World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
29218
World Ranking
14991
National Ranking
1378

Johannes Attems publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Attems sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 347 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Johannes Attems D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Attems sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes Attems is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a strong focus on Neurology, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Molecular Biology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. The main topics of their work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, dementia and cognitive impairment research, neurological diseases and metabolism, neurological disorders and treatments, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, and nuclear receptors and signaling.

Attems has contributed to numerous scientific publications and is frequently published in venues such as:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Acta Neuropathologica
  • Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • Brain

Among their recent papers are:

  • Neuropathological consensus criteria for the evaluation of Lewy pathology in post-mortem brains: a multi-centre study (2021, published in Acta Neuropathologica)

Other notable recent publications where Attems is a co-author include research addressing Alzheimer's disease, α-synuclein phosphorylation, and neuropathologic staging, although these do not list Attems as the primary author.

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Alan Thomas
  • Daniel Erskine
  • Lauren Walker
  • Kirsty E. McAleese
  • Dennis W. Dickson

The scientist's research integrates neuropathology and molecular biology techniques aimed at understanding neurodegenerative diseases, especially Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Their work has contributed to the establishment of consensus criteria and staging methods for neuropathologic evaluation, as demonstrated in their publication record.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies Fourth consensus report of the DLB Consortium

    Ian G. McKeith;Bradley F. Boeve;Dennis W. DIckson;Glenda Halliday

  • Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging

    John F. Crary;John Q. Trojanowski;Julie A. Schneider;Jose F. Abisambra

  • Limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy (LATE): consensus working group report.

    Peter T. Nelson;Dennis W. Dickson;John Q. Trojanowski;Clifford R. Jack

  • The overlap between vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease - lessons from pathology

    Johannes Attems;Kurt A Jellinger

  • Aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG): harmonized evaluation strategy

    Gabor G. Kovacs;Isidro Ferrer;Lea T. Grinberg;Lea T. Grinberg;Irina Alafuzoff

  • Genome sequencing analysis identifies new loci associated with Lewy body dementia and provides insights into its genetic architecture

    Ruth Chia;Marya S. Sabir;Sara Bandres-Ciga

  • Interactions of pathological proteins in neurodegenerative diseases.

    Tara L. Spires-Jones;Johannes Attems;Dietmar Rudolf Thal

  • Frontotemporal dementia and its subtypes: a genome-wide association study

    Raffaele Ferrari;Raffaele Ferrari;Dena G Hernandez;Dena G Hernandez;Michael A Nalls;Jonathan D Rohrer

  • Review: sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

    J Attems;K Jellinger;Dietmar Thal;W Van Nostrand

  • Dementia with Lewy bodies: an update and outlook

    Tiago Fleming Outeiro;Tiago Fleming Outeiro;Tiago Fleming Outeiro;David J. Koss;Daniel Erskine;Lauren Walker

  • Progress toward standardized diagnosis of vascular cognitive impairment: Guidelines from the Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study

    Olivia Skrobot;Sandra Black;Christopher Chen;Charles Decarli

  • Neuropathological evaluation of mixed dementia

    K.A. Jellinger;J. Attems

  • Prevalence of dementia disorders in the oldest-old: an autopsy study

    Kurt A. Jellinger;Johannes Attems

  • Olfaction and Aging: A Mini-Review.

    Johannes Attems;Lauren Walker;Kurt A Jellinger

  • Olfactory bulb involvement in neurodegenerative diseases

    Johannes Attems;Lauren Walker;Kurt A. Jellinger

  • Vascular cognitive impairment neuropathology guidelines (VCING): the contribution of cerebrovascular pathology to cognitive impairment

    Olivia A. Skrobot;Johannes Attems;Margaret Esiri;Tibor Hortobágyi;Tibor Hortobágyi

  • Phosphorylation of different tau sites during progression of Alzheimer's disease.

    Joerg Neddens;Magdalena Temmel;Stefanie Flunkert;Bianca Kerschbaumer

  • Parietal white matter lesions in Alzheimer’s disease are associated with cortical neurodegenerative pathology, but not with small vessel disease

    Kirsty E. McAleese;Lauren Walker;Sophie Graham;Elisa L. J. Moya

  • Prevalence and impact of vascular and Alzheimer pathologies in Lewy body disease

    Kurt A. Jellinger;Johannes Attems

  • Vascular dementia: different forms of vessel disorders contribute to the development of dementia in the elderly brain.

    Dietmar Rudolf Thal;Lea Tenenholz Grinberg;Lea Tenenholz Grinberg;Johannes Attems

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt A. Jellinger
Kurt A. Jellinger Medical University of Vienna
Alan J. Thomas
Alan J. Thomas Newcastle University
Paul T. Francis
Paul T. Francis University of Exeter
Christopher Morris
Christopher Morris Newcastle University
Gabor G. Kovacs
Gabor G. Kovacs University of Toronto
Dag Aarsland
Dag Aarsland King's College London
Ian G. McKeith
Ian G. McKeith Newcastle University
Tibor Hortobágyi
Tibor Hortobágyi University of Debrecen
John T. O'Brien
John T. O'Brien University of Cambridge
Clive Ballard
Clive Ballard University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to many rewarding career paths beyond the traditional MD. With the rise of flexible learning, prospective healthcare professionals can now pursue a diverse range of online programs, making advanced medical education more accessible and affordable.

For those interested in nursing leadership, exploring the least expensive dnp programs can be a smart way to advance career prospects without incurring significant debt. Pharmacists looking to upskill or transition into clinical roles may benefit from researching accredited pharm d online programs.

Technology-focused students can contribute to better healthcare delivery by enrolling in health information technology programs online, gaining expertise in managing electronic health records and patient data.

Finally, those who prefer administrative or remote healthcare roles may want to investigate how much is medical billing and coding school to get started in a fast-growing, in-demand field.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes Attems

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles