World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Florence Tupin

Florence Tupin

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
9111
World Ranking
8269
National Ranking
190

Florence Tupin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Tupin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 243 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Florence Tupin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Florence Tupin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Florence Tupin is affiliated with Télécom ParisTech in France. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Computer Science, with significant focus on Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition among their subfields.

The scientist's work covers several topics including:

  • Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
  • Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
  • Advanced Image Processing Techniques

Recent publications by Florence Tupin include:

  • SAR2SAR: A Semi-Supervised Despeckling Algorithm for SAR Images, 2021, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
  • From Interferometric to Tomographic SAR: A Review of Synthetic Aperture Radar Tomography-Processing Techniques for Scatterer Unmixing in Urban Areas, 2020, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
  • As If by Magic: Self-Supervised Training of Deep Despeckling Networks With MERLIN, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Multitemporal Speckle Reduction With Self-Supervised Deep Neural Networks, 2023, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Narrow River Extraction From SAR Images Using Exogenous Information, 2021, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Florence Tupin include:

  • Laurent Denis
  • Emanuele Dalsasso
  • Inès Meraoumia
  • Nicolas Gasnier
  • Gilda Schirinzi

Florence Tupin has a presence in multiple reputable publication venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
  • IGARSS 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Best Publications

  • Iterative Weighted Maximum Likelihood Denoising With Probabilistic Patch-Based Weights

    C.-A. Deledalle;L. Denis;F. Tupin

  • Detection of linear features in SAR images: application to road network extraction

    F. Tupin;H. Maitre;J.-F. Mangin;J.-M. Nicolas

  • SAR-SIFT: A SIFT-LIKE ALGORITHM FOR SAR IMAGES

    Flora Dellinger;Julie Delon;Yann Gousseau;Julien Michel

  • A new statistical model for Markovian classification of urban areas in high-resolution SAR images

    C. Tison;J.-M. Nicolas;F. Tupin;H. Maitre

  • NL-SAR: A Unified Nonlocal Framework for Resolution-Preserving (Pol)(In)SAR Denoising

    Charles-Alban Deledalle;Loïc Denis;Florence Tupin;Andreas Reigber

  • Time series analysis of Mexico City subsidence constrained by radar interferometry

    Penélope López-Quiroz;Penélope López-Quiroz;Marie-Pierre Doin;Florence Tupin;Pierre Briole

  • NL-InSAR: Nonlocal Interferogram Estimation

    Charles-Alban Deledalle;Loïc Denis;Florence Tupin

  • Unsupervised classification of radar images using hidden Markov chains and hidden Markov random fields

    R. Fjortoft;Y. Delignon;W. Pieczynski;M. Sigelle

  • Exploiting Patch Similarity for SAR Image Processing: The nonlocal paradigm

    Charles-Alban Deledalle;Loic Denis;Giovanni Poggi;Florence Tupin

  • How to Compare Noisy Patches? Patch Similarity Beyond Gaussian Noise

    Charles-Alban Deledalle;Loïc Denis;Florence Tupin

  • MuLoG, or How to Apply Gaussian Denoisers to Multi-Channel SAR Speckle Reduction?

    Charles-Alban Deledalle;Loic Denis;Sonia Tabti;Florence Tupin

  • Detection of building outlines based on the fusion of SAR and optical features

    F Tupin;M Roux

  • Road detection in dense urban areas using SAR imagery and the usefulness of multiple views

    F. Tupin;B. Houshmand;M. Datcu

  • Junction-aware extraction and regularization of urban road networks in high-resolution SAR images

    M. Negri;P. Gamba;G. Lisini;F. Tupin

  • Poisson NL means: Unsupervised non local means for Poisson noise

    Charles-Alban Deledalle;Florence Tupin;Loic Denis

  • Mexico City Subsidence Measured by InSAR Time Series: Joint Analysis Using PS and SBAS Approaches

    Yajing Yan;M. P. Doin;P. Lopez-Quiroz;F. Tupin

  • A first step toward automatic interpretation of SAR images using evidential fusion of several structure detectors

    F. Tupin;I. Bloch;H. Maitre

  • CARRADA Dataset: Camera and Automotive Radar with Range- Angle- Doppler Annotations

    Arthur Ouaknine;Alasdair Newson;Julien Rebut;Florence Tupin

  • SAR2SAR: A Semi-Supervised Despeckling Algorithm for SAR Images

    Emanuele Dalsasso;Loic Denis;Florence Tupin

  • SAR Image Regularization With Fast Approximate Discrete Minimization

    L. Denis;F. Tupin;J. Darbon;M. Sigelle

  • Extraction and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Isolated Buildings in Urban Scenes From High-Resolution Optical and SAR Spaceborne Images

    H. Sportouche;F. Tupin;L. Denise

  • Feature fusion to improve road network extraction in high-resolution SAR images

    G. Lisini;C. Tison;F. Tupin;P. Gamba

Frequent Co-Authors

Loïc Denis
Loïc Denis Jean Monnet University
Yann Gousseau
Yann Gousseau Télécom ParisTech
Marie-Pierre Doin
Marie-Pierre Doin Grenoble Alpes University
Pierre Briole
Pierre Briole École Normale Supérieure
Roberto M. Cesar
Roberto M. Cesar Universidade de São Paulo
Paolo Gamba
Paolo Gamba University of Pavia
Isabelle Bloch
Isabelle Bloch Télécom ParisTech
Jean-François Mangin
Jean-François Mangin University of Paris-Saclay

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, exploring online degree options is a smart way to expand your opportunities. Many students are keen on finding flexible and cost-effective learning pathways that align with their career goals.

There’s a growing interest in pursuing affordable phd programs online, especially for those wanting to specialize or move into research and academic roles. Alternatively, those looking to earn a terminal degree in education or administration quickly might consider the cheapest online edd programs, which can significantly shorten the time needed to advance your qualifications.

For students who want to enter the workforce quickly, a 6 month degree course can provide foundational skills in technology or related fields, offering a fast track into entry-level jobs. Additionally, combining your computer science background with business know-how is easy with a business management degree online cost overview, making dual skillsets more accessible and affordable.

Exploring these online options can help you tailor your education to fit your timeframe, budget, and long-term career plans.

Best Scientists Citing Florence Tupin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles