnat University of Washington
Marshall S. Horwitz
Marshall S. Horwitz University of Washington
Elihu H. Estey
Elihu H. Estey University of Washington
James I. Mullins
James I. Mullins University of Washington
Jerald P. Radich
Jerald P. Radich Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Peter S. Rabinovitch
Peter S. Rabinovitch University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of interconnected careers, especially in healthcare and research. Many professionals expand their expertise by pursuing online degrees designed for flexibility and faster completion. For those interested in healthcare, accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online provide an efficient path to enter nursing without a prior degree, making it possible to transition careers seamlessly.

As you consider your education options, note that specialization can impact salary and job opportunities. For example, becoming a psychiatric mental health practitioner not only requires advanced degrees but also offers attractive compensation. Learn more about psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary by state to compare potential earnings.

If a rapid career change is your goal, you might wonder how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner. Some programs allow students to accelerate their studies and enter the workforce sooner. Additionally, for those already holding an RN license, the fastest rn to bsn program options can be completed in as little as six months, offering a swift route to career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence A. Loeb

Trending Scientists