World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David R. Farley

David R. Farley

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 70 20115 18857 10010 9217 342 15528

David R. Farley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David R. Farley between 1963 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David R. Farley published across 62 years, from 1963 to 2024, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2020. 3 of the 390 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2020. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1963 2024

390 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David R. Farley: publications per year, 1963 to 2024
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 4
1993 1
1994 2
1995 3
1996 4
1997 6
1998 4
1999 8
2000 17
2001 18
2002 11
2003 10
2004 13
2005 6
2006 8
2007 5
2008 14
2009 13
2010 17
2011 18
2012 20
2013 17
2014 14
2015 15
2016 22
2017 29
2018 9
2019 24
2020 32
2021 11
2022 6
2023 2
2024 1
Total 390
Download as CSV

David R. Farley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Farley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 342 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 342
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David R. Farley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Farley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226 70
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David R. Farley is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and works primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Surgery. Their research encompasses several subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Gender Studies.

The scientist's research has spanned a variety of topics. Primary areas of focus include:

  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Hernia repair and management

David R. Farley has published extensively, with significant contributions reflected in frequent appearances in multiple peer-reviewed journals. The primary venues for their work are:

  • Journal of surgical education (5 publications)
  • The American Journal of Surgery (3 publications)
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology (2 publications)
  • Surgery (2 publications)
  • Journal of Surgical Research (2 publications)

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by David R. Farley include:

  • Workload Differentiates Breast Surgical Procedures: NSM Associated with Higher Workload Demand than SSM, 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Is same-day discharge associated with increased 30-day postoperative complications and readmissions in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy?, 2020, Surgery
  • Not all adrenal incidentalomas require biochemical testing to exclude pheochromocytoma: Mayo clinic experience and a meta-analysis, 2020, Gland Surgery
  • APDS Consensus Statement: Ideal Senior Medical Student Experiences for Preparedness for General Surgery Internship, 2020, Journal of surgical education
  • Occurrence and Natural History of Thyroid Cancer in Patients with Cowden Syndrome, 2020, European Thyroid Journal

Frequent collaborators include Jad M. Abdelsattar, Moustafa M. El Khatib, Samuel Allen, T. K. Pandian, and Vicky J.-H. Yeh.

In addition to articles, David R. Farley has contributed to book publications. One recorded book is "Mayo Clinic General Surgery," published in 2020 by Oxford University Press.

Best Publications

  • Role for adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism

    William F. Young;Anthony W. Stanson;Geoffrey B. Thompson;Clive S. Grant

  • Value of Preoperative Ultrasonography in the Surgical Management of Initial and Reoperative Papillary Thyroid Cancer

    John M. Stulak;Clive S. Grant;Clive S. Grant;David R. Farley;Geoffrey B. Thompson

  • Laparoscopic versus open posterior adrenalectomy: A case-control study of 100 patients

    Geoffrey B Thompson;Geoffrey B Thompson;Clive S Grant;Clive S Grant;Jon A van Heerden;Jon A van Heerden;Richard T Schlinkert;Richard T Schlinkert

  • Primary aldosteronism: factors associated with normalization of blood pressure after surgery.

    Anna M. Sawka;William F. Young;Geoffrey B. Thompson;Clive S. Grant

  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy With Metastasis: Can Axillary Dissection Be Avoided in Some Patients With Breast Cancer?

    Carol Reynolds;Rosemarie Mick;John H. Donohue;Clive S. Grant

  • Primary hyperparathyroidism surgical management since the introduction of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: Mayo Clinic experience.

    Clive S. Grant;Geoffrey Thompson;David Farley;Jon van Heerden

  • Simulation-based mastery learning improves patient outcomes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.

    Benjamin Zendejas;David A. Cook;Juliane Bingener;Marianne Huebner

  • What prognostic factors are important in duodenal adenocarcinoma

    Faisal G. Bakaeen;Michel M. Murr;Michael G. Sarr;Geoffrey B. Thompson

  • “Natural History” of Unresected Cholangiocarcinoma: Patient Outcome After Noncurative Intervention

    David R. Farley;Amy L. Weaver;David M. Nagorney

  • Reexploration for symptomatic hematomas after cervical exploration

    Shelby H. Burkey;Jon A. van Heerden;Geoffrey B. Thompson;Clive S. Grant

  • Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution.

    Corey W. Iqbal;Daniel C. Cullinane;Henry J. Schiller;Mark D. Sawyer

  • The aldosteronoma resolution score: predicting complete resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy for aldosteronoma.

    Rasa Zarnegar;William F. Young;James Lee;Matthew P. Sweet

  • Are patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I prone to premature death

    Patrick G. Dean;Jon A. van Heerden;David R. Farley;Geoffrey B. Thompson

  • Spigelian Hernias: Repair and Outcome for 81 Patients

    David W. Larson;David R. Farley

  • Accuracy of Adrenal Imaging and Adrenal Venous Sampling in Predicting Surgical Cure of Primary Aldosteronism

    Vivien Lim;Qinghua Guo;Clive S. Grant;Geoffrey B. Thompson

  • Linked Deficiencies in Extracellular PPi and Osteopontin Mediate Pathologic Calcification Associated With Defective PC‐1 and ANK Expression

    Kristen Johnson;James Watson Goding;Deborah Van Etten;Adnan Sali

  • Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review.

    Corey W. Iqbal;Yun Shin Chun;David R. Farley

  • The significance of sinistral portal hypertension complicating chronic pancreatitis.

    George H Sakorafas;Michael G Sarr;David R Farley;Michael B Farnell

  • Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures: Diagnosis and management

    Javairiah Fatima;Todd H. Baron;Mark D. Topazian;Scott G. Houghton

  • Adrenocortical carcinoma: surgical progress or status quo?

    Michael L. Kendrick;Ricardo Lloyd;Lori Erickson;David R. Farley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can expand your career options beyond traditional medical school programs. Many U.S. students consider online nursing degrees and accelerated programs to fast-track their entry into the medical field.

If you hold an RN license already, finding what is the cheapest rn to bsn program online can help you advance your qualifications quickly and affordably. For those looking to pivot into advanced professional roles, online doctorate options like the online phd in nursing offer flexibility for working professionals aiming for leadership or teaching positions.

Non-nursing graduates interested in healthcare may investigate direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online, which provide a streamlined route into nursing practice without a prior BSN. For students prioritizing accessibility and quicker admission, researching what is the easiest nursing school to get into can help identify programs with more flexible entrance requirements.

These online and alternative pathways offer diverse options to begin or advance your healthcare career in the USA, accommodating a variety of backgrounds and goals.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Farley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles