World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7367 6922 38 36 268 38883

Dontscho Kerjaschki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dontscho Kerjaschki between 1971 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dontscho Kerjaschki published across 50 years, from 1971 to 2020, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2006. 9 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2006. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications
1971 2020

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dontscho Kerjaschki: publications per year, 1971 to 2020
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 3
1977 0
1978 1
1979 2
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 1
1984 4
1985 1
1986 3
1987 3
1988 0
1989 4
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 4
1995 4
1996 5
1997 4
1998 5
1999 12
2000 6
2001 9
2002 15
2003 9
2004 14
2005 8
2006 24
2007 19
2008 8
2009 8
2010 13
2011 6
2012 7
2013 9
2014 7
2015 9
2016 14
2017 1
2018 6
2019 4
2020 5
Total 272
Download as CSV

Dontscho Kerjaschki publications per year - data summary

  • Dontscho Kerjaschki, a Medicine scholar from Medical University of Vienna, has 272 publications recorded across 50 years, from 1971 to 2020.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1971 and the most recent to 2020.
  • The most productive year is 2006, with 24 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1971, 1972, 1974, 1978 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 50 years in the span carry no publications at all (1973, 1975, 1977 and 1988).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.9 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2016-2020) hold 30 publications, 11% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1971-1987: 24 publications (1.4 per year); 1988-2004: 100 publications (5.9 per year); 2005-2020: 148 publications (9.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Dontscho Kerjaschki publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dontscho Kerjaschki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 268 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 268
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Dontscho Kerjaschki publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Dontscho Kerjaschki, a Medicine scholar from Medical University of Vienna, records 268 publications - the 11th percentile of the discipline.
  • 11% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Dontscho Kerjaschki, and about 89% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Dontscho Kerjaschki ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Dontscho Kerjaschki D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dontscho Kerjaschki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Dontscho Kerjaschki D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Dontscho Kerjaschki, a Medicine scholar from Medical University of Vienna, records 103 D-Index - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Dontscho Kerjaschki, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Dontscho Kerjaschki ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Overview

Dontscho Kerjaschki is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine, particularly focusing on Nephrology and Molecular Biology. Their research spans across several aspects of renal diseases, lymphatic system pathology, and molecular mechanisms underlying kidney function and disorders.

The scientist's recent publications include the following:

  • Lymphatic Capillaries in Aging, 2020, published in Gerontology
  • LIM and SH3 protein 1 (LASP-1): A novel link between the slit membrane and actin cytoskeleton dynamics in podocytes, 2020, published in The FASEB Journal
  • In memoriam: Marilyn Gist Farquhar, 1928-2019, 2020, published in Kidney International
  • Table of Contents, 2020, published in Kidney International
  • Proteolytic processing of dynamin by cytoplasmic cathepsin L is a mechanism for proteinuric kidney disease, 2020, published in UNC Libraries

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Hermann Pavenstädt
  • Yashpal S. Kanwar
  • Robert A. Orlando
  • Sanna Lehtonen
  • Aaro Miettinen

Key publication venues where Dontscho Kerjaschki frequently appears are:

  • Kidney International
  • Gerontology
  • The FASEB Journal
  • UNC Libraries

Their main fields of study are in Medicine, with subfields including:

  • Nephrology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Genetics

The primary research topics covered by Dontscho Kerjaschki include:

  • Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment

Dontscho Kerjaschki has been recognized by scientific communities through various awards including the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 2007 for contributions in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. They are also a member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Best Publications

  • Angiosarcomas Express Mixed Endothelial Phenotypes of Blood and Lymphatic Capillaries: Podoplanin as a Specific Marker for Lymphatic Endothelium

    Silvana Breiteneder-Geleff;Afschin Soleiman;Heinrich Kowalski;Reinhard Horvat

  • Isolated lymphatic endothelial cells transduce growth, survival and migratory signals via the VEGF‐C/D receptor VEGFR‐3

    Taija Mäkinen;Tanja Veikkola;Satu Mustjoki;Terhi Karpanen

  • Macrophages regulate salt-dependent volume and blood pressure by a vascular endothelial growth factor-C–dependent buffering mechanism

    Agnes Machnik;Wolfgang Neuhofer;Jonathan Jantsch;Anke Dahlmann

  • Tumor-Associated Macrophages Express Lymphatic Endothelial Growth Factors and Are Related to Peritumoral Lymphangiogenesis

    Sebastian F. Schoppmann;Peter Birner;Johannes Stöckl;Romana Kalt

  • Lymphatic endothelial reprogramming of vascular endothelial cells by the Prox-1 homeobox transcription factor

    Tatiana V. Petrova;Taija Mäkinen;Tomi P. Mäkelä;Janna Saarela

  • Autophagy influences glomerular disease susceptibility and maintains podocyte homeostasis in aging mice

    Björn Hartleben;Markus Gödel;Catherine Meyer-Schwesinger;Shuya Liu

  • Tumor invasion in the absence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition: Podoplanin-mediated remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton

    Andreas Wicki;François Lehembre;Nikolaus Wick;Brigitte Hantusch

  • The pathogenic antigen of Heymann nephritis is a membrane glycoprotein of the renal proximal tubule brush border

    Dontscho Kerjaschki;Marilyn Gist Farquhar

  • Role of the Microvascular Endothelium in Progressive Renal Disease

    Duk-Hee Kang;John Kanellis;Christian Hugo;Luan D Truong

  • Positional cloning uncovers mutations in PLCE1 responsible for a nephrotic syndrome variant that may be reversible.

    Bernward Hinkes;Roger C. Wiggins;Rasheed Gbadegesin;Christopher N. Vlangos

  • Defective valves and abnormal mural cell recruitment underlie lymphatic vascular failure in lymphedema distichiasis

    Tatiana V Petrova;Terhi Karpanen;Camilla Norrmén;Russell Mellor

  • Isolation and Characterization of Dermal Lymphatic and Blood Endothelial Cells Reveal Stable and Functionally Specialized Cell Lineages

    Ernst Kriehuber;Silvana Breiteneder-Geleff;Marion Groeger;Afschin Soleiman

  • Identification and characterization of podocalyxin--the major sialoprotein of the renal glomerular epithelial cell

    D Kerjaschki;D J Sharkey;M G Farquhar

  • Capillary Deposition of Complement Split Product C4d in Renal Allografts is Associated with Basement Membrane Injury in Peritubular and Glomerular Capillaries: A Contribution of Humoral Immunity to Chronic Allograft Rejection

    Heinz Regele;Georg A. Böhmig;Antje Habicht;Daniela Gollowitzer

  • Podoplanin, novel 43-kd membrane protein of glomerular epithelial cells, is down-regulated in puromycin nephrosis.

    S Breiteneder-Geleff;K Matsui;A Soleiman;P Meraner

  • Human blood vessel organoids as a model of diabetic vasculopathy

    Reiner A. Wimmer;Alexandra Leopoldi;Martin Aichinger;Nikolaus Wick

  • Immunocytochemical localization of the Heymann nephritis antigen (GP330) in glomerular epithelial cells of normal Lewis rats

    D Kerjaschki;MG Farquhar

  • Role of mTOR in podocyte function and diabetic nephropathy in humans and mice

    Markus Gödel;Björn Hartleben;Nadja Herbach;Shuya Liu

  • Molecular mimicry in pauci-immune focal necrotizing glomerulonephritis

    Renate Kain;Markus Exner;Ricarda Brandes;Reinhard Ziebermayr;Reinhard Ziebermayr

  • Lymphatic Neoangiogenesis in Human Kidney Transplants Is Associated with Immunologically Active Lymphocytic Infiltrates

    Dontscho Kerjaschki;Heinrich M. Regele;Isabella Moosberger;Katalyn Nagy-Bojarski

Frequent Co-Authors

Kari Alitalo
Kari Alitalo University of Helsinki
Tobias B. Huber
Tobias B. Huber Universität Hamburg
Marilyn G. Farquhar
Marilyn G. Farquhar University of California, San Diego
Harry Holthöfer
Harry Holthöfer University of Helsinki
Gerd Walz
Gerd Walz University of Freiburg
Annunziata Gloghini
Annunziata Gloghini University of Milan
Matthias Kretzler
Matthias Kretzler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Josef M. Penninger
Josef M. Penninger University of British Columbia
David J. Kerr
David J. Kerr University of Oxford
Michael Sixt
Michael Sixt Institute of Science and Technology Austria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking alternative or complementary career journeys, numerous online degree options exist in the health sector. These programs offer flexible learning and expand opportunities beyond traditional doctor roles.

Aspiring healthcare leaders can benefit from affordable mha online programs, which prepare graduates for management and administration roles within hospitals and care systems. For nurses aiming to reach the highest levels in their field, the cheapest online dnp programs offer a cost-effective pathway to clinical practice leadership and advanced research.

The healthcare industry also requires qualified pharmacists. There are now options for pharmacy school online, allowing students to pursue this in-demand career without relocating. Additionally, with the surge in digital medical records, online schools for health information management train professionals to manage patient data securely and efficiently.

Exploring these online degrees can open diverse career pathways within medicine and healthcare, fitting a variety of interests, schedules, and long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing Dontscho Kerjaschki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles