World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 32 2175 97 92 3458

Brigitte Michalet-Doreau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brigitte Michalet-Doreau between 1987 and 2010, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brigitte Michalet-Doreau published across 24 years, from 1987 to 2010, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1988. 2 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2010. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 1988. 1987: 5 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 7 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication
1987 2010

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brigitte Michalet-Doreau: publications per year, 1987 to 2010
Year Publications
1987 5
1988 8
1989 1
1990 7
1991 6
1992 3
1993 3
1994 7
1995 7
1996 7
1997 8
1998 4
1999 7
2000 3
2001 6
2002 6
2003 3
2004 7
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
Total 102
Download as CSV

Brigitte Michalet-Doreau publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brigitte Michalet-Doreau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 89–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 92 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84 92
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Brigitte Michalet-Doreau D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brigitte Michalet-Doreau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143 32
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Brigitte Michalet-Doreau is affiliated with INRAE, the Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement in France. This institution focuses on research related to agriculture, food, and environmental sciences.

The available data does not list specific fields of study, subfields, or main research topics associated with Brigitte Michalet-Doreau. Similarly, there is no detailed information on publications, recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues connected to this scientist.

Although no records of awards or honors are provided, the ongoing association with INRAE indicates active involvement in research related to agricultural and environmental sciences in a national research context in France.

Without specifics on the scientist's research outputs, it is not possible to outline particular contributions, publication trends, or collaborations. The focus remains on their institutional affiliation and presumed engagement within research domains linked to INRAE's areas of activity.

Best Publications

  • Influence of genotype and stage of maturity of maize on rate of ruminal starch degradation

    C. Philippeau;B. Michalet-Doreau

  • Comparison of methods for predicting digestibility of feeds

    Jocelyne Aufrere;Brigitte Michalet-Doreau

  • Relationship between ruminal starch degradation and the physical characteristics of corn grain.

    C Philippeau;F Le Deschault de Monredon;B Michalet-Doreau

  • In vitro and in sacco methods for the estimation of dietary nitrogen degradability in the rumen: a review

    Unknown

  • Fibrolytic activities and cellulolytic bacterial community structure in the solid and liquid phases of rumen contents.

    Brigitte Michalet-Doreau;Isabelle Fernandez;Céline Peyron;Liliane Millet

  • Isolation and characteristics of the protozoal and bacterial fractions from bovine ruminal contents.

    Martin C;Williams Ag;Michalet-Doreau B

  • Microbial activity in the caecum of the rabbit around weaning: impact of a dietary fibre deficiency and of intake level

    T Gidenne;N Jehl;M Segura;B Michalet-Doreau

  • Influence of the protein distribution of maize endosperm on ruminal starch degradability

    Christelle Philippeau;Jacques Landry;Brigitte Michalet-Doreau

  • Protozoa involved in butyric rather than lactic fermentative pattern during latent acidosis in sheep

    Ludovic Brossard;Cécile Martin;Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand;Brigitte Michalet-Doreau

  • Variations in mass and enzyme activity of rumen microorganisms: Effect of barley and buffer supplements

    Cécile Martin;Brigitte Michalet-Doreau

  • Influence of grain source on ruminal characteristics and rate, site, and extent of digestion in beef steers.

    C Philippeau;C Martin;B Michalet-Doreau

  • Influence of Genotype and Ensiling of Corn Grain on In Situ Degradation of Starch in the Rumen

    Unknown

  • Dose effect of live yeasts on rumen microbial communities and fermentations during butyric latent acidosis in sheep: new type of interaction

    L. Brossard;F. Chaucheyras-Durand;B. Michalet-Doreau;C. Martin

  • A comparison of enzymatic and molecular approaches to characterize the cellulolytic microbial ecosystems of the rumen and the cecum.

    B Michalet-Doreau;I Fernandez;G Fonty

  • Predicting in situ degradability of feed proteins in the rumen by two laboratory methods (solubility and enzymatic degradation)

    Jocelyne Aufrère;Dominique Graviou;C. Demarquilly;R. Vérité

  • Relevant traits, genetic variation and breeding strategies in early silage maize

    Y. Barrière;O. Argillier;B. Michalet-Doreau;Y. Hébert

  • Validation of in sacco method: influence of sampling site, nylon bag or rumen contents, on fibrolytic activity of solid-associated microorganisms

    P. Nozière;B. Michalet-Doreau

  • Consequences of underfeeding on digestion and absorption in sheep

    M. Doreau;B. Michalet-Doreau;P. Grimaud;N. Atti

  • Effect of Corn Hybrid and Chop Length of Whole-Plant Corn Silage on Digestion and Intake by Dairy Cows

    I. Fernandez;C. Martin;M. Champion;B. Michalet-Doreau

  • Ruminal fermentative parameters and blood acido-basic balance changes during the onset and recovery of induced latent acidosis in sheep

    Ludovic Brossard;Cécile Martin;Brigitte Michalet-Doreau

  • Influence of sampling site on concentrations and carbohydrate-degrading enzyme activities of protozoa and bacteria in the rumen.

    C Martin;E Devillard;B Michalet-Doreau

  • Cereal supplementation modified the fibrolytic activity but not the structure of the cellulolytic bacterial community associated with rumen solid digesta

    Cécile Martin;Liliane Millet;Gérard Fonty;Brigitte Michalet-Doreau

  • Postprandial variations in the activity of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes of fluid- and particle-associated ruminal microbial populations

    Cécile Martin;Brigitte Michalet-Doreau;Gérard Fonty;Gérard Fonty;Alan Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Cécile Martin
Cécile Martin INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Michel Doreau
Michel Doreau INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Pierre Noziere
Pierre Noziere INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Dominique Bauchart
Dominique Bauchart INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Daniel Sauvant
Daniel Sauvant AgroParisTech
N. Atti
N. Atti University of Carthage
Harry Archimède
Harry Archimède INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jean-Louis Peyraud
Jean-Louis Peyraud INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Thierry Gidenne
Thierry Gidenne INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Yves Barrière
Yves Barrière INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Animal Science and Veterinary studies often explore complementary fields that support holistic animal care and welfare. For those who wish to integrate mental health perspectives with animal work, pursuing an online apa accredited psyd programs can provide clinical psychology expertise beneficial for behavioral studies and therapy involving animals.

Additionally, online programs in counseling, such as an online substance abuse counseling degree, can expand career options to include support for communities affected by addiction, including pet owners facing related challenges. This cross-disciplinary approach enriches one’s ability to contribute to both human and animal well-being.

Another pathway worth considering is pursuing a degree in human relationships through marriage and family therapy masters programs online. Understanding family dynamics may improve client communication and case management in veterinary practices and animal-related social services.

Finally, for those aiming to reach the highest academic level in counseling with flexible options, the online doctorate in counseling offers advanced training. This can lead to leadership roles bridging animal science and mental health care, emphasizing innovative and integrative treatments.

Best Scientists Citing Brigitte Michalet-Doreau

Recently Published Articles