World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8749 8170 4655 4237 140 8711

Jo Anne Sirey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jo Anne Sirey between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jo Anne Sirey published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 15 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 1999: 6 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 6 publications
1999 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jo Anne Sirey: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 6
2000 1
2001 6
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 6
2009 3
2010 1
2011 5
2012 6
2013 7
2014 8
2015 5
2016 7
2017 8
2018 11
2019 8
2020 12
2021 9
2022 5
2023 10
2024 9
2025 6
Total 149
Download as CSV

Jo Anne Sirey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jo Anne Sirey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 140 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 140
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jo Anne Sirey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jo Anne Sirey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jo Anne Sirey is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has a research focus spanning psychology and social sciences. Their work concentrates extensively on health-related topics, particularly those intersecting with clinical and social psychology, demography, and general health professions.

The primary themes in their research include health disparities and outcomes, elder abuse and neglect, mental health treatment and access, digital mental health interventions, and dementia and cognitive impairment research. These topics illustrate a consistent engagement with public health issues and mental health challenges faced by aging populations.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jo Anne Sirey include Nili Solomonov, Samprit Banerjee, George S. Alexopoulos, Patrick J. Raue, and Isabel Rollandi. These collaborations highlight a network of researchers working within similar thematic fields of geriatric psychiatry and mental health.

Jo Anne Sirey has published several papers in well-known academic journals, with notable recent works including:

  • "Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Elder Mistreatment and Response in New York City: Initial Lessons," 2020, Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • "Perceived Social Support and Interpersonal Functioning as Predictors of Treatment Response Among Depressed Older Adults," 2021, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • "Comparing the streamlined psychotherapy 'Engage' with problem-solving therapy in late-life major depression. A randomized clinical trial," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Modifiable predictors of nonresponse to psychotherapies for late-life depression with executive dysfunction: a machine learning approach," 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Modifiable predictors of suicidal ideation during psychotherapy for late-life major depression. A machine learning approach," 2021, Translational Psychiatry

The most frequent publication venues for their work include the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Innovation in Aging, Molecular Psychiatry, International Psychogeriatrics, and JAMA Psychiatry. The majority of their published research appears in journals focused on geriatric mental health and psychiatry.

Jo Anne Sirey's scholarly output reflects ongoing research in areas such as elder mistreatment, mental health interventions tailored for older adults, and applications of machine learning in psychotherapy outcomes. Their work also involves examining social support systems and treatment responses within aging populations.

Best Publications

  • Perceived Stigma as a Predictor of Treatment Discontinuation in Young and Older Outpatients With Depression

    Jo Anne Sirey;Martha L. Bruce;George S. Alexopoulos;Deborah A. Perlick

  • Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence.

    Jo Anne Sirey;Martha L. Bruce;George S. Alexopoulos;Deborah A. Perlick

  • Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Adverse effects of perceived stigma on social adaptation of persons diagnosed with bipolar affective disorder.

    Deborah A. Perlick;Robert A. Rosenheck;John F. Clarkin;Jo Anne Sirey

  • Executive dysfunction and long-term outcomes of geriatric depression.

    George S. Alexopoulos;Barnett S. Meyers;Robert C. Young;Balu Kalayam

  • Stigma as a Barrier to Recovery: The Extent to Which Caregivers Believe Most People Devalue Consumers and Their Families

    Elmer L. Struening;Deborah A. Perlick;Bruce G. Link;Fredric Hellman

  • Depressive mood and obesity in US adults : comparison and moderation by sex, age, and race

    M Heo;A Pietrobelli;K R Fontaine;J A Sirey

  • Clinical determinants of suicidal ideation and behavior in geriatric depression.

    George S. Alexopoulos;Martha L. Bruce;James Hull;Jo Anne Sirey

  • Burden experienced by care-givers of persons with bipolar affective disorder.

    Deborah Perlick;John F. Clarkin;Jo Anne Sirey;Patrick Raue

  • Impact of Family Burden and Affective Response on Clinical Outcome Among Patients With Bipolar Disorder

    Deborah A. Perlick;Robert A. Rosenheck;John F. Clarkin;Paul K. Maciejewski

  • Perceived Stigma and Patient-Rated Severity of Illness as Predictors of Antidepressant Drug Adherence

    Jo Anne Sirey;Martha L. Bruce;S. Alexopoulos;Deborah A. Perlick

  • Impact of family burden and patient symptom status on clinical outcome in bipolar affective disorder.

    Deborah A. Perlick;Robert R. Rosenheck;John F. Clarkin;Patrick Raue

  • Depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among older adults receiving home delivered meals.

    Jo Anne Sirey;Martha L. Bruce;Mae Carpenter;Diane Booker

  • Predictors of Antidepressant Prescription and Early Use Among Depressed Outpatients

    Jo Anne Sirey;Barnett S. Meyers;Martha L. Bruce;George S. Alexopoulos

  • The Treatment Initiation Program: an intervention to improve depression outcomes in older adults.

    Jo Anne Sirey;Martha L. Bruce;George S. Alexopoulos

  • Ecosystem focused therapy in poststroke depression: a preliminary study

    George S. Alexopoulos;Victoria M. Wilkins;Patricia Marino;Dora Kanellopoulos

  • The Cornell Service Index as a Measure of Health Service Use

    Jo Anne Sirey;Barnett S. Meyers;Jeanne A. Teresi;Martha L. Bruce

  • Predictors of early recovery from major depression among persons admitted to community-based clinics: an observational study.

    Barnett S. Meyers;Jo Anne Sirey;Martha Bruce;Mimi Hamilton

  • Impact of social support and self-efficacy on functioning in depressed older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Patricia Marino;Jo Anne Sirey;Patrick J Raue;George S Alexopoulos

  • Medication Beliefs and Self-Reported Adherence Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults

    Jo Anne Sirey;Alexandra Greenfield;Mark I. Weinberger;Martha L. Bruce

  • Outcomes of depressed patients undergoing inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.

    George S. Alexopoulos;Jo Anne Sirey;Patrick J. Raue;Dora Kanellopoulos

  • Engagement in Socially and Interpersonally Rewarding Activities as a Predictor of Outcome in “Engage” Behavioral Activation Therapy for Late-Life Depression

    Nili Solomonov;Jennifer N. Bress;Jo Anne Sirey;Faith M. Gunning

Frequent Co-Authors

George S. Alexopoulos
George S. Alexopoulos Cornell University
Martha L. Bruce
Martha L. Bruce Dartmouth College
Patricia A. Areán
Patricia A. Areán University of Washington
John F. Clarkin
John F. Clarkin Cornell University
Robert A. Rosenheck
Robert A. Rosenheck Yale University
Bruce G. Link
Bruce G. Link University of California, Riverside
Moonseong Heo
Moonseong Heo Clemson University
Karl Pillemer
Karl Pillemer Cornell University
Daniel B. Herman
Daniel B. Herman Hunter College
Yvette I. Sheline
Yvette I. Sheline University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens many pathways, especially with the surge in online degrees. Prospective students now can choose from a variety of affordable options, making it easier to start a career in counseling or related fields without relocating or incurring high tuition costs. For instance, Florida offers some of the cheapest online counseling programs in Florida, providing flexibility for both in-state and distance learners.

Similarly, students interested in affordability and flexibility might consider the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Georgia, which highlights programs combining academic rigor with cost-effectiveness. In urban centers, there are also options like the cheapest online counseling programs in Los Angeles, ideal for those seeking opportunities in a diverse, metropolitan setting.

For advanced studies, those aiming for leadership roles or specialized practice may look into the cheapest online counseling master's programs in California. These diverse, accredited programs can lead to various career paths, such as licensure as a counselor, therapist, or roles in human services. Online degrees make it more accessible than ever to pursue these rewarding careers from virtually anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Jo Anne Sirey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles