World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
48
Citations
20821
World Ranking
1078
National Ranking
474

John U. Farley publications per year

1961: 1 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publications 1964: 5 publications 1965: 1 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 2 publications 1968: 6 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 9 publications 1976: 1 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publications 1993: 1 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 2 publications
1961 2026

148 publications in total across all disciplines

John U. Farley publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John U. Farley sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 121 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

John U. Farley D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John U. Farley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

John U. Farley was affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States. Their research output spanned topics primarily in Computer Science and Mathematics, with notable focus on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics. The researcher also contributed to fields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Mathematical Physics.

Their work covered various advanced topics, including:

  • Advanced Algebra and Logic
  • Semigroups and automata theory
  • Advanced Topology and Set Theory
  • Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research

Farley published extensively, with a selection of significant papers including:

  • "An Issue Raised in 1978 by a Then-Future Editor-in-Chief of the Journal 'Order': Does the Endomorphism Poset of a Finite Connected Poset Tell Us That the Poset Is Connected?" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Was Gelfand Right? The Many Loves of Lattice Theory" (2022), published in Notices of the American Mathematical Society
  • "Poset Exponentiation and a Counterexample Birkhoff Said in 1942 He Did Not Have" (2021), published in Order
  • "A 'Challenging Question' of Björner from 1976: Every Infinite Geometric Lattice of Finite Rank Has a Matching" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Another problem of Jónsson and McKenzie from 1982: refinement properties for connected powers of posets" (2021), published in Algebra Universalis

The researcher frequently published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Mathematica Pannonica
  • Mathematica Bohemica
  • Notices of the American Mathematical Society
  • Order

Collaborations were an integral aspect of Farley's work. Their frequent coauthors included Dominic van der Zypen and Murali K. Srinivasan, each having coauthored multiple papers alongside Farley.

Best Publications

  • Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms : a quadrad analysis

    Rohit Deshpandé;John U. Farley;Frederick E. Webster

  • Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis

    Noel Capon;John U. Farley;Jerry Wind

  • Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis

    Rohit Deshpandé;Rohit Deshpandé;John U. Farley;John U. Farley

  • ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, MARKET ORIENTATION, INNOVATIVENESS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ODYSSEY

    Rohit Deshpandé;John U Farley;John U Farley

  • A Meta-Analysis of Applications of Diffusion Models:

    Fareena Sultan;John U. Farley;Donald R. Lehmann

  • How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results:

    Gert Assmus;John U. Farley;Donald R. Lehmann

  • Profiles of Product Innovators Among Large U.S. Manufacturers

    Noel Capon;John U. Farley;Donald R. Lehmann;James M. Hulbert

  • Corporate Culture and Market Orientation: Comparing Indian and Japanese Firms

    R. Deshpande;J. U. Farley

  • Beyond Market Orientation: When Customers and Suppliers Disagree

    Christine Steinman;Rohit Deshpandé;John U. Farley;John U. Farley

  • Executive Insights: Corporate Culture and Market Orientation: Comparing Indian and Japanese Firms:

    Rohit Deshpandé;John U. Farley

  • The Structure of Survey-Based Brand Metrics

    Donald R. Lehmann;Kevin Lane Keller;John U. Farley

  • Understanding Market Orientation: A Prospectively Designed Meta-Analysis of Three Market Orientation Scales

    Rohit Deshpandé;John U. Farley

  • Looking at Your World Through Your Customer's Eyes: Cross-National Differences in Buyer-Seller Alliances

    Rohit Deshpandé;John U. Farley

  • Some comparisons of tests for a shift in the slopes of a multivariate linear time series model

    John U. Farley;Melvin Hinich;Timothy W. McGuire

  • A Test for a Shifting Slope Coefficient in a Linear Model

    John U. Farley;Melvin J. Hinich

  • Triad lessons: Generalizing results on high performance firms in five business-to-business markets

    Rohit Deshpandé;John U Farley;John U Farley;Frederick E Webster

  • Why Does "Brand Loyalty" Vary Over Products?

    John U. Farley

  • The state of interactive marketing in seven countries: Interactive marketing comes of age

    Patrick Barwise;John U. Farley

  • Cross-national “laws” and differences in market response

    John U. Farley;Donald R. Lehmann

  • An Optimal Plan for Salesmen's Compensation:

    John U. Farley

  • Empirical Marketing Generalization Using Meta-Analysis

    John U. Farley;Donald R. Lehmann;Alan Sawyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Rohit Deshpandé
Rohit Deshpandé Harvard University
Donald R. Lehmann
Donald R. Lehmann Columbia University
Praveen K. Kopalle
Praveen K. Kopalle Dartmouth College
Kevin Lane Keller
Kevin Lane Keller Dartmouth College
Charles B. Weinberg
Charles B. Weinberg University of British Columbia
Russell S. Winer
Russell S. Winer New York University
Roland T. Rust
Roland T. Rust University of Maryland, College Park
Robert E. Lucas
Robert E. Lucas University of Chicago
Andrew F. Hayes
Andrew F. Hayes University of Calgary
Christina Lee
Christina Lee University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Business and Management in the USA is closely connected with a wide range of online degree options that can broaden career prospects and skillsets. For those aiming to lead at the highest organizational levels, pursuing organizational leadership doctoral programs offers advanced expertise in strategic decision-making and leadership theory.

Many students are also seeking flexible and reputable distance learning options. Exploring the best online colleges ensures that your degree is recognized, accredited, and tailored to your professional ambitions.

Specialized industries present unique management opportunities as well. Consider an online construction management accelerated program if you are interested in overseeing construction projects or infrastructure initiatives. Alternatively, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online can open doors to administrative leadership within hospitals, clinics, and healthcare systems.

Choosing the right program from reputable providers is key. Whether you aspire to executive roles or industry-specific management positions, these online pathways support your professional growth and adaptability in the dynamic business environment.

Best Scientists Citing John U. Farley

Recently Published Articles