World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
23980
World Ranking
5507
National Ranking
2617

Marshall S. Horwitz publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall S. Horwitz sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 246 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Marshall S. Horwitz D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marshall S. Horwitz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - National Institutes of Health Director's Pioneer Award
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Best Publications

  • Isolation of a Common Receptor for Coxsackie B Viruses and Adenoviruses 2 and 5

    Jeffrey M. Bergelson;Jennifer A. Cunningham;Gustavo Droguett;Evelyn A. Kurt-Jones

  • Neutrophil Elastase, Proteinase 3, and Cathepsin G as Therapeutic Targets in Human Diseases

    Brice Korkmaz;Marshall S. Horwitz;Dieter E. Jenne;Francis Gauthier

  • Whole-organism lineage tracing by combinatorial and cumulative genome editing

    Aaron McKenna;Gregory M. Findlay;James A. Gagnon;Marshall S. Horwitz

  • Heritable GATA2 mutations associated with familial myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia

    Christopher N. Hahn;Christopher N. Hahn;Chan-Eng Chong;Chan-Eng Chong;Catherine L. Carmichael;Ella J. Wilkins;Ella J. Wilkins

  • HIF1α induced switch from bivalent to exclusively glycolytic metabolism during ESC‐to‐EpiSC/hESC transition

    Wenyu Zhou;Michael Choi;Daciana Margineantu;Lilyana Margaretha

  • HIF Induces Human Embryonic Stem Cell Markers in Cancer Cells

    Julie Mathieu;Zhan Zhang;Wenyu Zhou;Amy J. Wang

  • In vitro analyses of known and novel RUNX1/AML1 mutations in dominant familial platelet disorder with predisposition to acute myelogenous leukemia: implications for mechanisms of pathogenesis

    Joëlle Michaud;Feng Wu;Motomi Osato;Gregory M. Cottles

  • The Murine CAR Homolog Is a Receptor for Coxsackie B Viruses and Adenoviruses

    Jeffrey M. Bergelson;Anita Krithivas;Leo Celi;Gustavo Droguett

  • DAP kinase activates a p19ARF/p53-mediated apoptotic checkpoint to suppress oncogenic transformation.

    Tal Raveh;Gustavo Droguett;Marshall S. Horwitz;Ronald A. DePinho

  • Mutations in proto-oncogene GFI1 cause human neutropenia and target ELA2.

    Richard E. Person;Feng Qian Li;Zhijun Duan;Kathleen F. Benson

  • The impact of adenovirus infection on the immunocompromised host

    Tsoline Kojaoghlanian;Phyllis Flomenberg;Marshall S. Horwitz;Marshall S. Horwitz

  • Germline ETV6 mutations in familial thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancy

    Michael Y. Zhang;Jane E. Churpek;Siobán B. Keel;Tom Walsh

  • A recurrent germline PAX5 mutation confers susceptibility to pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Sohela Shah;Kasmintan A. Schrader;Esmé Waanders;Andrew E. Timms

  • Interaction of an Adenovirus E3 14.7-kilodalton Protein With a Novel Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Inducible Cellular Protein Containing Leucine Zipper Domains

    Yongan Li;Jian Kang;Marshall S. Horwitz

  • Neutrophil elastase in cyclic and severe congenital neutropenia

    Marshall S. Horwitz;Zhijun Duan;Brice Korkmaz;Hu Hui Lee

  • Loss-of-function germline GATA2 mutations in patients with MDS/AML or MonoMAC syndrome and primary lymphedema reveal a key role for GATA2 in the lymphatic vasculature

    Jan Kazenwadel;Genevieve A. Secker;Yajuan J. Liu;Jill A. Rosenfeld

  • Biliary Atresia and Reovirus Type 3 Infection

    Rachel Morecki;Joy H. Glaser;Sangho Cho;William F. Balistreri

  • Identification of a cell protein (FIP-3) as a modulator of NF-kappaB activity and as a target of an adenovirus inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis.

    Yongan Li;Jian Kang;Joshua Friedman;Leonid Tarassishin

  • Insertion of the adenoviral E3 region into a recombinant viral vector prevents antiviral humoral and cellular immune responses and permits long-term gene expression.

    Yaron Ilan;Gustavo Droguett;Namita Roy Chowdhury;Yongan Li

  • Gfi1 coordinates epigenetic repression of p21Cip/WAF1 by recruitment of histone lysine methyltransferase G9a and histone deacetylase 1.

    Zhijun Duan;Adrian Zarebski;Diego Montoya-Durango;H. Leighton Grimes

Frequent Co-Authors

Hamish S. Scott
Hamish S. Scott University of Adelaide
Jay Shendure
Jay Shendure University of Washington
David Wallach
David Wallach Weizmann Institute of Science
Lawrence A. Loeb
Lawrence A. Loeb University of Washington
H. Leighton Grimes
H. Leighton Grimes Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Wendy H. Raskind
Wendy H. Raskind University of Washington
Robert I. Richards
Robert I. Richards University of Adelaide
Jerard Hurwitz
Jerard Hurwitz Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade University of Chicago
Akiko Shimamura
Akiko Shimamura Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a variety of dynamic online degrees and rewarding career paths. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, is medical billing and coding a good career explores the potential benefits and challenges of entering this rapidly growing field.

Health data is vital to patient care and hospital management. Earning an online health information management degree prepares graduates for roles ensuring the accuracy, accessibility, and security of medical information. This pathway is ideal for those who want to blend science with technology.

Students passionate about nutrition can pursue an online masters degree in nutrition, leading to advanced opportunities in healthcare, research, or public health education. This degree can help you specialize and expand your impact in dietetics and wellness.

If you’re interested in hands-on healthcare roles, ultrasound tech school online programs offer a flexible way to train as a diagnostic medical sonographer. These programs equip you to work directly with patients and cutting-edge medical technology.

Best Scientists Citing Marshall S. Horwitz

Trending Scientists