World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eckart Priesack

Eckart Priesack

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
12354
World Ranking
5963
National Ranking
394

Eckart Priesack publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckart Priesack sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 159 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Eckart Priesack D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckart Priesack sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eckart Priesack is affiliated with the University of Bonn in Germany and conducts research primarily within the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their research addresses key topics such as climate change impacts on agriculture, crop yield and soil fertility, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, wheat and barley genetics and pathology, greenhouse technology and climate control, plant responses to elevated CO₂, and agricultural economics and policy.

Recent publications by Eckart Priesack include:

  • Modelling climate change impacts on maize yields under low nitrogen input conditions in sub-Saharan Africa (2020, Global Change Biology)
  • Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: Scaling Up and Scaling Down in Crops (2020, Frontiers in Plant Science)
  • Multifunctionality of temperate alley-cropping agroforestry outperforms open cropland and grassland (2023, Communications Earth & Environment)
  • Evidence for increasing global wheat yield potential (2022, Environmental Research Letters)
  • Crop growth and soil water fluxes at erosion-affected arable sites: Using weighing lysimeter data for model intercomparison (2020, Vadose Zone Journal)

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Bruno Basso
  • Gerrit Hoogenboom
  • Heidi Webber
  • Tobias K. D. Weber
  • Thomas Gaiser

Frequent publication venues are:

  • Open Data Journal for Agricultural Research
  • Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Vadose Zone Journal
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))

Best Publications

  • Rising Temperatures Reduce Global Wheat Production

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;P. Martre;P. Martre;R. P. Rötter

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • How Do Various Maize Crop Models Vary in Their Responses to Climate Change Factors

    Simona Bassu;Nadine Brisson;Jean Louis Durand;Kenneth Boote

  • Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods

    Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng;Christoph Müller;Frank Ewert

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • A Network of Terrestrial Environmental Observatories in Germany

    Steffen Zacharias;Heye Bogena;Luis Samaniego;Matthias Mauder

  • Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein

    Senthold Asseng;Pierre Martre;Andrea Maiorano;Reimund P Rötter

  • The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions.

    Enli Wang;Pierre Martre;Zhigan Zhao;Zhigan Zhao;Frank Ewert

  • Comparison of N2O emissions from soils at three temperate agricultural sites: simulations of year-round measurements by four models

    Steve Frolking;A R Mosier;Dennis S Ojima;Changsheng Li

  • Impact of spatial soil and climate input data aggregation on regional yield simulations

    Holger Hoffmann;Gang Zhao;Senthold Asseng;Marco Bindi

  • Closed-Form Expression for the Multi-Modal Unsaturated Conductivity Function

    E. Priesack;W. Durner

  • Global wheat production with 1.5 and 2.0°C above pre-industrial warming

    Bing Liu;Pierre Martre;Frank Ewert;John R. Porter;John R. Porter;John R. Porter

  • Multimodel ensembles improve predictions of crop-environment-management interactions.

    Daniel Wallach;Pierre Martre;Bing Liu;Bing Liu;Senthold Asseng

  • Crop Model Improvement Reduces the Uncertainty of the Response to Temperature of Multi-Model Ensembles

    Andrea Maiorano;Pierre Martre;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • Modelling climate change impacts on maize yields under low nitrogen input conditions in sub-Saharan Africa.

    Gatien N. Falconnier;Marc Corbeels;Kenneth J. Boote;François Affholder

  • The plant's capacity in regulating resource demand.

    R. Matyssek;R. Agerer;D. Ernst;J.-C. Munch

  • Photosynthesis in a Changing Global Climate: Scaling Up and Scaling Down in Crops.

    Marouane Baslam;Toshiaki Mitsui;Michael Hodges;Eckart Priesack

  • Importance of tree height and social position for drought-related stress on tree growth and mortality

    Rüdiger Grote;Arthur Gessler;Robert Hommel;Werner Poschenrieder

  • Modeling biomass growth, N-uptake and phenological development of potato crop

    S. Gayler;E. Wang;E. Priesack;T. Schaaf

  • Evaluating the ability of four crop models to predict different environmental impacts on spring wheat grown in open-top chambers

    Christian Biernath;Sebastian Gayler;Sebastian Bittner;Christian Klein

  • How accurately do maize crop models simulate the interactions of atmospheric CO2 concentration levels with limited water supply on water use and yield

    Jean-Louis Durand;Kenel Delusca;Ken Boote;Jon Lizaso

  • TERENO-SOILCan: a lysimeter-network in Germany observing soil processes and plant diversity influenced by climate change

    Th. Pütz;R. Kiese;U. Wollschläger;J. Groh

  • Spatial variation of nitrate-N and related soil properties at the plot-scale

    R. Stenger;E. Priesack;F. Beese

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian Gayler
Sebastian Gayler University of Hohenheim
Bruno Basso
Bruno Basso Michigan State University
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Kurt Christian Kersebaum
Kurt Christian Kersebaum Czech Academy of Sciences
Peter J. Thorburn
Peter J. Thorburn Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Fulu Tao
Fulu Tao Chinese Academy of Sciences
Claas Nendel
Claas Nendel University of Potsdam
Alex C. Ruane
Alex C. Ruane Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University
Thilo Streck
Thilo Streck University of Hohenheim

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career prospects and deepen expertise. For example, those interested in integrating social work with environmental issues might consider affordable options like dsw programs, which emphasize community well-being and sustainable interventions.

If you prefer a more flexible approach to academics, pursuing a cheap online general studies degree allows you to customize your coursework across disciplines including environmental policy, science, and communication. This flexibility supports diverse career paths.

For those looking for a degree that balances ease of completion with practical knowledge, exploring the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insight into accessible programs that still prepare graduates for entry-level environmental roles or graduate studies.

Additionally, students focused on the earth sciences aspect can enhance their qualifications through specialized online geology programs. These programs build a strong foundation in geoscience, crucial for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Eckart Priesack

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles