World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charlotte Poschenrieder

Charlotte Poschenrieder

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
75
Citations
18770
World Ranking
544
National Ranking
14

Charlotte Poschenrieder publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Poschenrieder sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 213 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Charlotte Poschenrieder D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charlotte Poschenrieder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Plant water relations as affected by heavy metal stress: A review

    J. Barceló;Ch. Poschenrieder

  • Fast root growth responses, root exudates, and internal detoxification as clues to the mechanisms of aluminium toxicity and resistance: a review

    Juan Barceló;Charlotte Poschenrieder

  • The role of root exudates in aluminium resistance and silicon‐induced amelioration of aluminium toxicity in three varieties of maize (Zea mays L.)

    P.S. Kidd;M. Llugany;C. Poschenrieder;B. Gunsé

  • Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants

    Roghieh Hajiboland;Naser Aliasgharzadeh;Shirin Farsad Laiegh;Charlotte Poschenrieder

  • A glance into aluminum toxicity and resistance in plants.

    Charlotte Poschenrieder;Benet Gunsé;Isabel Corrales;Juan Barceló

  • Trace element behaviour at the root-soil interface: Implications in phytoremediation

    Petra Kidd;Juan Barceló;M. Pilar Bernal;Flavia Navari-Izzo

  • Phytoremediation : principles and perspectives

    Charlotte Poschenrieder;Joan Barceló i Coll

  • Influence of Cadmium on Water Relations, Stomatal Resistance, and Abscisic Acid Content in Expanding Bean Leaves

    Charlotte Poschenrieder;Benet Gunsé;Juan Barceló

  • Can metals defend plants against biotic stress

    Charlotte Poschenrieder;Roser Tolrà;Juan Barceló

  • A Role for Zinc in Plant Defense Against Pathogens and Herbivores.

    Catalina Cabot;Soledad Martos;Mercè Llugany;Berta Gallego

  • Do toxic ions induce hormesis in plants

    Charlotte Poschenrieder;Catalina Cabot;Soledad Martos;Berta Gallego

  • Root cell patterning: a primary target for aluminium toxicity in maize

    Snezhanka Doncheva;Montserrat Amenós;Charlotte Poschenrieder;Juan Barceló

  • Localization of zinc and cadmium in Thlaspi caerulescens (Brassicaceae), a metallophyte that can hyperaccumulate both metals

    M.D. Vázquez;J. Barceló;Ch. Poschenrieder;J. Mádico

  • Arsenic and heavy metal contamination of soil and vegetation around a copper mine in Northern Peru

    Jaume Bech;Charlotte Poschenrieder;Mercè Llugany;Juan Barceló

  • Chromium vi induced structural and ultrastructural changes in bush bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

    M. D. Vázquez;C. H. Poschenrieder;J. Barceló

  • Structural and ultrastructural disorders in cadmium‐treated bush bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

    J. Barceló;M. D. Vázquez;Ch. Poschenrieder

  • Change in Apoplastic Aluminum during the Initial Growth Response to Aluminum by Roots of a Tolerant Maize Variety

    María Dolores Vázquez;Charlotte Poschenrieder;Isabel Corrales;Juan Barceló

  • Compartmentation of Zinc in Roots and Leaves of the Zinc Hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens J & C Presl

    M. D. Vázquez;Ch. Poschenrieder;J. Barceló;A. J. M. Baker

  • Water Relations in Heavy Metal Stressed Plants

    Ch. Poschenrieder;J. Barceló

  • Cell-Type-Specific H+-ATPase Activity in Root Tissues Enables K+ Retention and Mediates Acclimation of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) to Salinity Stress

    Lana Shabala;Jingyi Zhang;Igor Pottosin;Jayakumar Bose

  • Monitoring of aluminium‐induced inhibition of root elongation in four maize cultivars differing in tolerance to aluminium and proton toxicity

    Mercé Llugany;Charlotte Poschenrieder;Juan Barceló

  • Silicon amelioration of manganese toxicity in Mn-sensitive and Mn-tolerant maize varieties

    S.-N. Doncheva;C. Poschenrieder;Z.-L. Stoyanova;K. Georgieva

  • Lessons from crop plants struggling with salinity.

    Catalina Cabot;John V. Sibole;Juan Barceló;Charlotte Poschenrieder

  • Membrane transporters mediating root signalling and adaptive responses to oxygen deprivation and soil flooding.

    Sergey Shabala;Lana Shabala;Juan Barcelo;Charlotte Poschenrieder

  • Effective Use of Water and Increased Dry Matter Partitioned to Grain Contribute to Yield of Common Bean Improved for Drought Resistance

    Jose Arnulfo Polania;Charlotte Poschenrieder;Stephen E. Beebe;Idupulapati M. Rao

Frequent Co-Authors

Juan Barceló
Juan Barceló Autonomous University of Barcelona
Roghieh Hajiboland
Roghieh Hajiboland University of Tabriz
Marjana Regvar
Marjana Regvar University of Ljubljana
Sergey Shabala
Sergey Shabala University of Western Australia
Enrico Dinelli
Enrico Dinelli University of Bologna
Chedly Abdelly
Chedly Abdelly Center of Biotechnogy of Borj Cédria
Idupulapati M. Rao
Idupulapati M. Rao Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Lana Shabala
Lana Shabala University of Tasmania
David E. Salt
David E. Salt University of Nottingham
Stephen E. Beebe
Stephen E. Beebe Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Charlotte Poschenrieder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles